The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations

IF 0.2 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization Pub Date : 2021-08-31 DOI:10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no2.5
M. Ünal, F. Atakul
{"title":"The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations","authors":"M. Ünal, F. Atakul","doi":"10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different adhesive systems in amalgam restorations and their effects on microleakage. \nMethodology: In this study, 105 caries-free extracted human permanent molar teeth were used. Teeth were randomly assigned to five groups (n=21), and class I cavities were created on the surface of each tooth. The first was a control group to which no adhesive system was applied. Amalgam Liner (VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven Germany) was applied to Group II, Clearfil SE-Bond (Kuraray Europe GmbH, Frankfurt Germany) was applied to Group III, Panavia F 2.0 (Kuraray Europe GmbH, Frankfurt Germany) was applied to Group IV, Amalgambond Plus (Parkell Inc.Edgewood, NY USA) was applied to Group V, and then amalgam (Tytin, Kerr, California USA) restorations were placed. After the polishing process, samples were subjected to thermocycling 1,000 times. Teeth were sectioned bucco-palatinally/lingually, and microleakage scores of the occlusal walls were evaluated under a stereomicroscope at 15X magnification by a standardized scale ranging from 0 to 4. One tooth was selected randomly from each group for SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope), and SEM LEO EVO 40 (LEO Ltd., Cambridge UK) photographs of amalgam-tooth hard tissue interfaces were also taken at different magnifications. The results of the microleakage tests were statistically analyzed by both the Kruskal-Wallis Test and the Mann Whitney U Test. \nResults: In terms of microleakage among groups, the differences that were determined were significant (p<0.05). Microleakage within the control group was determined to be the highest, and statistically important differences were observed between the other groups. Group V (Amalgambond Plus) was determined to have the lowest microleakage scores. \nConclusion: In prepared class I cavities, amalgam adhesive systems are effective in preventing occlusal microleakage but do not completely blocked it. \n  \nHow to cite this article: Ünal M, Atakul F. The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations. Int Dent Res 2021;11(2):83-92. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no2.5 \n  \nLinguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.","PeriodicalId":31322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different adhesive systems in amalgam restorations and their effects on microleakage. Methodology: In this study, 105 caries-free extracted human permanent molar teeth were used. Teeth were randomly assigned to five groups (n=21), and class I cavities were created on the surface of each tooth. The first was a control group to which no adhesive system was applied. Amalgam Liner (VOCO GmbH, Cuxhaven Germany) was applied to Group II, Clearfil SE-Bond (Kuraray Europe GmbH, Frankfurt Germany) was applied to Group III, Panavia F 2.0 (Kuraray Europe GmbH, Frankfurt Germany) was applied to Group IV, Amalgambond Plus (Parkell Inc.Edgewood, NY USA) was applied to Group V, and then amalgam (Tytin, Kerr, California USA) restorations were placed. After the polishing process, samples were subjected to thermocycling 1,000 times. Teeth were sectioned bucco-palatinally/lingually, and microleakage scores of the occlusal walls were evaluated under a stereomicroscope at 15X magnification by a standardized scale ranging from 0 to 4. One tooth was selected randomly from each group for SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope), and SEM LEO EVO 40 (LEO Ltd., Cambridge UK) photographs of amalgam-tooth hard tissue interfaces were also taken at different magnifications. The results of the microleakage tests were statistically analyzed by both the Kruskal-Wallis Test and the Mann Whitney U Test. Results: In terms of microleakage among groups, the differences that were determined were significant (p<0.05). Microleakage within the control group was determined to be the highest, and statistically important differences were observed between the other groups. Group V (Amalgambond Plus) was determined to have the lowest microleakage scores. Conclusion: In prepared class I cavities, amalgam adhesive systems are effective in preventing occlusal microleakage but do not completely blocked it.   How to cite this article: Ünal M, Atakul F. The evaluation of effectiveness of adhesive systems on dental amalgam restorations. Int Dent Res 2021;11(2):83-92. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no2.5   Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙汞合金修复体粘接系统的有效性评价
目的:评价不同粘结体系在汞合金修复体中的效果及其对微渗漏的影响。方法:本研究选用无龋的人恒磨牙105颗。将牙齿随机分为5组(n=21),在每颗牙齿表面制造I类空腔。第一组是对照组,没有应用粘合剂系统。Amalgam Liner (VOCO GmbH,德国库克斯港)应用于第二组,Clearfil SE-Bond (Kuraray Europe GmbH,德国法兰克福)应用于第三组,Panavia F 2.0 (Kuraray Europe GmbH,德国法兰克福)应用于第四组,Amalgambond Plus (Parkell Inc.Edgewood, NY USA)应用于第五组,然后放置汞合金(Tytin, Kerr, California USA)修复体。抛光后,样品进行1000次热循环。在15倍放大的体视显微镜下,以0 ~ 4的标准分数线评估牙合壁微漏评分。每组随机选取1颗牙齿进行扫描电镜(SEM)扫描,并在不同的放大倍下拍摄银汞合金-牙齿硬组织界面的SEM LEO EVO 40 (LEO Ltd, Cambridge UK)照片。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Mann Whitney U检验对微泄漏试验结果进行统计分析。结果:各组间微渗漏测定差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。对照组微渗漏发生率最高,其他组间差异有统计学意义。V组(银汞合金+)的微渗漏评分最低。结论:在制备的I类牙槽中,银汞合金黏合剂系统能有效防止牙合微漏,但不能完全阻断牙合微漏。本文引用方式:Ünal M, Atakul F.牙汞合金修复体粘接系统的有效性评价。国际医学杂志,2021;11(2):83-92。https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2021.vol11.no2.5语言修改:本手稿中的英语已由至少两名专业编辑检查,他们都是英语母语者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the accuracy of intraoral scanners used in single-unit implant prosthesis construction Evaluation of the buccal bone thickness in the anterior maxillary region using cone-beam computed tomography Evaluation of the alveolar bone and lingual concavity in the posterior mandibular region based on cone-beam computed tomography data Evaluation of the effect of class II fixed orthodontic treatment on the periradicular bone structure of endodontically treated mandibular molar teeth using fractal dimension analysis Analyzing biomimetic dentistry YouTube videos' quality and content
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1