Empowerment, Emancipation and Engaged Engineering

J. Kleba, C. Cruz
{"title":"Empowerment, Emancipation and Engaged Engineering","authors":"J. Kleba, C. Cruz","doi":"10.24908/ijesjp.v8i2.14380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The field of engaged engineering encompasses a wide diversity of intervention approaches and ideals that span from Enactus’ social entrepreneurship to grassroots engineering’s liberating co-construction of other possible sociotechnical orders. In common, these initiatives intend to be empowering, even though this concept is hardly thematized in their publications and has never undergone a more systematic analysis. In this paper, departing from an illustration of that lack of reflection (or rigor) concerning empowerment, a general definition for it is first provided to, subsequently, be specified in seven different dimensions related to the assisted community’s empowerment that can be addressed via sociotechnical interventions, from social inclusion to political emancipation. Thus, it analyzes the relationship between empowerment and emancipation, including the risk of disempowering. Next, an analysis of the interventions practiced by Brazilian Enactus’ leading teams and some grassroots engineering initiatives illustrates the provided conceptual framework. The paper concludes by highlighting key issues of empowerment and its relation to emancipation, and addressing some further research themes related to this investigation: refining the presented dimensions of community empowerment, and analyzing empowerment  to the broader context of a sociotechnical intervention (e.g., academia, the the state, civil society and economic actors).","PeriodicalId":29704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Engineering Social Justice and Peace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/ijesjp.v8i2.14380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The field of engaged engineering encompasses a wide diversity of intervention approaches and ideals that span from Enactus’ social entrepreneurship to grassroots engineering’s liberating co-construction of other possible sociotechnical orders. In common, these initiatives intend to be empowering, even though this concept is hardly thematized in their publications and has never undergone a more systematic analysis. In this paper, departing from an illustration of that lack of reflection (or rigor) concerning empowerment, a general definition for it is first provided to, subsequently, be specified in seven different dimensions related to the assisted community’s empowerment that can be addressed via sociotechnical interventions, from social inclusion to political emancipation. Thus, it analyzes the relationship between empowerment and emancipation, including the risk of disempowering. Next, an analysis of the interventions practiced by Brazilian Enactus’ leading teams and some grassroots engineering initiatives illustrates the provided conceptual framework. The paper concludes by highlighting key issues of empowerment and its relation to emancipation, and addressing some further research themes related to this investigation: refining the presented dimensions of community empowerment, and analyzing empowerment  to the broader context of a sociotechnical intervention (e.g., academia, the the state, civil society and economic actors).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
授权,解放和参与工程
参与工程领域涵盖了广泛的干预方法和理想,从Enactus的社会企业家精神到基层工程对其他可能的社会技术秩序的解放性共同构建。总的来说,这些倡议的目的是赋予权力,尽管这一概念在它们的出版物中几乎没有成为主题,也从来没有经过更系统的分析。在本文中,从缺乏对赋权的反思(或严格性)的例证出发,首先提供了一个关于赋权的一般定义,随后,在与被援助社区赋权相关的七个不同维度中进行了具体说明,这些维度可以通过社会技术干预来解决,从社会包容到政治解放。因此,它分析了赋权和解放之间的关系,包括剥夺权力的风险。接下来,对巴西Enactus领导团队实施的干预措施和一些基层工程计划的分析说明了所提供的概念框架。本文最后强调了赋权的关键问题及其与解放的关系,并解决了与本调查相关的一些进一步的研究主题:细化社区赋权的维度,并在社会技术干预(例如,学术界,国家,公民社会和经济行动者)的更广泛背景下分析赋权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Actioning social justice into the engineering curriculum Autonomía y comunidad: horizonte político de la apropiación tecnológica Autonomía tecnológica: la experiencia de Tosepan Limakxtum en la Sierra Norte de Puebla Diálogos Construcción colectiva de sensores de bajo costo como herramienta para el monitoreo de la calidad del aire y el cuidado de la vida en Puente Aranda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1