International Employment Cases Post-Brexit: Choice of Law, Territorial Scope, Jurisdiction and Enforcement

IF 1.6 4区 社会学 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Industrial Law Journal Pub Date : 2021-08-27 DOI:10.1093/indlaw/dwab019
L. Merrett
{"title":"International Employment Cases Post-Brexit: Choice of Law, Territorial Scope, Jurisdiction and Enforcement","authors":"L. Merrett","doi":"10.1093/indlaw/dwab019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The globalisation of employment relationships means that the international aspects of employment law are important in an ever growing number of cases. In particular, international employment cases may raise issues relating to international jurisdiction, choice of law and territorial scope. Before the UK left the EU, directly effective EU Regulations regulating jurisdiction and choice of law provided the rules which are applied in a large number of cases. This article outlines the changes post-Brexit and the resulting overlapping regimes which now govern international employment cases. The choice of law rules in the Rome I Regulation and Rome II Regulation remain as part of retained EU law. International jurisdiction will now be governed entirely by national law rules. However, for cases in the High Court, the common law rules are amended to mirror the provisions which are previously applied under the Brussels I Regulation recast. Although in many cases the rules look the same, different principles of interpretation will apply, and, longer term, now that the rules are not binding as matter of EU there will be scope to amend and reform the rules.","PeriodicalId":45482,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Law Journal","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwab019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The globalisation of employment relationships means that the international aspects of employment law are important in an ever growing number of cases. In particular, international employment cases may raise issues relating to international jurisdiction, choice of law and territorial scope. Before the UK left the EU, directly effective EU Regulations regulating jurisdiction and choice of law provided the rules which are applied in a large number of cases. This article outlines the changes post-Brexit and the resulting overlapping regimes which now govern international employment cases. The choice of law rules in the Rome I Regulation and Rome II Regulation remain as part of retained EU law. International jurisdiction will now be governed entirely by national law rules. However, for cases in the High Court, the common law rules are amended to mirror the provisions which are previously applied under the Brussels I Regulation recast. Although in many cases the rules look the same, different principles of interpretation will apply, and, longer term, now that the rules are not binding as matter of EU there will be scope to amend and reform the rules.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国脱欧后的国际雇佣案件:法律选择、属地范围、管辖权和执行
雇佣关系的全球化意味着雇佣法的国际方面在越来越多的情况下是重要的。特别是,国际就业案件可能引起有关国际管辖权、法律选择和领土范围的问题。在英国脱离欧盟之前,直接有效的欧盟关于管辖权和法律选择的法规提供了大量适用于案件的规则。本文概述了英国脱欧后的变化以及由此产生的管理国际就业案件的重叠制度。《罗马1条例》和《罗马2条例》中法律规则的选择仍然是保留的欧盟法律的一部分。国际司法现在将完全由国家法律规则管辖。然而,在高等法院审理的案件中,普通法规则被修订,以反映先前在修订后的《布鲁塞尔I规例》下适用的条款。虽然在许多情况下,规则看起来是一样的,但不同的解释原则将适用,而且,从长远来看,既然这些规则对欧盟没有约束力,就会有修改和改革规则的余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Industrial Law Journal is established as the leading periodical in its field, providing comment and in-depth analysis on a wide range of topics relating to employment law. It is essential reading for practising lawyers, academics, and lay industrial relations experts to keep abreast of newly enacted legislation and proposals for law reform. In addition Industrial Law Journal carries commentary on relevant government publications and reviews of books relating to labour law.
期刊最新文献
Less or More Labour Law for Social Change? Procurement and the ‘London Living Wage’: Boohene v Royal Parks Ltd Domino Dancing: Mutuality of Obligation and Determining Employment Status in Ireland The Problems and Paradoxes with the EU’s Regulation of Traineeships: A Way Forward ‘Fire and Rehire’: Four Lessons from Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1