O9 Intensive interprofessional ED team simulation for COVID-19 preparedness

M. Elsheikh, Catherine Holmes, A. Davies
{"title":"O9 Intensive interprofessional ED team simulation for COVID-19 preparedness","authors":"M. Elsheikh, Catherine Holmes, A. Davies","doi":"10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The ‘LeedsEDSim’ team have run an embedded in-situ simulation (ISS) programme successfully for 6 years involving at least twice weekly interprofessional ISS in the Emergency Departments (ED). In March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic meant there were multiple changes to clinical processes and guidelines, the physical layout of departments and patient flow through them. This caused heightened anxiety amongst all staff members and potential threats to patient safety. Most larger educational events and regional training had been cancelled due to predicted clinical demand and need for social distancing. ISS was already active and embedded as an educational tool for all professions in the ED for clinical as well as non-clinical skills and was therefore utilised as the central education strategy for the intensive programme. Summary of Work A mixture of interprofessional ISS (at least twice weekly) and short ISS group drills (up to six per day) were used with the aim of having all staff members take part in at least one over a period of 7 weeks. Faculty included clinical staff who were on the shop floor anyway, with the usual non -patient facing education staff and technicians avoiding clinical areas as per social distancing rules. This was all coordinated by the ED simulation fellow. Larger interprofessional simulations took place in the ‘cold’ resuscitation areas involving other teams such as intensive care and infectious diseases - these dealt with the full process and guidelines of managing unwell COVID-19 patients, including the complexity of COVID-19 cardiac arrest scenarios. The simulation drills were designed to teach specific, targeted aspects of cases - eg. management of initial stages of cardiac arrest outside the resuscitation room, advanced care decision making, and communication with relatives in difficult circumstances. All scenarios ran multiple times, maximising multiple individual staff member exposure. Results 167 participants gave feedback after their session(see figure 1). Discussion and Conclusion As well as educating staff(with great success as per figure 1), both simulation drills and the larger ISS allowed the new developing system to be tested, identifying and correcting problems such as: missing kit in certain areas; how to get staff to the correct place in a timely manner and the creation of a cardiac arrest standard operating procedure. ISS has been shown to be a valuable tool for education and improving patient safety when used in an intensive programme to deal with novel, rapidly evolving situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The ‘LeedsEDSim’ team have run an embedded in-situ simulation (ISS) programme successfully for 6 years involving at least twice weekly interprofessional ISS in the Emergency Departments (ED). In March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic meant there were multiple changes to clinical processes and guidelines, the physical layout of departments and patient flow through them. This caused heightened anxiety amongst all staff members and potential threats to patient safety. Most larger educational events and regional training had been cancelled due to predicted clinical demand and need for social distancing. ISS was already active and embedded as an educational tool for all professions in the ED for clinical as well as non-clinical skills and was therefore utilised as the central education strategy for the intensive programme. Summary of Work A mixture of interprofessional ISS (at least twice weekly) and short ISS group drills (up to six per day) were used with the aim of having all staff members take part in at least one over a period of 7 weeks. Faculty included clinical staff who were on the shop floor anyway, with the usual non -patient facing education staff and technicians avoiding clinical areas as per social distancing rules. This was all coordinated by the ED simulation fellow. Larger interprofessional simulations took place in the ‘cold’ resuscitation areas involving other teams such as intensive care and infectious diseases - these dealt with the full process and guidelines of managing unwell COVID-19 patients, including the complexity of COVID-19 cardiac arrest scenarios. The simulation drills were designed to teach specific, targeted aspects of cases - eg. management of initial stages of cardiac arrest outside the resuscitation room, advanced care decision making, and communication with relatives in difficult circumstances. All scenarios ran multiple times, maximising multiple individual staff member exposure. Results 167 participants gave feedback after their session(see figure 1). Discussion and Conclusion As well as educating staff(with great success as per figure 1), both simulation drills and the larger ISS allowed the new developing system to be tested, identifying and correcting problems such as: missing kit in certain areas; how to get staff to the correct place in a timely manner and the creation of a cardiac arrest standard operating procedure. ISS has been shown to be a valuable tool for education and improving patient safety when used in an intensive programme to deal with novel, rapidly evolving situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O9针对COVID-19准备的密集跨专业ED团队模拟
“LeedsEDSim”团队已经成功地运行了一个嵌入式现场模拟(ISS)项目6年,每周至少两次在急诊科(ED)进行跨专业的现场模拟。2020年3月,新冠肺炎大流行意味着临床流程和指南、科室物理布局和患者流动都发生了多次变化。这加剧了所有工作人员的焦虑,并对患者安全构成了潜在威胁。由于预计的临床需求和保持社交距离的需要,大多数大型教育活动和区域培训已被取消。ISS已经成为ED所有专业的临床和非临床技能的教育工具,因此被用作强化课程的中心教育策略。工作总结采用专业间国际空间站(每周至少两次)和短期国际空间站小组演习(每天最多六次)的混合方式,目的是让所有工作人员在7周的时间内至少参加一次。教职员工包括在车间工作的临床工作人员,根据社交距离规定,通常不面向患者的教育工作人员和技术人员会避开临床区域。这些都是由ED模拟研究员协调的。在“冷”复苏领域进行了更大规模的跨专业模拟,涉及重症监护和传染病等其他团队,这些团队处理了管理身体不适的COVID-19患者的整个过程和指导方针,包括COVID-19心脏骤停场景的复杂性。模拟演练的目的是教授案例的具体、有针对性的方面。复苏室外心脏骤停初期阶段的管理,高级护理决策,以及在困难情况下与亲属的沟通。所有场景都运行多次,最大限度地提高了多个工作人员的暴露程度。167名参与者在会议结束后给出了反馈(见图1)。讨论和结论除了对工作人员进行教育(如图1所示取得了巨大成功),模拟演习和更大的国际空间站都允许对新开发的系统进行测试,识别和纠正问题,例如:某些区域缺少工具包;如何让员工及时到达正确的地点并制定心脏骤停的标准操作程序。国际空间站已被证明是教育和改善患者安全的宝贵工具,用于应对新型、快速发展的情况,如COVID-19大流行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Simulation-based Training on Reflective Practice. Virtual tabletop simulations for primary care pandemic preparedness and response. Developing a simulation programme to train airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary-level hospital. Interprofessional teamwork for managing medical deterioration in pregnancy: what contributes to good clinical performance in simulated practice? Age suit simulation replicates in healthy young adults the functional challenges to balance experienced by older adults: an observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1