Learning-oriented Language Test Preparation Materials: A contradiction in terms? 

IF 0.1 Q4 LINGUISTICS Studies in Language Assessment Pub Date : 2017-11-10 DOI:10.58379/sfun3846
A. Green
{"title":"Learning-oriented Language Test Preparation Materials: A contradiction in terms? ","authors":"A. Green","doi":"10.58379/sfun3846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impact of the use of assessment on teaching and learning is increasingly regarded as a key concern in evaluating assessment use. Realising intended forms of impact relies on more than the design of an assessment: account must also be taken of the ways in which teachers, learners and others understand the demands of the assessment and incorporate these into their practice. The measures that testing agencies take to present and explicate their tests to teachers and other stakeholders therefore play an important role in promoting intended impact and mitigating unintended, negative impact. Materials that support teachers in preparing learners to take tests (such as descriptions of the test, preparation materials and teacher training resources) play an important role in communicating the test providers’ intentions. In this study, these support materials are analysed. The selected materials, provided to teachers by Cambridge English Language Assessment, go with the Speaking component of a major international test of general English proficiency: Cambridge English: First. The study addresses how these materials might embody or reflect learning-oriented assessment principles of task authenticity, learner engagement and feedback within a coherent systemic theory of action, reconciling formative and summative assessment functions to the benefit of learning.","PeriodicalId":29650,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language Assessment","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58379/sfun3846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The impact of the use of assessment on teaching and learning is increasingly regarded as a key concern in evaluating assessment use. Realising intended forms of impact relies on more than the design of an assessment: account must also be taken of the ways in which teachers, learners and others understand the demands of the assessment and incorporate these into their practice. The measures that testing agencies take to present and explicate their tests to teachers and other stakeholders therefore play an important role in promoting intended impact and mitigating unintended, negative impact. Materials that support teachers in preparing learners to take tests (such as descriptions of the test, preparation materials and teacher training resources) play an important role in communicating the test providers’ intentions. In this study, these support materials are analysed. The selected materials, provided to teachers by Cambridge English Language Assessment, go with the Speaking component of a major international test of general English proficiency: Cambridge English: First. The study addresses how these materials might embody or reflect learning-oriented assessment principles of task authenticity, learner engagement and feedback within a coherent systemic theory of action, reconciling formative and summative assessment functions to the benefit of learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习型语言备考材料:术语上的矛盾?
评估的使用对教与学的影响越来越被视为评估评估使用的一个关键问题。实现预期形式的影响不仅取决于评估的设计:还必须考虑教师、学习者和其他人理解评估要求并将其纳入实践的方式。因此,考试机构为向教师和其他利益攸关方介绍和说明其考试而采取的措施在促进预期影响和减轻意外的负面影响方面发挥了重要作用。支持教师帮助学习者备考的材料(如考试说明、备考材料和教师培训资源)在传达考试提供者的意图方面发挥着重要作用。本研究对这些支撑材料进行了分析。这些精选材料由剑桥英语语言评估中心提供给教师,与主要国际通用英语水平测试的口语部分相匹配:剑桥英语:第一。本研究探讨了这些材料如何体现或反映任务真实性、学习者参与和反馈等以学习为导向的评估原则,并在连贯的系统行动理论中协调形成性和总结性评估功能,以促进学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contextual variables in written assessment feedback in a university-level Spanish program The effect of in-class and one-on-one video feedback on EFL learners’ English public speaking competency and anxiety Gebril, A. (Ed.) Learning-Oriented Language Assessment: Putting Theory into Practice. Is the devil you know better? Testwiseness and eliciting evidence of interactional competence in familiar versus unfamiliar triadic speaking tasks The meaningfulness of two curriculum-based national tests of English as a foreign language
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1