Can clinical parameters at admission predict severity and intensive care unit mortality outcomes in patients with COVID-19?

KFibi Ninan, R. Iyadurai, Justin K Varghese, JJonathan Arul Jeevan, Karthik Gunasekaran, R. Karuppusami, B. Chacko, K. Johnson, Amit Mandal, NivinStanley David
{"title":"Can clinical parameters at admission predict severity and intensive care unit mortality outcomes in patients with COVID-19?","authors":"KFibi Ninan, R. Iyadurai, Justin K Varghese, JJonathan Arul Jeevan, Karthik Gunasekaran, R. Karuppusami, B. Chacko, K. Johnson, Amit Mandal, NivinStanley David","doi":"10.4103/cmi.cmi_6_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Identification of clinical prognostic factors at admission is crucial in the triage and therapeutic selection of patients in resource-poor settings. The study was done to identify clinical parameters at admission to prognosticate patients who required intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Methods: In this retrospective study, the clinical parameters and outcomes of critically ill patients admitted from a single medical unit during the second wave of COVID-19 were studied. Patients were categorized as survivors and nonsurvivors. Factors associated with mortality were explored using Fisher's exact and t-test as appropriate. Results: The study population included 62 patients with a male: female ratio of 43 (69.3%):19 (30.7%) with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 50.97 (±9.9) years. The mean (SD) O2 saturation was 82% (±10%) and median (interquartile range) PaO2/FiO2 ratio was 161 (89–214) on arrival to the emergency department. Forty-two (66%) required mechanical ventilation and the mean (SD) duration of hospital stay was 20 (±15) days. Thirty-six patients died, and the overall mortality was 58.1%. Increasing age, low SpO2 at presentation to the hospital, and need for mechanical ventilation were noted to be independent predictors of mortality with an odds ratio of 5.1 (95% confidence interval) (1.61–16.2) (P = 0.006) and 25 (3.70–180.19) (P = 0.001), respectively. Admission respiratory rate >36/min (P = 0.009) and SpO2 ≤83% (P = 0.001) were predictive of increased mortality among ICU patients. Conclusion: Low SpO2 at presentation (<83%), high respiratory rate (>36/min), and requirement of mechanical ventilation were strong predictors of mortality in patients admitted to ICU with COVID-19 ARDS.","PeriodicalId":72734,"journal":{"name":"Current medical issues","volume":"14 1","pages":"168 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current medical issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/cmi.cmi_6_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Identification of clinical prognostic factors at admission is crucial in the triage and therapeutic selection of patients in resource-poor settings. The study was done to identify clinical parameters at admission to prognosticate patients who required intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Methods: In this retrospective study, the clinical parameters and outcomes of critically ill patients admitted from a single medical unit during the second wave of COVID-19 were studied. Patients were categorized as survivors and nonsurvivors. Factors associated with mortality were explored using Fisher's exact and t-test as appropriate. Results: The study population included 62 patients with a male: female ratio of 43 (69.3%):19 (30.7%) with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 50.97 (±9.9) years. The mean (SD) O2 saturation was 82% (±10%) and median (interquartile range) PaO2/FiO2 ratio was 161 (89–214) on arrival to the emergency department. Forty-two (66%) required mechanical ventilation and the mean (SD) duration of hospital stay was 20 (±15) days. Thirty-six patients died, and the overall mortality was 58.1%. Increasing age, low SpO2 at presentation to the hospital, and need for mechanical ventilation were noted to be independent predictors of mortality with an odds ratio of 5.1 (95% confidence interval) (1.61–16.2) (P = 0.006) and 25 (3.70–180.19) (P = 0.001), respectively. Admission respiratory rate >36/min (P = 0.009) and SpO2 ≤83% (P = 0.001) were predictive of increased mortality among ICU patients. Conclusion: Low SpO2 at presentation (<83%), high respiratory rate (>36/min), and requirement of mechanical ventilation were strong predictors of mortality in patients admitted to ICU with COVID-19 ARDS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
入院时的临床参数能否预测COVID-19患者的严重程度和重症监护病房死亡率结局?
背景:COVID-19急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)具有较高的发病率和死亡率。在资源贫乏的情况下,入院时确定临床预后因素对患者的分诊和治疗选择至关重要。该研究的目的是确定入院时的临床参数,以预测需要重症监护病房(ICU)入院的患者。方法:回顾性分析第二波新冠肺炎疫情期间同一医疗单位收治的危重患者的临床参数和转归。患者分为幸存者和非幸存者。采用Fisher精确检验和t检验探讨与死亡率相关的因素。结果:纳入研究人群62例,男女比例为43(69.3%):19(30.7%),平均(标准差[SD])年龄为50.97(±9.9)岁。到达急诊科时,平均(SD) O2饱和度为82%(±10%),中位数(四分位间距)PaO2/FiO2比值为161(89-214)。42例(66%)需要机械通气,平均(SD)住院时间为20(±15)天。死亡36例,总死亡率为58.1%。年龄增加、入院时SpO2低和需要机械通气是死亡率的独立预测因素,比值比分别为5.1(95%可信区间)(1.61-16.2)(P = 0.006)和25 (3.70-180.19)(P = 0.001)。入院呼吸率>36/min (P = 0.009)和SpO2≤83% (P = 0.001)可预测ICU患者死亡率升高。结论:入院时低SpO2 (36/min)和机械通气需求是ICU收治的COVID-19 ARDS患者死亡率的重要预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Should Medicine be Taught in Leading Medical Languages or the Mother Tongue? Utility of Sensate Pedicled Medial Thigh Perforator Flaps in Treating Recurrent Ischial Ulcers in Individuals with Cauda Equina Lesions and Spinal Dysraphism – A Retrospective Analysis Compound Odontome Causing Agenesis of Mandibular Canine Diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis Beyond Childhood in India Rhythm Generating Mechanisms in Rat Sinoatrial Node
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1