Premedication for surgery: a survey of Australian practice

R. Riley, W. Lim
{"title":"Premedication for surgery: a survey of Australian practice","authors":"R. Riley, W. Lim","doi":"10.1002/JPPR1999294206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To survey anaesthetists' premedication practices for adult surgical patients. Methods: With institutional approval, a survey questionnaire was given to anaesthetists in Western Australia during January-May 1995. The survey was anonymous and contained 16 questions. Seven responses were recorded using an anchored, 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Two clinical scenarios were described and respondents were asked to detail their use of premedication drugs. Participants: Consultant and trainee anaesthetists practising in Western Australia. Results: Completed forms were returned by 107 anaesthetists. Respondents were aged 27-63 yr (mean age 42 +/- 9 yr) and were grouped by staff position (77% consultant, 23% trainee), sex (85% male) and years of practice. In general, inpatients were visited on the day before surgery (VAS=86) but not always questioned about their anxiety (VAS=56). Anaesthetists believed that premedication itself was somewhat important (VAS=67) and that patients expect premedication drugs to be used more often than not (VAS=68). Anaesthetists considered the route of administration to be unimportant (VAS=31). Patients undergoing day case surgery had an even chance of receiving no premedication whereas inpatients were more likely to receive premedication. The main aims of premedication were considered to be anxiolysis (71%), to make the anesthetic experience more pleasant for the patient (50%) and to reduce aspiration risk (39%). The preferred drug for premedication was temazepam. Conclusion: Premedication remains a popular practice although there are diverse opinions on its aims. (author abstract)","PeriodicalId":22283,"journal":{"name":"The Australian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"PC-23 1","pages":"206-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/JPPR1999294206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To survey anaesthetists' premedication practices for adult surgical patients. Methods: With institutional approval, a survey questionnaire was given to anaesthetists in Western Australia during January-May 1995. The survey was anonymous and contained 16 questions. Seven responses were recorded using an anchored, 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Two clinical scenarios were described and respondents were asked to detail their use of premedication drugs. Participants: Consultant and trainee anaesthetists practising in Western Australia. Results: Completed forms were returned by 107 anaesthetists. Respondents were aged 27-63 yr (mean age 42 +/- 9 yr) and were grouped by staff position (77% consultant, 23% trainee), sex (85% male) and years of practice. In general, inpatients were visited on the day before surgery (VAS=86) but not always questioned about their anxiety (VAS=56). Anaesthetists believed that premedication itself was somewhat important (VAS=67) and that patients expect premedication drugs to be used more often than not (VAS=68). Anaesthetists considered the route of administration to be unimportant (VAS=31). Patients undergoing day case surgery had an even chance of receiving no premedication whereas inpatients were more likely to receive premedication. The main aims of premedication were considered to be anxiolysis (71%), to make the anesthetic experience more pleasant for the patient (50%) and to reduce aspiration risk (39%). The preferred drug for premedication was temazepam. Conclusion: Premedication remains a popular practice although there are diverse opinions on its aims. (author abstract)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术前用药:澳大利亚实践调查
目的:了解麻醉医师对成人外科病人的用药前操作情况。方法:经机构批准,于1995年1 - 5月对西澳地区麻醉医师进行问卷调查。该调查是匿名的,包含16个问题。使用锚定的100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录7个反应。描述了两种临床情景,并要求受访者详细说明其用药前药物的使用情况。参与者:在西澳大利亚执业的顾问麻醉师和实习麻醉师。结果:107名麻醉师填写了完整的表格。受访者年龄在27-63岁(平均年龄42 +/- 9岁),按员工职位(77%为顾问,23%为实习生)、性别(85%为男性)和执业年限进行分组。一般来说,住院患者在手术前一天被访问(VAS=86),但并不总是被问及他们的焦虑(VAS=56)。麻醉师认为用药前药物本身是很重要的(VAS=67),患者期望用药前药物的使用比不使用更频繁(VAS=68)。麻醉师认为给药途径不重要(VAS=31)。接受日间手术的患者有一半的机会没有接受预用药,而住院患者更有可能接受预用药。预用药的主要目的是缓解焦虑(71%),使患者麻醉体验更愉快(50%),降低误吸风险(39%)。用药前首选替马西泮。结论:药物前治疗仍然是一种流行的做法,尽管对其目的有不同的看法。(作者抽象)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The medication chart as an integral tool in the pharmaceutical care plan The PBS-Its Future Metered-Dose Inhaler with Spacer versus Nebuliser for Acute Exacerbation of Asthma-A Literature Review Fall-related hospital admissions in elderly patients: Contribution of medication use Management tool that allows comparison of pharmacy services. - editorial-
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1