Investigation of the Timing of Drug Intake Described in Package Inserts and Their Assessment with Respect to Rational Usage of Medicine

E. Negishi, Y. Nakajima, R. Endoh, Yasuhiko Yamada, Hitoshi Nakamura, Hitoshi Sato, T. Iga
{"title":"Investigation of the Timing of Drug Intake Described in Package Inserts and Their Assessment with Respect to Rational Usage of Medicine","authors":"E. Negishi, Y. Nakajima, R. Endoh, Yasuhiko Yamada, Hitoshi Nakamura, Hitoshi Sato, T. Iga","doi":"10.5649/JJPHCS1975.26.202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An investigation of package inserts was performed for 794 oral prescription drugs, in order to assess the package inserts as an information resource regarding the timing of drug intake which is important for rational usage of medicine. As a result, the number of package inserts which described the proper timing of drug intake was only 157 (20%). The timings of drug intake could be classified into five categories, i.e., before a meal, immediately before a meal, immediately after a meal, after a meal and between meals (at a hunger state). Evidence for the timing of drug intake is written in only 9% of the package inserts. However, such evidence could be provided from interview forms and original articles for 24% and 44% of the drugs, respectively. Furthermore, most of the evidence for the timing of drug intake (94%) was shown to be meant for either the appropriate onset of therapeutic actions (58%) or the prevention of adverse reactions (36%). On the other hand, there was a clear tendency that more evidence is provided for drugs which were put on market more recently. From these results, the information only from package inserts was found to be insufficient for the rational usage of medicine and that the timing of drug intake should thus be explained to patients based on additional investigation from interview forms and original articles as described in this study in order to achieve an improved efficacy and safety of drug administration.","PeriodicalId":17399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Nippon Hospital Pharmacists Association","volume":"124 1","pages":"202-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Nippon Hospital Pharmacists Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5649/JJPHCS1975.26.202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An investigation of package inserts was performed for 794 oral prescription drugs, in order to assess the package inserts as an information resource regarding the timing of drug intake which is important for rational usage of medicine. As a result, the number of package inserts which described the proper timing of drug intake was only 157 (20%). The timings of drug intake could be classified into five categories, i.e., before a meal, immediately before a meal, immediately after a meal, after a meal and between meals (at a hunger state). Evidence for the timing of drug intake is written in only 9% of the package inserts. However, such evidence could be provided from interview forms and original articles for 24% and 44% of the drugs, respectively. Furthermore, most of the evidence for the timing of drug intake (94%) was shown to be meant for either the appropriate onset of therapeutic actions (58%) or the prevention of adverse reactions (36%). On the other hand, there was a clear tendency that more evidence is provided for drugs which were put on market more recently. From these results, the information only from package inserts was found to be insufficient for the rational usage of medicine and that the timing of drug intake should thus be explained to patients based on additional investigation from interview forms and original articles as described in this study in order to achieve an improved efficacy and safety of drug administration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药品说明书用药时间的调查及合理用药评价
对794种口服处方药的说明书进行调查,以评估说明书作为药物摄入时间的信息资源对合理用药的重要性。结果,描述药物摄入适当时间的说明书数量仅为157(20%)。服药时间可分为餐前、餐前、餐后、餐后和餐间(饥饿状态)五类。只有9%的药品说明书上写有药物摄入时间的证据。然而,24%的药物可以从访谈表格和原始文章中获得证据,44%的药物可以从原始文章中获得证据。此外,大多数关于药物摄入时间(94%)的证据表明,要么是适当开始治疗行动(58%),要么是预防不良反应(36%)。另一方面,有一个明显的趋势是,越来越多的证据表明,最近上市的药物是有效的。从这些结果来看,仅从药品说明书上获取的信息不足以帮助患者合理用药,因此,应根据本研究所述的对访谈表格和原始文章的进一步调查,向患者解释服药时间,以提高给药的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of Urate-Lowering Drugs Using a Prescription Database 球形吸着炭 (クレメジン原体) の胆汁酸吸着性 癌化学療法時の口内炎に対するプロスタンディン®軟膏・アルロイドG液混合製剤の有効性 Collaboration of Hospital Pharmacists with Pharmaceutical College on Evaluation of Generic Drugs : The Case of Dissolution Test of Sodium Loxoprofen Tablets A Case Report and Evaluation of Pirmenol Toxicity Appeared with Liver Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1