10 Decision analysis

Jim G. Thornton
{"title":"10 Decision analysis","authors":"Jim G. Thornton","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3552(96)80012-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper I have described a number of examples of the use of clinical decision analysis for guiding both individual patient decisions, and decisions for populations. The former is the only systematic way in which patients' preferences can be formally included in the decision. This is not always appropriate and it would be foolish to use decision analysis for many everyday clinical decisions. However, for difficult decisions, there are good reasons to believe that it will result in decisions that accord better with patient preferences than intuitive methods. Practitioners of evidence-based medicine will be looking for evidence from randomized controlled trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77031,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"10 4","pages":"Pages 677-695"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3552(96)80012-5","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950355296800125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper I have described a number of examples of the use of clinical decision analysis for guiding both individual patient decisions, and decisions for populations. The former is the only systematic way in which patients' preferences can be formally included in the decision. This is not always appropriate and it would be foolish to use decision analysis for many everyday clinical decisions. However, for difficult decisions, there are good reasons to believe that it will result in decisions that accord better with patient preferences than intuitive methods. Practitioners of evidence-based medicine will be looking for evidence from randomized controlled trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
10决策分析
在本文中,我描述了一些使用临床决策分析来指导个体患者决策和群体决策的例子。前者是唯一能够将患者的偏好正式纳入决策的系统方法。这并不总是合适的,在许多日常临床决策中使用决策分析是愚蠢的。然而,对于困难的决定,有充分的理由相信,它将导致比直觉方法更符合患者偏好的决定。循证医学的从业者将从随机对照试验中寻找证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prolapse. Vaginal hysterectomy. Contributors to this issue Preface 3 Adverse effects of luteinizing hormone on fertility: fact or fantasy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1