Antecedents of Social Media Advertising Avoidance: An Empirical Study in Pawnbroking Industry

Van Tuan Pham, Thinh Hoang, Tien Dat Du, VanNguyen Do
{"title":"Antecedents of Social Media Advertising Avoidance: An Empirical Study in Pawnbroking Industry","authors":"Van Tuan Pham, Thinh Hoang, Tien Dat Du, VanNguyen Do","doi":"10.47059/alinteri/v36i1/ajas21103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - This paper aims to explore antecedents of ad avoidance with the context in the Vietnam pawnbroking industry. Furthermore, the differences in ad avoidance under personal characteristics will firstly appear in this study. Methodology - A qualitative method from 412 social media users was used to test the proposed model. All data were assessed reliability and validity on SPSS version 26 before conducting into CFA and CB-SEM in AMOS software. Findings - The findings indicate that while ad skepticism and perceptions ad as controversial partially mediates the relationship between ad avoidance and its three determinants (Advertising invasiveness, Perceived Value value and Expectation of Negative), perceived space invasiveness has the most potent effect on pawn ad avoidance. Skeptical customers are more likely to avoid pawnbroking advertisements than those who perceive such ads as controversial. The results also show that ethical judgement moderates both the relationship of perceived controversial ads and ad avoidance and the relationship between ad skepticism and ad avoidance. Implications - Social media platform owners were suggested to reinforce their censoring system and advertising placements. Marketers in this study were convinced to generate advertisements with emotional and informative appeals. Besides, appropriate marketing activities, channels, and ad formats with campaigns should be considered strictly. Originality/value - The mediating role of attitude in the relationship between perception and ad avoidance has been firstly affirmed by qualitative data in this study. Interestingly, researchers explored a new variable - Negative eWOM with a medium impact of ad skepticism. Ethical judgement was demonstrated as a drastically important factor in pawnbroking research.","PeriodicalId":42396,"journal":{"name":"Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47059/alinteri/v36i1/ajas21103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose - This paper aims to explore antecedents of ad avoidance with the context in the Vietnam pawnbroking industry. Furthermore, the differences in ad avoidance under personal characteristics will firstly appear in this study. Methodology - A qualitative method from 412 social media users was used to test the proposed model. All data were assessed reliability and validity on SPSS version 26 before conducting into CFA and CB-SEM in AMOS software. Findings - The findings indicate that while ad skepticism and perceptions ad as controversial partially mediates the relationship between ad avoidance and its three determinants (Advertising invasiveness, Perceived Value value and Expectation of Negative), perceived space invasiveness has the most potent effect on pawn ad avoidance. Skeptical customers are more likely to avoid pawnbroking advertisements than those who perceive such ads as controversial. The results also show that ethical judgement moderates both the relationship of perceived controversial ads and ad avoidance and the relationship between ad skepticism and ad avoidance. Implications - Social media platform owners were suggested to reinforce their censoring system and advertising placements. Marketers in this study were convinced to generate advertisements with emotional and informative appeals. Besides, appropriate marketing activities, channels, and ad formats with campaigns should be considered strictly. Originality/value - The mediating role of attitude in the relationship between perception and ad avoidance has been firstly affirmed by qualitative data in this study. Interestingly, researchers explored a new variable - Negative eWOM with a medium impact of ad skepticism. Ethical judgement was demonstrated as a drastically important factor in pawnbroking research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体广告回避的前因:典当业的实证研究
目的-本文旨在探讨在越南典当行业背景下的广告回避的前因。此外,个人特征下的广告回避差异将首先出现在本研究中。方法-使用来自412名社交媒体用户的定性方法来测试所提出的模型。所有数据在SPSS version 26中进行信度和效度评估,然后在AMOS软件中进行CFA和CB-SEM分析。研究结果-研究结果表明,虽然广告怀疑和认知广告争议在一定程度上调解了广告回避与其三个决定因素(广告侵入性、感知价值价值和负面预期)之间的关系,但感知空间侵入性对pawn广告回避的影响最大。持怀疑态度的顾客比那些认为典当广告有争议的顾客更有可能避开典当广告。结果还表明,道德判断调节了感知争议性广告与广告回避的关系,以及广告怀疑与广告回避的关系。建议社交媒体平台所有者加强审查系统和广告投放。在这项研究中,营销人员被说服制作具有情感和信息吸引力的广告。此外,适当的营销活动、渠道和广告形式应该严格考虑。原创性/价值——本研究首次通过定性数据证实了态度在感知与广告回避关系中的中介作用。有趣的是,研究人员探索了一个新的变量-负edom与广告怀疑的中等影响。在典当业研究中,伦理判断是一个非常重要的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences
Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Senna Leaves Extract and Rosuvastatin on Blood Parameters of Inducing Hyperlipidemia Laboratory Rats The Response of Growth and Yield of Sweet Pepper (Capsicum Annuum) to the Spraying with Nano-amino Acids and Potassium Silicate Effect of Organic Fertilization with Humic Acid and Foliar Spraying with Bread Yeast Extract on the Growth and Yield of the Solanum Melongena L The Effect of different Types of Organic Fertilizers on the Growth and Yield of Vegetable Plants Risk Management and Operational Performance of Hospitality Enterprises – A Case Study in the North Central Region of Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1