The development of aerobic capacity: a comparison of continuous and interval training.

L. W. Gregory
{"title":"The development of aerobic capacity: a comparison of continuous and interval training.","authors":"L. W. Gregory","doi":"10.1080/10671315.1979.10615601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Untrained college males were randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups or a control group. There were five, seven, and nine subjects in the control, interval, and continuous groups, respectively. Training consisted of jogging or running on a quarter-mile track for a distance of 2 miles, 5 days a week for 6 weeks. The continuous group trained at an intensity of 162 beats per minute (bpm), while the interval group trained at 174 bpm. A minimum of three 4-minute work intervals and a work/rest ratio of 1:1 were utilized by the interval group. Significant (p < .01) within-group (pre- versus posttraining) differences were found in the experimental groups for oxygen uptake (ml/kg·minute) at 180 bpm and Balke treadmill performance. Analysis of covariance demonstrated significant (p < .05) differences in aerobic capacity and treadmill performance among groups. Post hoc comparisons revealed significant (p < .05) differences between the control group and each experimental group. No significant dif...","PeriodicalId":76424,"journal":{"name":"Research quarterly","volume":"39 1","pages":"199-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10671315.1979.10615601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Abstract Untrained college males were randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups or a control group. There were five, seven, and nine subjects in the control, interval, and continuous groups, respectively. Training consisted of jogging or running on a quarter-mile track for a distance of 2 miles, 5 days a week for 6 weeks. The continuous group trained at an intensity of 162 beats per minute (bpm), while the interval group trained at 174 bpm. A minimum of three 4-minute work intervals and a work/rest ratio of 1:1 were utilized by the interval group. Significant (p < .01) within-group (pre- versus posttraining) differences were found in the experimental groups for oxygen uptake (ml/kg·minute) at 180 bpm and Balke treadmill performance. Analysis of covariance demonstrated significant (p < .05) differences in aerobic capacity and treadmill performance among groups. Post hoc comparisons revealed significant (p < .05) differences between the control group and each experimental group. No significant dif...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有氧能力的发展:连续训练和间歇训练的比较。
未经训练的大学男生被随机分为两个实验组或对照组。对照组、间歇组和连续组分别有5名、7名和9名受试者。训练包括慢跑或在1 / 4英里的跑道上跑2英里,每周5天,持续6周。连续组以每分钟162拍的强度训练,而间歇组以每分钟174拍的强度训练。间隔组使用至少3次4分钟的工作间隔和1:1的工作/休息比。实验组180 bpm摄氧量(ml/kg·min)和Balke跑步机性能组内(训练前后)差异显著(p < 0.01)。协方差分析显示,组间有氧能力和跑步机性能差异显著(p < 0.05)。事后比较显示对照组和实验组之间有显著差异(p < 0.05)。没有显著差异……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Action research and development: utilizing sociometric analysis in physical education and athletic departments. Strategies for the analysis of repeated and multiple measures designs. Effect of age, sex, and type of feedback on motor performance and locus of control. Effects of goal setting on achievement in archery. Effects of teaching experience, knowledge of performer competence, and knowledge of performance outcome on performance error identification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1