A Comparative Study on Safety and Efficacy of Caudal, Thoracic Epidural and Intra Venous Analgesia in Paediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Double Blind Randomised Trial

M. Vakamudi, Rajeshkumar Kodali, R. Karthekeyan, P. Thangavel, Kamalakannan Sambandham
{"title":"A Comparative Study on Safety and Efficacy of Caudal, Thoracic Epidural and Intra Venous Analgesia in Paediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Double Blind Randomised Trial","authors":"M. Vakamudi, Rajeshkumar Kodali, R. Karthekeyan, P. Thangavel, Kamalakannan Sambandham","doi":"10.4236/wjcs.2020.107013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:Regional anaesthesia combined \nwith general anaesthesia reduces stress response to \nsurgery, duration of ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and promotes early recovery. Studies on \nthoracic epidural, caudal analgesia along with general anaesthesia (GA) in paediatric cardiac surgery are \nlimited hence we aimed to compare efficacy \nand safety of caudal, thoracic epidural and intravenous analgesia in \npaediatric cardiac surgery. Methodology: This study was conducted in the \nDepartment of Anaesthesiology in a tertiary care teaching hospital in southern \nIndia from February 2019 to December 2019. 90 children were randomised into \ngroup A, group B, group C. Children in group A received caudal analgesia along \nwith GA. Group B children received thoracic epidural along with GA. Group C \npatients received intravenous analgesia along with GA. Rescue analgesia 1 mcg/kg \nfentanyl given in all 3 groups if pain \nscore is more than 4. Primary outcome assessed was post-op pain scores. Secondary outcome assessed \nwas duration of ventilation, duration of intensive care unit stay. Results: All patients were comparable in terms of age, sex, weight, mean RACHS score, baseline heart rate and blood pressure. Pain \nscores were significantly lower in \nthoracic epidural group compared to other two grou ps. Duration of \nventilation was lower in thoracic epidural group (91.17± 43.85) minutes and caudal (199.6 ± 723.59) minutes compared to intravenous analgesia \ngroups (436.37 ± 705.51) \nminutes. Duration of ICU stay was significantly low in thoracic epidural group \n(2.73 ± 0.69) days compared to \ncaudal (3.7 ± 2.8) and \nintravenous analgesia groups (4.33 ± 0.920). We didn’t have any \ncomplications like hematoma, transient or permanent neurological sequelae in \nregional anesthesia groups. Conclusion: Regional anaesthesia along with general \nanaesthesia was more effective in pain relief than intravenous analgesia with \ngeneral anaesthesia in paediatric cardiac surgery.","PeriodicalId":23646,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcs.2020.107013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:Regional anaesthesia combined with general anaesthesia reduces stress response to surgery, duration of ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and promotes early recovery. Studies on thoracic epidural, caudal analgesia along with general anaesthesia (GA) in paediatric cardiac surgery are limited hence we aimed to compare efficacy and safety of caudal, thoracic epidural and intravenous analgesia in paediatric cardiac surgery. Methodology: This study was conducted in the Department of Anaesthesiology in a tertiary care teaching hospital in southern India from February 2019 to December 2019. 90 children were randomised into group A, group B, group C. Children in group A received caudal analgesia along with GA. Group B children received thoracic epidural along with GA. Group C patients received intravenous analgesia along with GA. Rescue analgesia 1 mcg/kg fentanyl given in all 3 groups if pain score is more than 4. Primary outcome assessed was post-op pain scores. Secondary outcome assessed was duration of ventilation, duration of intensive care unit stay. Results: All patients were comparable in terms of age, sex, weight, mean RACHS score, baseline heart rate and blood pressure. Pain scores were significantly lower in thoracic epidural group compared to other two grou ps. Duration of ventilation was lower in thoracic epidural group (91.17± 43.85) minutes and caudal (199.6 ± 723.59) minutes compared to intravenous analgesia groups (436.37 ± 705.51) minutes. Duration of ICU stay was significantly low in thoracic epidural group (2.73 ± 0.69) days compared to caudal (3.7 ± 2.8) and intravenous analgesia groups (4.33 ± 0.920). We didn’t have any complications like hematoma, transient or permanent neurological sequelae in regional anesthesia groups. Conclusion: Regional anaesthesia along with general anaesthesia was more effective in pain relief than intravenous analgesia with general anaesthesia in paediatric cardiac surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿心脏手术中尾侧、胸侧硬膜外和静脉内镇痛的安全性和有效性比较:一项双盲随机试验
导读:区域麻醉与全身麻醉相结合可减少手术应激反应、通气时间、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间,促进早期恢复。关于胸椎、胸椎硬膜外镇痛和全身麻醉在小儿心脏手术中的应用研究有限,因此我们旨在比较胸椎、胸椎硬膜外和静脉内镇痛在小儿心脏手术中的疗效和安全性。方法:本研究于2019年2月至2019年12月在印度南部一家三级护理教学医院的麻醉科进行。90例患儿随机分为A组、B组、c组。A组患儿在服用GA的同时给予尾侧镇痛。B组患儿行胸椎硬膜外加GA。C组患者在GA治疗的同时给予静脉镇痛。疼痛评分大于4时,三组均给予芬太尼1 mcg/kg抢救镇痛。评估的主要结局是术后疼痛评分。评估的次要结局是通气时间、重症监护病房住院时间。结果:所有患者在年龄、性别、体重、平均RACHS评分、基线心率和血压方面具有可比性。胸段硬膜外组疼痛评分明显低于其他两组,通气时间(91.17±43.85)min、尾段(199.6±723.59)min低于静脉镇痛组(436.37±705.51)min。胸段硬膜外组ICU住院时间(2.73±0.69)d明显低于尾段组(3.7±2.8)d和静脉镇痛组(4.33±0.920)d。在区域麻醉组中,我们没有任何并发症,如血肿,短暂或永久的神经系统后遗症。结论:在小儿心脏手术中,局部麻醉加全身麻醉比静脉麻醉加全身麻醉更能有效缓解疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute Myocardial Infarction: Mode of Revelation of a Left Atrium Myxoma Cardiac Manifestations with Chemotherapeutic Agents: 5 Fluorouracil-Induced Coronary Artery Vasospasm Microbiological and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Level Hospital in Nepal Cardiovascular Function during First 24 Hours after Off-Pump and On-Pump CABG—A Prospective Observational Comparative Study Is Anticoagulation Warranted after Left Atrial Appendage Ligation in Patients at Risk for Stroke after Cardiac Surgery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1