Cortical bone screws constructive characteristics – A comparative study

A. Lugas, D. Aloj, D. Santoro, Vittoria Civilini, Simone Borrelli, C. Bignardi
{"title":"Cortical bone screws constructive characteristics – A comparative study","authors":"A. Lugas, D. Aloj, D. Santoro, Vittoria Civilini, Simone Borrelli, C. Bignardi","doi":"10.2495/cmem-v9-n4-283-295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Osteosynthesis is a surgical technique for the treatment of skeletal fractures through the implant of mechanical devices, such as plates and screws, in order to stabilize and fix the injured skeletal segment. It is preferred to the conservative treatment when the fracture requires immediate surgical correction or when, blocking the joints, degenerative changes could occur. Bone screws have different shapes and sizes depending on the intended use. In this study, six types of cortical bone screws were tested to determine the torque transmitted to the bone during the insertion. One Ti6Al4V tapered (Ø 6 mm) and five AISI 316L stainless steel – two straight (Ø 4 and 6 mm) and three tapered (Ø 4, 5, and 6 mm) – screws were used during the tests. Screws have been screwed into Sawbones (Sawbones® Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, USA) solid foam-type cylinders (external diameter 30 mm and thickness 3.5 mm) simulating the cortical bone diaphysis. Each of the 26 screws tested was inserted in a Sawbone cylinder five times, in five previously drawn equally spaced points, without any pilot holes. The experiment design was based on the ASTM standard for medical bone screws; two experienced orthopedic surgeons performed the insertions and removals of the screws using a hand-drill at 1 rev/s, aided by a metronome, and the torque was measured with a torsiometer throughout the tests. The mean and maximum torque resulted to be higher for larger diameter screws. Considering the same diameter, tapered screws showed a higher torque required for the extraction, which indicates stronger retention. However, in some cases, the Sawbones cylinder was fractured during the insertion of screws with a 6 mm diameter. Therefore, the use of medium-size tapered screws might be the most advisable compromise.","PeriodicalId":36958,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements","volume":"399 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/cmem-v9-n4-283-295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Osteosynthesis is a surgical technique for the treatment of skeletal fractures through the implant of mechanical devices, such as plates and screws, in order to stabilize and fix the injured skeletal segment. It is preferred to the conservative treatment when the fracture requires immediate surgical correction or when, blocking the joints, degenerative changes could occur. Bone screws have different shapes and sizes depending on the intended use. In this study, six types of cortical bone screws were tested to determine the torque transmitted to the bone during the insertion. One Ti6Al4V tapered (Ø 6 mm) and five AISI 316L stainless steel – two straight (Ø 4 and 6 mm) and three tapered (Ø 4, 5, and 6 mm) – screws were used during the tests. Screws have been screwed into Sawbones (Sawbones® Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, USA) solid foam-type cylinders (external diameter 30 mm and thickness 3.5 mm) simulating the cortical bone diaphysis. Each of the 26 screws tested was inserted in a Sawbone cylinder five times, in five previously drawn equally spaced points, without any pilot holes. The experiment design was based on the ASTM standard for medical bone screws; two experienced orthopedic surgeons performed the insertions and removals of the screws using a hand-drill at 1 rev/s, aided by a metronome, and the torque was measured with a torsiometer throughout the tests. The mean and maximum torque resulted to be higher for larger diameter screws. Considering the same diameter, tapered screws showed a higher torque required for the extraction, which indicates stronger retention. However, in some cases, the Sawbones cylinder was fractured during the insertion of screws with a 6 mm diameter. Therefore, the use of medium-size tapered screws might be the most advisable compromise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
皮质骨钉结构特点的比较研究
骨融合术是一种治疗骨骼骨折的外科技术,通过植入机械装置,如钢板和螺钉,以稳定和固定受伤的骨段。当骨折需要立即手术矫正或阻塞关节,可能发生退行性改变时,首选保守治疗。骨螺钉有不同的形状和大小,这取决于预期的用途。在本研究中,测试了六种皮质骨螺钉,以确定插入时传递到骨骼的扭矩。在测试期间使用了一个Ti6Al4V锥形(Ø 6毫米)和五个AISI 316L不锈钢-两个直(Ø 4和6毫米)和三个锥形(Ø 4、5和6毫米)螺钉。螺钉已拧入Sawbones (Sawbones®Pacific Research Laboratories, Inc., Vashon, USA)模拟皮质骨骨干的固体泡沫型圆柱体(外径30 mm,厚度3.5 mm)。测试的26个螺钉中的每一个都在锯骨圆柱体中插入5次,在之前绘制的5个等距点上,没有任何导孔。实验设计依据ASTM医用骨螺钉标准;两名经验丰富的骨科医生在节拍器的辅助下,使用手钻以1转/秒的速度插入和取出螺钉,并在整个测试过程中使用扭力计测量扭矩。螺纹直径越大,平均扭矩和最大扭矩越大。在直径相同的情况下,锥形螺钉的拔牙扭矩更高,固位力更强。然而,在某些情况下,在插入直径为6mm的螺钉期间,Sawbones柱发生骨折。因此,使用中等大小的锥形螺钉可能是最可取的折衷方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊最新文献
IndianFoodNet: Detecting Indian Food Items Using Deep Learning CFD Simulation of Premixed Flame in Counter Burner under the Influence of a Magnetic Field Chest Freezer Performance with Non-Condensable Gases Stress Distribution in Cantilever Beams with Different Hole Shapes: A Numerical Analysis Combined Impact of Joule Heating, Activation Energy, and Viscous Dissipation on Ternary Nanofluid Flow over Three Different Geometries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1