Book Review: Working Democracies: Managing Inequality in Worker Cooperatives, by Joan S. M. Meyers

IF 2.9 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR ILR Review Pub Date : 2022-08-24 DOI:10.1177/00197939221120815
Nicos Moushouttas
{"title":"Book Review: Working Democracies: Managing Inequality in Worker Cooperatives, by Joan S. M. Meyers","authors":"Nicos Moushouttas","doi":"10.1177/00197939221120815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"mobilizations. Despite the citations from interviews, we cannot learn more about the biographical and demographical information on the interviewees. The author mentions the role of the migrant workers (especially in the Brazilian cases) and the inequalities concerning female workers (especially in the Indian cases). However, he focuses mainly on their status (contract or permanent), leaving the reader to wonder about the individual profiles of some of these workers (age, gender, ethnicity, family, education, and so forth). Who strikes and who does not? Some portraits of workers could have been useful to provide more information on which workers participated in strikes and mobilizations. Nonetheless, the book achieves and goes beyond its goals through a final discussion on what to do with the analysis of strikes and what happens after strikes. The author tries to answer the question of how the study of strikes in specific sectors and countries could contribute to the general literature on capitalism, right wing movements, and authoritarian regimes. By doing this, he puts into question the research that focuses on the limits of trade unions and that claims the trade unions no longer serve workers’ interests and/or are no longer capable of playing an important role in contentious politics. He states that the trade union format has been successful when it combined with other forms of organization. Nowak provides insight on the relations between trade unions and other types of social movements. His conclusions offer new perspectives to researchers who are working on recent mobilizations in europe, such as the Gilets Jaunes (yellow vests) movement. Unlike the literature criticizing the trade unions’ strategies on the one hand and promoting the Gilets Jaunes as a new actor representing working-class interests on the other, Nowak’s results on the Indian and the Brazilian strikes between 2010 and 2014 underline the relevance of the articulation of workplace conflicts with class relations beyond the workplace and with nonclass relations as it results in greater popular power.","PeriodicalId":13504,"journal":{"name":"ILR Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"468 - 470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ILR Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939221120815","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

mobilizations. Despite the citations from interviews, we cannot learn more about the biographical and demographical information on the interviewees. The author mentions the role of the migrant workers (especially in the Brazilian cases) and the inequalities concerning female workers (especially in the Indian cases). However, he focuses mainly on their status (contract or permanent), leaving the reader to wonder about the individual profiles of some of these workers (age, gender, ethnicity, family, education, and so forth). Who strikes and who does not? Some portraits of workers could have been useful to provide more information on which workers participated in strikes and mobilizations. Nonetheless, the book achieves and goes beyond its goals through a final discussion on what to do with the analysis of strikes and what happens after strikes. The author tries to answer the question of how the study of strikes in specific sectors and countries could contribute to the general literature on capitalism, right wing movements, and authoritarian regimes. By doing this, he puts into question the research that focuses on the limits of trade unions and that claims the trade unions no longer serve workers’ interests and/or are no longer capable of playing an important role in contentious politics. He states that the trade union format has been successful when it combined with other forms of organization. Nowak provides insight on the relations between trade unions and other types of social movements. His conclusions offer new perspectives to researchers who are working on recent mobilizations in europe, such as the Gilets Jaunes (yellow vests) movement. Unlike the literature criticizing the trade unions’ strategies on the one hand and promoting the Gilets Jaunes as a new actor representing working-class interests on the other, Nowak’s results on the Indian and the Brazilian strikes between 2010 and 2014 underline the relevance of the articulation of workplace conflicts with class relations beyond the workplace and with nonclass relations as it results in greater popular power.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:《工作中的民主:管理工人合作社中的不平等》,作者:琼·s·m·迈耶斯
管理者。尽管引用了采访,但我们无法了解更多关于受访者的传记和人口统计信息。作者提到了移徙工人的作用(特别是在巴西的情况下)和女工的不平等(特别是在印度的情况下)。然而,他主要关注的是他们的地位(合同或永久),让读者想知道这些工人的个人概况(年龄、性别、种族、家庭、教育等)。谁打,谁不打?一些工人画像可能有助于提供更多关于哪些工人参加了罢工和动员的信息。尽管如此,这本书通过最后讨论如何处理罢工分析和罢工后发生的事情,达到并超越了它的目标。作者试图回答这样一个问题:对特定部门和国家的罢工的研究如何有助于资本主义、右翼运动和威权政权的一般文献。通过这样做,他对那些关注工会局限性的研究提出了质疑,这些研究声称工会不再为工人的利益服务,并且/或者不再能够在有争议的政治中发挥重要作用。他说,工会形式同其他形式的组织结合起来是成功的。诺瓦克对工会和其他类型的社会运动之间的关系提供了深刻的见解。他的结论为研究欧洲最近发生的运动(如黄背心运动)的研究人员提供了新的视角。与一方面批评工会策略,另一方面促进黄马甲运动作为代表工人阶级利益的新演员的文献不同,诺瓦克对2010年至2014年印度和巴西罢工的研究结果强调了工作场所冲突与工作场所之外的阶级关系以及非阶级关系的关联,因为它导致了更大的大众权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ILR Review
ILR Review INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Issued quarterly since October 1947, the Industrial and Labor Relations Review is a leading interdisciplinary journal publishing original research on all aspects of the employment relationship. The journal also publishes reviews of some 30 books per year. This site offers an index of all articles and book reviews published since 1947, abstracts of all articles, and information about upcoming issues. At the "All Articles" and "All Book Reviews" pages, visitors can search on titles and authors. Use this site, too, to learn about upcoming articles and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Alt-Labor and the New Politics of Workers’ Rights. By Daniel J. Galvin Variations of Freelancers’ “Effort-Bargain” Experiences in Platform Work: The Role of Skills The Europeanization of Wage Policy and Its Consequences for Labor Politics: The Case of Ireland The Changing Skill Content of Private-Sector Union Coverage The Economics of Immigration: A Festschrift in Honor of George J. Borjas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1