Hybrid Fluid Flow Simulation Combining Full Physics Simulation and Artificial Intelligence

M. Mezghani, Mustafa AlIbrahim, M. Baddourah
{"title":"Hybrid Fluid Flow Simulation Combining Full Physics Simulation and Artificial Intelligence","authors":"M. Mezghani, Mustafa AlIbrahim, M. Baddourah","doi":"10.2118/204728-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Reservoir simulation is a key tool for predicting the dynamic behavior of the reservoir and optimizing its development. Fine scale CPU demanding simulation grids are necessary to improve the accuracy of the simulation results. We propose a hybrid modeling approach to minimize the weight of the full physics model by dynamically building and updating an artificial intelligence (AI) based model. The AI model can be used to quickly mimic the full physics (FP) model.\n The methodology that we propose consists of starting with running the FP model, an associated AI model is systematically updated using the newly performed FP runs. Once the mismatch between the two models is below a predefined cutoff the FP model is switch off and only the AI model is used. The FP model is switched on at the end of the exercise either to confirm the AI model decision and stop the study or to reject this decision (high mismatch between FP and AI model) and upgrade the AI model.\n The proposed workflow was applied to a synthetic reservoir model, where the objective is to match the average reservoir pressure. For this study, to better account for reservoir heterogeneity, fine scale simulation grid (approximately 50 million cells) is necessary to improve the accuracy of the reservoir simulation results. Reservoir simulation using FP model and 1024 CPUs requires approximately 14 hours. During this history matching exercise, six parameters have been selected to be part of the optimization loop. Therefore, a Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) using seven FP runs is used to initiate the hybrid approach and build the first AI model. During history matching, only the AI model is used. At the convergence of the optimization loop, a final FP model run is performed either to confirm the convergence for the FP model or to re iterate the same approach starting from the LHS around the converged solution. The following AI model will be updated using all the FP simulations done in the study. This approach allows the achievement of the history matching with very acceptable quality match, however with much less computational resources and CPU time.\n CPU intensive, multimillion-cell simulation models are commonly utilized in reservoir development. Completing a reservoir study in acceptable timeframe is a real challenge for such a situation. The development of new concepts/techniques is a real need to successfully complete a reservoir study. The hybrid approach that we are proposing is showing very promising results to handle such a challenge.","PeriodicalId":11094,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Mon, November 29, 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Mon, November 29, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/204728-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reservoir simulation is a key tool for predicting the dynamic behavior of the reservoir and optimizing its development. Fine scale CPU demanding simulation grids are necessary to improve the accuracy of the simulation results. We propose a hybrid modeling approach to minimize the weight of the full physics model by dynamically building and updating an artificial intelligence (AI) based model. The AI model can be used to quickly mimic the full physics (FP) model. The methodology that we propose consists of starting with running the FP model, an associated AI model is systematically updated using the newly performed FP runs. Once the mismatch between the two models is below a predefined cutoff the FP model is switch off and only the AI model is used. The FP model is switched on at the end of the exercise either to confirm the AI model decision and stop the study or to reject this decision (high mismatch between FP and AI model) and upgrade the AI model. The proposed workflow was applied to a synthetic reservoir model, where the objective is to match the average reservoir pressure. For this study, to better account for reservoir heterogeneity, fine scale simulation grid (approximately 50 million cells) is necessary to improve the accuracy of the reservoir simulation results. Reservoir simulation using FP model and 1024 CPUs requires approximately 14 hours. During this history matching exercise, six parameters have been selected to be part of the optimization loop. Therefore, a Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) using seven FP runs is used to initiate the hybrid approach and build the first AI model. During history matching, only the AI model is used. At the convergence of the optimization loop, a final FP model run is performed either to confirm the convergence for the FP model or to re iterate the same approach starting from the LHS around the converged solution. The following AI model will be updated using all the FP simulations done in the study. This approach allows the achievement of the history matching with very acceptable quality match, however with much less computational resources and CPU time. CPU intensive, multimillion-cell simulation models are commonly utilized in reservoir development. Completing a reservoir study in acceptable timeframe is a real challenge for such a situation. The development of new concepts/techniques is a real need to successfully complete a reservoir study. The hybrid approach that we are proposing is showing very promising results to handle such a challenge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全物理仿真与人工智能相结合的混合流体流动仿真
油藏模拟是预测油藏动态动态、优化开发的重要工具。为了提高仿真结果的准确性,需要采用高精度的CPU仿真网格。我们提出了一种混合建模方法,通过动态构建和更新基于人工智能(AI)的模型来最小化全物理模型的权重。AI模型可用于快速模拟全物理(FP)模型。我们提出的方法包括从运行计划生育模型开始,使用新执行的计划生育运行系统地更新相关的人工智能模型。一旦两个模型之间的不匹配低于预定义的截止值,FP模型就会被关闭,只使用AI模型。在练习结束时,FP模型被打开,以确认AI模型的决策并停止研究,或者拒绝该决策(FP和AI模型之间的高度不匹配)并升级AI模型。将提出的工作流程应用于合成油藏模型,其目标是匹配平均油藏压力。在本研究中,为了更好地解释储层非均质性,需要精细尺度的模拟网格(约5000万个单元)来提高储层模拟结果的准确性。使用FP模型和1024个cpu进行油藏模拟大约需要14个小时。在这个历史匹配过程中,选择了六个参数作为优化循环的一部分。因此,使用七个FP运行的拉丁超立方体采样(LHS)来启动混合方法并构建第一个人工智能模型。在历史匹配过程中,只使用AI模型。在优化循环的收敛处,执行最后的FP模型运行,以确认FP模型的收敛性,或者从LHS开始围绕收敛解决方案重复相同的方法。下面的人工智能模型将使用研究中完成的所有FP模拟进行更新。这种方法允许实现具有非常可接受的匹配质量的历史匹配,但是计算资源和CPU时间要少得多。在油藏开发中,通常采用CPU密集型、数百万单元的模拟模型。在这种情况下,在可接受的时间内完成油藏研究是一项真正的挑战。开发新概念/新技术是成功完成油藏研究的现实需要。我们提出的混合方法在处理这一挑战方面显示出非常有希望的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Leaders Can Shape the Oil & Gas Industry – Accelerating Innovations Through Business & Environmental Intelligent Systems High Performance Friction Reducer for Slickwater Fracturing Applications: Laboratory Study and Field Implementation CO2 Waterless Fracturing and Huff and Puff in Tight Oil Reservoir Switched Reluctance Motor for Electric Submersible Pump Sparse Water Fracture Channel Detection from Subsurface Sensors Via a Smart Orthogonal Matching Pursuit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1