A Dual Perspective Study: The Italian-Albanians’ Political Activity in the Focus of the Relations Between Vienna and Rome (1895–1897)

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY Hiperboreea Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.5325/hiperboreea.10.1.0040
Ledia Dushku, Edon Qesari
{"title":"A Dual Perspective Study: The Italian-Albanians’ Political Activity in the Focus of the Relations Between Vienna and Rome (1895–1897)","authors":"Ledia Dushku, Edon Qesari","doi":"10.5325/hiperboreea.10.1.0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n At the end of the nineteenth century, both the Kingdom of Italy and Austria-Hungary, which were members of the Tripartite Alliance, were diplomatically involved in the Albanian National Question. Albeit their geopolitical rivalries, both Great Powers were willing to assume the common sponsorship of a future independent Albanian State. Sometimes antagonistically, Vienna and Rome tried to befriend the nationalistic impulses of the Albanians, including those of the Italian-Albanian community (known as the Arbëresh) settled in Italy since the late fifteenth century. This article investigates how between 1895 and 1897, both Austria-Hungary and Italy tried to gain the support of the Italian-Albanians in function of their respective foreign policies. In the late nineteenth century, different intellectuals from these communities envisioned nationalist programs for an independent Albania. Some of them found support in the imperialistic segments of the Italian governmental establishment; others were willing to cooperate and forged stronger contacts with Vienna. Yet, regardless of their frictions, both Great Powers succeeded in preserving an equilibrium between their contesting interests for controlling the Albanian nationalist movement.","PeriodicalId":40175,"journal":{"name":"Hiperboreea","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hiperboreea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/hiperboreea.10.1.0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At the end of the nineteenth century, both the Kingdom of Italy and Austria-Hungary, which were members of the Tripartite Alliance, were diplomatically involved in the Albanian National Question. Albeit their geopolitical rivalries, both Great Powers were willing to assume the common sponsorship of a future independent Albanian State. Sometimes antagonistically, Vienna and Rome tried to befriend the nationalistic impulses of the Albanians, including those of the Italian-Albanian community (known as the Arbëresh) settled in Italy since the late fifteenth century. This article investigates how between 1895 and 1897, both Austria-Hungary and Italy tried to gain the support of the Italian-Albanians in function of their respective foreign policies. In the late nineteenth century, different intellectuals from these communities envisioned nationalist programs for an independent Albania. Some of them found support in the imperialistic segments of the Italian governmental establishment; others were willing to cooperate and forged stronger contacts with Vienna. Yet, regardless of their frictions, both Great Powers succeeded in preserving an equilibrium between their contesting interests for controlling the Albanian nationalist movement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双重视角研究:以维也纳与罗马关系为焦点的意大利-阿尔巴尼亚人的政治活动(1895-1897)
在十九世纪末,作为三国联盟成员的意大利王国和奥匈帝国都在外交上卷入了阿尔巴尼亚民族问题。尽管这两个大国在地缘政治上互为对手,但它们都愿意承担共同赞助未来独立的阿尔巴尼亚国家的责任。有时,维也纳和罗马试图帮助阿尔巴尼亚人的民族主义冲动,包括那些自15世纪后期以来定居在意大利的意大利-阿尔巴尼亚社区(称为Arbëresh)。本文研究了在1895年至1897年间,奥匈帝国和意大利如何在各自的外交政策中试图获得意大利-阿尔巴尼亚人的支持。在19世纪后期,来自这些社区的不同知识分子为一个独立的阿尔巴尼亚设想了民族主义计划。他们中的一些人得到了意大利政府机构的帝国主义部分的支持;其他国家则愿意合作,并与维也纳建立了更密切的联系。然而,尽管存在摩擦,这两个大国在控制阿尔巴尼亚民族主义运动方面成功地保持了它们相互竞争的利益之间的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hiperboreea
Hiperboreea HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
G. A. Loud (trans.). The Chronicle of Arnold of Lübeck Andreea Racleş. Textures of Belonging: Senses, Objects and Spaces of Romanian Roma Late Medieval Central Greece in Turmoil: Thessaly, Thirteenth to Fifteenth Centuries C.E. Establishing Relations with My Ideological Enemy: Polish People’s Republic and the Kingdom of Greece (1948–1974) Vlada Stanković, ed. Death, Illness, Body and Soul in Written and Visual Culture in Byzantium and Late Medieval Balkans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1