Why Lenin failed to implement Marx’s concept of socialism: an accounting history of the Russian revolution, c.1917–1924

IF 0.8 Q4 BUSINESS Accounting History Review Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/21552851.2021.1875249
R. Bryer
{"title":"Why Lenin failed to implement Marx’s concept of socialism: an accounting history of the Russian revolution, c.1917–1924","authors":"R. Bryer","doi":"10.1080/21552851.2021.1875249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To orthodox Marxists socialism means central planning. Capitalist accounting is, however, integral to Marx’s socialism that envisages universal worker co-operatives, initially accountable to workers and society for value, but with the interim aim of increasing the ‘productive forces’ to make every labour hour ‘directly’ of equal social value. This study tests the implication that implementing Marx’s socialism requires understanding capitalist accounting by examining its role in the Russian revolution. Lenin failed, it argues, because he did not understand capitalist accounting, Marx’s explanation of it, or his interim aim. Lenin stressed accounting’s centrality, but equated it with budgeting, and confused Marx’s interim aim with Day 1, which led him to support ‘centralisation’ and ‘workers’ control’. Lenin admitted a ‘mistake’ in 1921 when he had understood, apparently intuitively, the necessity of accountability for profit, which underlay his ‘New Economic Policy’, the reintroduction of double-entry bookkeeping in 1922, and his 1923 vision of socialism built from co-operatives. Lenin failed to overcome his comrades’ orthodoxy, and after his death in 1924 Stalin dropped his ideas, which the study hypothesises had important implications for twentieth-century geopolitical history.","PeriodicalId":43233,"journal":{"name":"Accounting History Review","volume":"6 1","pages":"29 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21552851.2021.1875249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT To orthodox Marxists socialism means central planning. Capitalist accounting is, however, integral to Marx’s socialism that envisages universal worker co-operatives, initially accountable to workers and society for value, but with the interim aim of increasing the ‘productive forces’ to make every labour hour ‘directly’ of equal social value. This study tests the implication that implementing Marx’s socialism requires understanding capitalist accounting by examining its role in the Russian revolution. Lenin failed, it argues, because he did not understand capitalist accounting, Marx’s explanation of it, or his interim aim. Lenin stressed accounting’s centrality, but equated it with budgeting, and confused Marx’s interim aim with Day 1, which led him to support ‘centralisation’ and ‘workers’ control’. Lenin admitted a ‘mistake’ in 1921 when he had understood, apparently intuitively, the necessity of accountability for profit, which underlay his ‘New Economic Policy’, the reintroduction of double-entry bookkeeping in 1922, and his 1923 vision of socialism built from co-operatives. Lenin failed to overcome his comrades’ orthodoxy, and after his death in 1924 Stalin dropped his ideas, which the study hypothesises had important implications for twentieth-century geopolitical history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么列宁未能实现马克思的社会主义概念:1917 - 1924年俄国革命的会计史
对正统马克思主义者来说,社会主义意味着中央计划。然而,资本主义会计是马克思的社会主义不可或缺的一部分,马克思设想了普遍的工人合作社,最初对工人和社会负责,但其临时目标是增加“生产力”,使每一个劳动时间“直接”具有平等的社会价值。本研究通过考察资本主义会计在俄国革命中的作用来检验实现马克思的社会主义需要理解资本主义会计的含义。它认为,列宁之所以失败,是因为他不理解资本主义会计,不理解马克思对资本主义会计的解释,也不理解他的过渡目标。列宁强调会计的中心地位,但将其等同于预算,并将马克思的临时目标与“第一天”混为一谈,这导致他支持“中央集权”和“工人控制”。列宁在1921年承认了一个“错误”,当时他显然是凭直觉理解了对利润负责的必要性,这是他的“新经济政策”的基础,1922年重新引入复式记账法,1923年建立合作社的社会主义愿景。列宁未能克服同志们的正统思想,在1924年斯大林去世后,他放弃了自己的思想,该研究假设,这对20世纪的地缘政治历史有重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Accounting for sustainability in water supply: the case of the ‘Bottini Aqueduct’ in medieval times ‘American Bookkeeping’ in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries which was not American ‘Accounting for the Music’. Institutional logics in the Regio Teatro Carolino of Palermo at the beginning of the nineteenth century Reflections from the Editor’s Desk Measuring profit and performance, a cautionary tale: Birmingham Small Arms c.1911–c.1936
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1