Randomly punctured Reed-Solomon codes achieve list-decoding capacity over linear-sized fields

Omar Alrabiah, V. Guruswami, Ray Li
{"title":"Randomly punctured Reed-Solomon codes achieve list-decoding capacity over linear-sized fields","authors":"Omar Alrabiah, V. Guruswami, Ray Li","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2304.09445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reed--Solomon codes are a classic family of error-correcting codes consisting of evaluations of low-degree polynomials over a finite field on some sequence of distinct field elements. They are widely known for their optimal unique-decoding capabilities, but their list-decoding capabilities are not fully understood. Given the prevalence of Reed-Solomon codes, a fundamental question in coding theory is determining if Reed--Solomon codes can optimally achieve list-decoding capacity. A recent breakthrough by Brakensiek, Gopi, and Makam, established that Reed--Solomon codes are combinatorially list-decodable all the way to capacity. However, their results hold for randomly-punctured Reed--Solomon codes over an exponentially large field size $2^{O(n)}$, where $n$ is the block length of the code. A natural question is whether Reed--Solomon codes can still achieve capacity over smaller fields. Recently, Guo and Zhang showed that Reed--Solomon codes are list-decodable to capacity with field size $O(n^2)$. We show that Reed--Solomon codes are list-decodable to capacity with linear field size $O(n)$, which is optimal up to the constant factor. We also give evidence that the ratio between the alphabet size $q$ and code length $n$ cannot be bounded by an absolute constant. Our techniques also show that random linear codes are list-decodable up to (the alphabet-independent) capacity with optimal list-size $O(1/\\varepsilon)$ and near-optimal alphabet size $2^{O(1/\\varepsilon^2)}$, where $\\varepsilon$ is the gap to capacity. As far as we are aware, list-decoding up to capacity with optimal list-size $O(1/\\varepsilon)$ was previously not known to be achievable with any linear code over a constant alphabet size (even non-constructively). Our proofs are based on the ideas of Guo and Zhang, and we additionally exploit symmetries of reduced intersection matrices.","PeriodicalId":11639,"journal":{"name":"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.09445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Reed--Solomon codes are a classic family of error-correcting codes consisting of evaluations of low-degree polynomials over a finite field on some sequence of distinct field elements. They are widely known for their optimal unique-decoding capabilities, but their list-decoding capabilities are not fully understood. Given the prevalence of Reed-Solomon codes, a fundamental question in coding theory is determining if Reed--Solomon codes can optimally achieve list-decoding capacity. A recent breakthrough by Brakensiek, Gopi, and Makam, established that Reed--Solomon codes are combinatorially list-decodable all the way to capacity. However, their results hold for randomly-punctured Reed--Solomon codes over an exponentially large field size $2^{O(n)}$, where $n$ is the block length of the code. A natural question is whether Reed--Solomon codes can still achieve capacity over smaller fields. Recently, Guo and Zhang showed that Reed--Solomon codes are list-decodable to capacity with field size $O(n^2)$. We show that Reed--Solomon codes are list-decodable to capacity with linear field size $O(n)$, which is optimal up to the constant factor. We also give evidence that the ratio between the alphabet size $q$ and code length $n$ cannot be bounded by an absolute constant. Our techniques also show that random linear codes are list-decodable up to (the alphabet-independent) capacity with optimal list-size $O(1/\varepsilon)$ and near-optimal alphabet size $2^{O(1/\varepsilon^2)}$, where $\varepsilon$ is the gap to capacity. As far as we are aware, list-decoding up to capacity with optimal list-size $O(1/\varepsilon)$ was previously not known to be achievable with any linear code over a constant alphabet size (even non-constructively). Our proofs are based on the ideas of Guo and Zhang, and we additionally exploit symmetries of reduced intersection matrices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机穿刺的里德-所罗门码在线性大小的字段上实现列表解码能力
Reed—Solomon码是一类典型的纠错码,由有限域上不同域元素序列上的低次多项式的求值组成。它们以其最佳的惟一解码能力而广为人知,但其列表解码能力尚未完全了解。考虑到里德-所罗门码的流行,编码理论中的一个基本问题是确定里德-所罗门码是否能最优地实现列表解码能力。Brakensiek、Gopi和Makam最近的一项突破,证实了Reed- Solomon密码是组合列表可解码的,一直到容量。然而,他们的结果适用于在一个指数级大的字段大小$2^{O(n)}$上随机穿孔的Reed- Solomon码,其中$n$是代码的块长度。一个自然的问题是,里德-所罗门码是否仍然可以在较小的油田上实现容量。最近,Guo和Zhang证明了Reed- Solomon码是列表可解码到域大小$O(n^2)$的容量。我们证明了Reed- Solomon码是列表可解码到具有线性字段大小$O(n)$的容量,这是最优的,直到常数因子。我们还证明了字母大小q和代码长度n之间的比值不能被一个绝对常数所限定。我们的技术还表明,随机线性代码具有列表可解码到(与字母无关的)容量,具有最优列表大小$O(1/\varepsilon)$和接近最优字母大小$2^{O(1/\varepsilon^2)}$,其中$\varepsilon$是容量的差距。据我们所知,列表解码到最优列表大小$O(1/\varepsilon)$的容量,在此之前,对于任何具有恒定字母表大小的线性代码(甚至是非建设性的)都是无法实现的。我们的证明是基于郭和张的思想,我们还利用了约简交矩阵的对称性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dependency schemes in CDCL-based QBF solving: a proof-theoretic study On blocky ranks of matrices Fractional Linear Matroid Matching is in quasi-NC Aaronson-Ambainis Conjecture Is True For Random Restrictions Optimal Pseudorandom Generators for Low-Degree Polynomials Over Moderately Large Fields
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1