Efficacy of Auditory Spatial Training with Real-Life Environmental Noise on Speech-in-Noise Intelligibility of Children with Hearing Loss

Q3 Medicine Audiology and Speech Research Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI:10.21848/asr.230108
Eunah Choi, J. Lee
{"title":"Efficacy of Auditory Spatial Training with Real-Life Environmental Noise on Speech-in-Noise Intelligibility of Children with Hearing Loss","authors":"Eunah Choi, J. Lee","doi":"10.21848/asr.230108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether auditory spatial training with real-life environmental noise would improve the speech-in-noise intelligibility of hearing-impaired children. Methods: Thirteen children with hearing loss participated in this study. We conducted an 8-week in-laboratory auditory spatial training. During the training, the target sentence and pre-recorded real-life environmental noise were spatially separated by 90°, and uncertainty about the location of the target and noise was given. To evaluate the efficacy of the training, sentence recognition with fluctuating and non-fluctuating noises was measured in a free sound-field condition, where the speech and noise sources were spatially separated and also co-located. The pre-training tests of sentence-in-noise recognition were performed twice with an interval of 6 weeks. The sentence-in-noise recognition test was also measured right after the 8-week training (post-training test) as well as 1 month after the completion of the training (retention test). In addition to the objective tests, the parents completed a subjective questionnaire on auditory behavior in everyday life before and after training. Results: There were no significant differences between the results of the two pre-training tests. The auditory spatial training significantly enhanced sentence-in-noise recognition in both spatially separated and co-located conditions at all signal-to-noise ratios, and the training efficacy was maintained until 1 month after the completion of the training. The parental subjective responses also showed positive changes after the training. Conclusion: An 8-week auditory spatial training could effectively enhance the speech-in-noise intelligibility of hearing-impaired children in spatialized as well as non-spatialized conditions.","PeriodicalId":36841,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Speech Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Speech Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21848/asr.230108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether auditory spatial training with real-life environmental noise would improve the speech-in-noise intelligibility of hearing-impaired children. Methods: Thirteen children with hearing loss participated in this study. We conducted an 8-week in-laboratory auditory spatial training. During the training, the target sentence and pre-recorded real-life environmental noise were spatially separated by 90°, and uncertainty about the location of the target and noise was given. To evaluate the efficacy of the training, sentence recognition with fluctuating and non-fluctuating noises was measured in a free sound-field condition, where the speech and noise sources were spatially separated and also co-located. The pre-training tests of sentence-in-noise recognition were performed twice with an interval of 6 weeks. The sentence-in-noise recognition test was also measured right after the 8-week training (post-training test) as well as 1 month after the completion of the training (retention test). In addition to the objective tests, the parents completed a subjective questionnaire on auditory behavior in everyday life before and after training. Results: There were no significant differences between the results of the two pre-training tests. The auditory spatial training significantly enhanced sentence-in-noise recognition in both spatially separated and co-located conditions at all signal-to-noise ratios, and the training efficacy was maintained until 1 month after the completion of the training. The parental subjective responses also showed positive changes after the training. Conclusion: An 8-week auditory spatial training could effectively enhance the speech-in-noise intelligibility of hearing-impaired children in spatialized as well as non-spatialized conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真实环境噪声听觉空间训练对听力损失儿童噪音中言语清晰度的影响
目的:本研究旨在探讨真实环境噪声下的听觉空间训练是否能提高听障儿童在噪声中言语的可理解性。方法:13例听力损失儿童参与本研究。我们进行了为期8周的实验室听觉空间训练。在训练过程中,目标句子和预先录制的真实环境噪声在空间上间隔90°,并给出目标句子和噪声位置的不确定性。为了评估训练的效果,在自由声场条件下测量了波动和非波动噪声下的句子识别,其中语音和噪声源在空间上是分开的,并且也位于同一位置。以6周为间隔,进行2次噪声中句子识别的预训练测试。在训练结束8周后(训练后测试)和训练结束1个月后(记忆测试)测量噪声中句子识别测试。在客观测试的基础上,家长还对训练前后日常生活中的听觉行为进行了主观问卷调查。结果:两组训练前测试结果无显著性差异。在所有信噪比下,听觉空间训练均显著增强了空间分离和同地条件下的噪声句子识别,且训练效果持续到训练结束后1个月。父母的主观反应在训练后也出现了积极的变化。结论:为期8周的听觉空间训练可有效提高空间化和非空间化条件下听障儿童的噪声语音可理解性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology and Speech Research
Audiology and Speech Research Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Research on Effective Methodology for Hearing Impairment Rehabilitation; Based on a Diary Study for Elderly OnlineAuditory Training Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties and Hearing Aid Uptake Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire in Cochlear Implant Users Research Trends According to the Speech Production Mechanism of Patients with Dysarthria Caused by Acute Brain Injury in Korea The Necessity for Auditory Training with Idiomatic Expressions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1