Systematic assessment of damage to buildings due to groundwater lowering-induced subsidence: methodology for large scale application in the Netherlands
{"title":"Systematic assessment of damage to buildings due to groundwater lowering-induced subsidence: methodology for large scale application in the Netherlands","authors":"Ana L. Costa, S. Kok, M. Korff","doi":"10.5194/piahs-382-577-2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. In the Netherlands, subsidence of peat and clay soils due\nto (artificial) lowering of the groundwater table and loading of soft soils\nis commonplace, causing extensive damage to exposed and vulnerable assets.\nAwareness of subsidence-related damage to buildings has recently increased\nin the Netherlands, particularly after reported damages due to the 2018\nextremely long dry period. However, despite this being a major concern to\nhomeowners and public authorities, an integrated and systematic risk\nassessment on regional or national scale is currently lacking which inhibits\nconcrete and meaningful action. In this paper, we propose a methodology for\nthe systematic regional or countrywide assessment of two subsidence-related\ndamage mechanisms to buildings: differential settlement of buildings on\nshallow foundation, and timber pile degradation due to low groundwater\nlevels. The methodology is set up in a modular, systematic way – initially\nbased on expert judgement and validation with available local detailed\ninformation and allows for future improvements. Progress in individual\ncontributing factors to damages can be seamlessly integrated for the\nsystematic improvement of damage estimates. This approach can be replicated\nfor other damage mechanisms and detailed to provide a more local risk\nassessment. We expect results to be a valuable input for public or private\ndecision making, e.g. in awareness raising and evaluating interventions.\n","PeriodicalId":53381,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-382-577-2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Abstract. In the Netherlands, subsidence of peat and clay soils due
to (artificial) lowering of the groundwater table and loading of soft soils
is commonplace, causing extensive damage to exposed and vulnerable assets.
Awareness of subsidence-related damage to buildings has recently increased
in the Netherlands, particularly after reported damages due to the 2018
extremely long dry period. However, despite this being a major concern to
homeowners and public authorities, an integrated and systematic risk
assessment on regional or national scale is currently lacking which inhibits
concrete and meaningful action. In this paper, we propose a methodology for
the systematic regional or countrywide assessment of two subsidence-related
damage mechanisms to buildings: differential settlement of buildings on
shallow foundation, and timber pile degradation due to low groundwater
levels. The methodology is set up in a modular, systematic way – initially
based on expert judgement and validation with available local detailed
information and allows for future improvements. Progress in individual
contributing factors to damages can be seamlessly integrated for the
systematic improvement of damage estimates. This approach can be replicated
for other damage mechanisms and detailed to provide a more local risk
assessment. We expect results to be a valuable input for public or private
decision making, e.g. in awareness raising and evaluating interventions.