Persistent Anosmia

IF 0.2 N/A PHILOSOPHY TPM-The Philosophers Magazine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5840/tpm20219222
Jean Kazez
{"title":"Persistent Anosmia","authors":"Jean Kazez","doi":"10.5840/tpm20219222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"John Stuart Mill famously maintained that “animal pleasures” – like enjoying good smells and tastes – are lower quality than the pleasures tied to higher cognition, like the pleasure of enjoying an opera or understanding a mathematical proof. This downgrading is particularly common in the ethical literature about eating animals. Peter Singer, James Rachels, Gary Francione, Alastair Norcross and dozens of other ethicists make quick work of defending vegetarianism by presuming that “gustatory pleasure” is trivial. But is it?","PeriodicalId":42886,"journal":{"name":"TPM-The Philosophers Magazine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TPM-The Philosophers Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/tpm20219222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

John Stuart Mill famously maintained that “animal pleasures” – like enjoying good smells and tastes – are lower quality than the pleasures tied to higher cognition, like the pleasure of enjoying an opera or understanding a mathematical proof. This downgrading is particularly common in the ethical literature about eating animals. Peter Singer, James Rachels, Gary Francione, Alastair Norcross and dozens of other ethicists make quick work of defending vegetarianism by presuming that “gustatory pleasure” is trivial. But is it?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持续的嗅觉缺失症
约翰·斯图亚特·密尔(John Stuart Mill)有一个著名的观点,他认为“动物的快乐”——比如享受美好的气味和味道——比那些与高级认知相关的快乐(比如欣赏歌剧或理解数学证明的快乐)的质量要低。这种降级在有关食用动物的伦理文献中尤为常见。彼得·辛格、詹姆斯·雷切尔斯、加里·弗朗西奥内、阿拉斯泰尔·诺克罗斯和其他几十位伦理学家迅速为素食主义辩护,他们认为“味觉上的愉悦”微不足道。但这是真的吗?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Older and Wiser? Knowing Animals Why Does It Have To Mean Anything? Life is Hard: How Philosophy Can Help Us Find Our Way The Forum: Radical Feminism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1