Contextual, Radiological Anatomy (RA) Learning needs Evaluation for Curricular Improvement

Reshma Mohamed Ansari, Hong Wei Han, Sarah Idris, Atikah Abdul Latiff
{"title":"Contextual, Radiological Anatomy (RA) Learning needs Evaluation for Curricular Improvement","authors":"Reshma Mohamed Ansari, Hong Wei Han, Sarah Idris, Atikah Abdul Latiff","doi":"10.31436/imjm.v22i2.2148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: As a part of the MBBS curriculum review exercise, University of Cyberjaya (UoC), Malaysia had come up with a study to investigate the feedback and learning needs pertaining to radiological anatomy (RA) in pre-clinical teaching. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-institutional survey of all five-year medical students was done using an adapted instrument which had both open and close-ended questions on the radiological anatomy teaching received so far and the perception on the teaching methods and content. 405 respondents out of 503 (80%) (year 1=115, year 2= 78, year 3=79, year 4=78, year 5=55) replied. There were totally 136 male and 269 female respondents. RESULTS: Though the overall student learning time (SLT) was adequate, year 3 students (62%) reported inadequate radiological anatomy SLT. Pre[1]clinical students (57.5%) reported more of formal radiological anatomy teaching while clinical students indicated informal teaching (Informal: 15.1 %, Even mix of formal and informal: 56.6 %). Female students reported higher response of adequate SLT (69.1%) and formal teaching (46.9%) compared to males. Small group learning such as gross anatomy practical sessions, problem-based learning, clinical skills teaching, and clinical correlates sessions were recommended. Abdomen and thorax were the most preferred regions where radiological anatomy could be explored further. X-ray followed by CT and MRI were the most favoured radiological modalities to learn topographical anatomy. CONCLUSION: The study provided sound feedback on the existing radiological anatomy teaching practices. Data shows stark contrast between the needs of the students and the current practices indicating that it is quite substantial for curriculum review.","PeriodicalId":13474,"journal":{"name":"IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31436/imjm.v22i2.2148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: As a part of the MBBS curriculum review exercise, University of Cyberjaya (UoC), Malaysia had come up with a study to investigate the feedback and learning needs pertaining to radiological anatomy (RA) in pre-clinical teaching. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-institutional survey of all five-year medical students was done using an adapted instrument which had both open and close-ended questions on the radiological anatomy teaching received so far and the perception on the teaching methods and content. 405 respondents out of 503 (80%) (year 1=115, year 2= 78, year 3=79, year 4=78, year 5=55) replied. There were totally 136 male and 269 female respondents. RESULTS: Though the overall student learning time (SLT) was adequate, year 3 students (62%) reported inadequate radiological anatomy SLT. Pre[1]clinical students (57.5%) reported more of formal radiological anatomy teaching while clinical students indicated informal teaching (Informal: 15.1 %, Even mix of formal and informal: 56.6 %). Female students reported higher response of adequate SLT (69.1%) and formal teaching (46.9%) compared to males. Small group learning such as gross anatomy practical sessions, problem-based learning, clinical skills teaching, and clinical correlates sessions were recommended. Abdomen and thorax were the most preferred regions where radiological anatomy could be explored further. X-ray followed by CT and MRI were the most favoured radiological modalities to learn topographical anatomy. CONCLUSION: The study provided sound feedback on the existing radiological anatomy teaching practices. Data shows stark contrast between the needs of the students and the current practices indicating that it is quite substantial for curriculum review.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景,放射解剖学(RA)学习需要评估课程改进
简介:作为MBBS课程审查的一部分,马来西亚赛城大学(UoC)提出了一项研究,调查临床前教学中有关放射解剖学(RA)的反馈和学习需求。材料与方法:采用一种改进的仪器对所有五年制医学生进行了单机构调查,对迄今为止接受的放射解剖学教学以及对教学方法和内容的看法进行了开放式和封闭式的提问。503名受访者中有405人(80%)(1年=115人,2年=78人,3年=79人,4年=78人,5年=55人)回答了问题。共有136名男性和269名女性受访者。结果:虽然总体学生学习时间(SLT)充足,但三年级学生(62%)报告放射解剖学SLT不足。临床预科[1]学生接受正规放射解剖学教学较多(57.5%),而临床生接受非正规教学较多(非正规:15.1%,正规与非正规混合:56.6%)。女生对适当的辅助教学(69.1%)和正规教学(46.9%)的反应高于男生。建议进行小组学习,如大体解剖实践课程、基于问题的学习、临床技能教学和临床相关课程。腹部和胸部是可以进一步探索放射解剖学的首选区域。x线、CT和MRI是学习地形解剖学最有利的放射方式。结论:本研究对现有放射解剖学教学实践提供了良好的反馈。数据显示,学生的需求与目前的做法形成了鲜明的对比,表明课程审查是相当可观的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Post-traumatic, Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Symptoms among Malaysian Firefighters “You Know How People Talk,” Reasons Behind Child Marriage among Female Youth in The North-Eastern State of West Malaysia Holistic Management of Diabetic Foot: Redefining Strategy Microbiome Dysbiosis in Depression: A Narrative Review Effectiveness of Hypertonic Saline, Polidocanol, and Glycerol as Sclerosing Agent: An Experimental Study in Javan Rabbits (Lepus nigricollis)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1