Fault Injection in Actuator Models for Testing of Automated Driving Functions

H. Holzmann, V. Landersheim, Udo Piram, R. Bartolozzi, G. Stoll, H. Atzrodt
{"title":"Fault Injection in Actuator Models for Testing of Automated Driving Functions","authors":"H. Holzmann, V. Landersheim, Udo Piram, R. Bartolozzi, G. Stoll, H. Atzrodt","doi":"10.3390/vehicles5010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, a simulation framework for virtual testing of autonomous driving functions under the influence of a fault occurring in a component is presented. The models consist of trajectory planning, motion control, models of actuator management, actuators and vehicle dynamics. Fault-handling tests in a right-turn maneuver are described, subject to an injected fault in the steering system. Different scenarios are discussed without and with a fault and without and with counteractions against the fault. The results of five scenarios for different criticality metrics are discussed. In the case of a fault without a counteraction, a pronounced lateral position deviation of the ego vehicle from the reference curve is observed. Furthermore, the minimal and hence most critical time-to-collision (TTC) and post-encroachment time (PET) values are calculated for each scenario together with a parameter variation of the initial position of a traffic agent. The minimum TTC values are lowest in the case of a fault without counteraction. For the lateral position deviation and the TTC, the counteractions cause reduced criticality that can become even lower than in the case without a fault, corresponding to a decrease in the dynamic behavior of the vehicle. For the PET, only in the case of a fault without counteraction, a non-zero value can be calculated. With the implemented testing toolchain, the automated vehicle and the reaction of the HAD function in non-standard conditions with reduced performance can be investigated. This can be used to test the influence of component faults on automated driving functions and help increase acceptance of implemented counteractions as part of the HAD function. The assessment of the situation using a combination of metrics is shown to be useful, as the different metrics can become critical in different situations.","PeriodicalId":73282,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles5010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this work, a simulation framework for virtual testing of autonomous driving functions under the influence of a fault occurring in a component is presented. The models consist of trajectory planning, motion control, models of actuator management, actuators and vehicle dynamics. Fault-handling tests in a right-turn maneuver are described, subject to an injected fault in the steering system. Different scenarios are discussed without and with a fault and without and with counteractions against the fault. The results of five scenarios for different criticality metrics are discussed. In the case of a fault without a counteraction, a pronounced lateral position deviation of the ego vehicle from the reference curve is observed. Furthermore, the minimal and hence most critical time-to-collision (TTC) and post-encroachment time (PET) values are calculated for each scenario together with a parameter variation of the initial position of a traffic agent. The minimum TTC values are lowest in the case of a fault without counteraction. For the lateral position deviation and the TTC, the counteractions cause reduced criticality that can become even lower than in the case without a fault, corresponding to a decrease in the dynamic behavior of the vehicle. For the PET, only in the case of a fault without counteraction, a non-zero value can be calculated. With the implemented testing toolchain, the automated vehicle and the reaction of the HAD function in non-standard conditions with reduced performance can be investigated. This can be used to test the influence of component faults on automated driving functions and help increase acceptance of implemented counteractions as part of the HAD function. The assessment of the situation using a combination of metrics is shown to be useful, as the different metrics can become critical in different situations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于自动驾驶功能测试的致动器模型故障注入
在这项工作中,提出了一个在组件发生故障影响下自动驾驶功能虚拟测试的仿真框架。该模型包括轨迹规划模型、运动控制模型、执行器管理模型、执行器模型和车辆动力学模型。描述了在转向系统中注入故障的情况下,右转机动中的故障处理测试。讨论了没有和有故障以及没有和有针对故障的反作用力的不同场景。讨论了不同临界度量的五种方案的结果。在没有反作用力的故障情况下,观察到自我车辆与参考曲线的明显横向位置偏差。此外,计算了每个场景的最小和最关键碰撞时间(TTC)和后侵占时间(PET)值,以及交通代理初始位置的参数变化。在无对抗故障的情况下,TTC最小值最小。对于横向位置偏差和TTC,反作用力降低了临界性,甚至比没有故障的情况下更低,从而降低了车辆的动态性能。对于PET,只有在没有反作用的故障情况下,才能计算出非零值。利用所实现的测试工具链,可以研究自动驾驶车辆以及HAD功能在非标准条件下的反应。这可用于测试组件故障对自动驾驶功能的影响,并有助于提高作为HAD功能一部分的实现反作用力的接受度。使用指标组合对情况进行评估是有用的,因为不同的指标在不同的情况下可能变得至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Feedback Field-Weakening Techniques for Synchronous Machines with Permanent Magnets Synthetic Drivers’ Performance Measures Related to Vehicle Dynamics to Control Road Safety in Curves Diesel Particle Filter Requirements for Euro 7 Technology Continuously Regenerating Heavy-Duty Applications Hybridisation Concept of Light Vehicles Utilising an Electrified Planetary Gear Set A Co-Simulation Platform with Tire and Brake Thermal Model for the Analysis and Reproduction of Blanking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1