Is Internal Marketing a declining field? If so, why? A literature exploration from a hermeneutic perspective

N. Richardson, Ruth M Gosnay
{"title":"Is Internal Marketing a declining field? If so, why? A literature exploration from a hermeneutic perspective","authors":"N. Richardson, Ruth M Gosnay","doi":"10.1108/ccij-10-2022-0123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper reflects on antecedents that may cause academic fields to decline or stagnate. It uses a hermeneutic review to consolidate and critique the Internal Marketing (IM) field. Seminal studies of IM and its related construct Internal Marketing orientation (IMO) are identified. IMO is then juxtaposed with contemporary studies from a communications journal identified as core as part of the hermeneutic process.Design/methodology/approachThis study critiques the IMO literature in a hermeneutic review. It draws on the auto-ethnographic tradition to compare IMO with contemporary, related communications articles.FindingsTwo antecedents are addressed. There is interest in IM but less so in IMO. Aspects from the IMO literature align with two broad areas, namely customer-centric and company-centric communications. Some IMO aspects have been developed further therein.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper recognizes further research opportunities for IMO and communications scholars with a greater focus on boundary spanning employees in national, sectoral and organizational settings. Being conceptual means it lacks empirical testing; being hermeneutic means it contributes to methodological plurality.Practical implicationsDespite having potentially profound organizational effects, IMO lacks awareness and adoption. Recommendations are made throughout to facilitate the adoption of improved communications apropos improving IMO.Social implicationsThe paper identifies employee/employer benefits of adopting good internal communications (IC). IM(O) provides a rationale for sound IC practices.Originality/valueThis paper partially addresses the paucity of research into IMO including BSEs. It improves conceptualization by consolidating the key IMO research on the development and measurement of the construct, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses within the literature.","PeriodicalId":10696,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Communications: An International Journal","volume":"404 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Communications: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-10-2022-0123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper reflects on antecedents that may cause academic fields to decline or stagnate. It uses a hermeneutic review to consolidate and critique the Internal Marketing (IM) field. Seminal studies of IM and its related construct Internal Marketing orientation (IMO) are identified. IMO is then juxtaposed with contemporary studies from a communications journal identified as core as part of the hermeneutic process.Design/methodology/approachThis study critiques the IMO literature in a hermeneutic review. It draws on the auto-ethnographic tradition to compare IMO with contemporary, related communications articles.FindingsTwo antecedents are addressed. There is interest in IM but less so in IMO. Aspects from the IMO literature align with two broad areas, namely customer-centric and company-centric communications. Some IMO aspects have been developed further therein.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper recognizes further research opportunities for IMO and communications scholars with a greater focus on boundary spanning employees in national, sectoral and organizational settings. Being conceptual means it lacks empirical testing; being hermeneutic means it contributes to methodological plurality.Practical implicationsDespite having potentially profound organizational effects, IMO lacks awareness and adoption. Recommendations are made throughout to facilitate the adoption of improved communications apropos improving IMO.Social implicationsThe paper identifies employee/employer benefits of adopting good internal communications (IC). IM(O) provides a rationale for sound IC practices.Originality/valueThis paper partially addresses the paucity of research into IMO including BSEs. It improves conceptualization by consolidating the key IMO research on the development and measurement of the construct, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses within the literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内部营销是一个衰落的领域吗?如果是,为什么?解释学视角下的文学探索
目的反思可能导致学术领域衰落或停滞的前因。它使用解释学评论来巩固和批评内部营销(IM)领域。对内部营销导向及其相关结构进行了开创性的研究。然后将国际海事组织与一份通讯杂志的当代研究并置于一起,该杂志被确定为解释学过程的核心部分。设计/方法论/方法本研究对国际海事组织文献进行了解释学评论。它借鉴了汽车民族志的传统,将国际海事组织与当代相关的传播文章进行比较。两个先行词被处理。人们对IM感兴趣,但对IMO不那么感兴趣。国际海事组织文献的各个方面与两大领域一致,即以客户为中心和以公司为中心的沟通。其中还进一步发展了海事组织的一些方面。研究局限/影响本文认为国际海事组织和传播学者有进一步的研究机会,更多地关注国家、部门和组织环境中的跨界雇员。概念性意味着缺乏实证检验;解释性意味着它有助于方法论的多元性。尽管具有潜在的深远的组织影响,但IMO缺乏认识和采纳。在整个过程中提出了建议,以促进通过有关改进海事组织的改进通讯。社会意义本文确定了采用良好的内部沟通(IC)对员工/雇主的好处。IM(O)为良好的集成电路实践提供了基本原理。原创性/价值本文部分解决了包括疯牛病在内的IMO研究的缺乏。它通过巩固海事组织关于该结构的发展和衡量的关键研究,突出文献中的长处和弱点,改进概念化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Societal impact of Brand Public Relations on gender equality: evidence for a mediation-type mechanism Empowering public relations for sustainability: examining the landscape in Turkey Effectiveness of femvertising communications on social media: how brand promises and motive attributions impact brand equity and endorsement outcomes Silent ripples: negative CSR associations' impact in non-crisis situations Online faith-holder communities in crisis: proposing and testing a dual-challenge model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1