Do aphids maintain differential densities on plant parts? A case study with Aphis craccivora Koch (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

J. Srikanth
{"title":"Do aphids maintain differential densities on plant parts? A case study with Aphis craccivora Koch (Hemiptera: Aphididae)","authors":"J. Srikanth","doi":"10.33307/entomon.v47i3.756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differential aggregation of aphids on host plant parts may indicate site-specific optimal densities for efficient utilization of plant parts, besides the usual inference of preferential colonization. Differential densities of aphids within the plant  were studied using the legume aphid Aphis craccivora Koch in cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. ssp. unguiculata. In field-collected infested sample stems and pods (n=60), colonies were demarcated, aphid colony size, length and circumference measured, and colony area and density calculated. The results indicated that colony dimensions and colony size were significantly higher in pod than in stem whereas colony density did not differ significantly between the two plant parts. Colony density was significantly higher in leaflets of top most leaf than in leaflets of top 2nd or 3rd leaf. Overall, the four plant parts could be graded in the descending order as stem>pod>leaflets of top most leaf> leaflets of top 2nd or 3rd leaf for colony density. Significant positive curvilinear and linear relationship between colony size and colony density in both stem and pod indicated that A. craccivora showed a propensity to spread out colonies at low populations but tended to compact them with a rise in population levels. Identical colony density in stem and pod suggested that the aphid may not require differential densities to overcome host defenses or utilize food from these two plant parts. In top most leaf and top 2nd or 3rd leaf, finite leaflet size apparently limits proliferation of the aphid. Higher density on top immature leaves could be more an outcome of nutritional suitability than the need to overcome host defenses. Variable colony densities on the four parts of V. unguiculata indicated differential optimal densities.","PeriodicalId":87603,"journal":{"name":"Entomon; internationale Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Insektenkunde","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entomon; internationale Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Insektenkunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33307/entomon.v47i3.756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Differential aggregation of aphids on host plant parts may indicate site-specific optimal densities for efficient utilization of plant parts, besides the usual inference of preferential colonization. Differential densities of aphids within the plant  were studied using the legume aphid Aphis craccivora Koch in cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. ssp. unguiculata. In field-collected infested sample stems and pods (n=60), colonies were demarcated, aphid colony size, length and circumference measured, and colony area and density calculated. The results indicated that colony dimensions and colony size were significantly higher in pod than in stem whereas colony density did not differ significantly between the two plant parts. Colony density was significantly higher in leaflets of top most leaf than in leaflets of top 2nd or 3rd leaf. Overall, the four plant parts could be graded in the descending order as stem>pod>leaflets of top most leaf> leaflets of top 2nd or 3rd leaf for colony density. Significant positive curvilinear and linear relationship between colony size and colony density in both stem and pod indicated that A. craccivora showed a propensity to spread out colonies at low populations but tended to compact them with a rise in population levels. Identical colony density in stem and pod suggested that the aphid may not require differential densities to overcome host defenses or utilize food from these two plant parts. In top most leaf and top 2nd or 3rd leaf, finite leaflet size apparently limits proliferation of the aphid. Higher density on top immature leaves could be more an outcome of nutritional suitability than the need to overcome host defenses. Variable colony densities on the four parts of V. unguiculata indicated differential optimal densities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蚜虫在植物各部位是否保持不同的密度?克拉科蚜虫个案研究(半翅目:蚜虫科)
蚜虫在寄主植物部位上的不同聚集可能表明,除了通常的优先定植推断外,植物部位的有效利用可能取决于特定地点的最佳密度。采用豆科蚜虫(Aphis craccivora Koch)在豇豆(Vigna unguiculata, L.)中研究了植物内蚜虫密度的差异。Walp。ssp。unguiculata。对田间采集的侵染样茎和荚果(n=60)进行菌落标定,测定蚜虫菌落大小、长度和周长,计算菌落面积和密度。结果表明,荚果的菌落尺寸和大小均显著高于茎,而两部分间的菌落密度差异不显著。最顶部叶片的菌落密度显著高于顶部第2和第3叶片。总体而言,4个植株部位的菌落密度由大到小依次为茎>荚果>最顶端叶小叶>顶部2、3叶小叶。茎和荚果的群体大小与群体密度呈显著的正曲线关系和显著的线性关系,这表明在种群数量较少的情况下,克拉科拉的群体有向外扩展的趋势,但随着种群数量的增加,群体密度趋于紧凑。茎和荚果中相同的菌落密度表明蚜虫可能不需要不同的密度来克服寄主的防御或利用这两个植物部分的食物。在最顶部叶片和顶部第2或第3叶片上,有限的小叶大小明显限制了蚜虫的增殖。未成熟叶片顶部较高的密度可能更多是营养适宜性的结果,而不是克服寄主防御的需要。不同的菌落密度表明不同的最佳密度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
New distributional records of six Aphodiinae species (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) from south India Diversity and distribution of true flies (Diptera) of Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary, Odisha, India: Functional roles based on ecological guilds Studies on biology and preference of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on different host plants and evaluation of botanicals for its management A checklist of robber flies (Diptera, Asilidae) of Kerala, India Distributional records of Onthophagus germanus Gillet, 1927 and Onthophagus orissanus Arrow, 1931(Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae) from south India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1