A Security Model and Fully Verified Implementation for the IETF QUIC Record Layer

Antoine Delignat-Lavaud, C. Fournet, Bryan Parno, Jonathan Protzenko, T. Ramananandro, Jay Bosamiya, Joseph Lallemand, Itsaka Rakotonirina, Yi Zhou
{"title":"A Security Model and Fully Verified Implementation for the IETF QUIC Record Layer","authors":"Antoine Delignat-Lavaud, C. Fournet, Bryan Parno, Jonathan Protzenko, T. Ramananandro, Jay Bosamiya, Joseph Lallemand, Itsaka Rakotonirina, Yi Zhou","doi":"10.1109/SP40001.2021.00039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on earlier protocol-verification work, we investigate the security of the QUIC record layer, as standardized by the IETF in draft version 30. This version features major differences compared to Google’s original protocol and early IETF drafts. It serves as a useful test case for our verification methodology and toolchain, while also, hopefully, drawing attention to a little studied yet crucially important emerging standard.We model QUIC packet and header encryption, which uses a custom construction for privacy. To capture its goals, we propose a security definition for authenticated encryption with semi-implicit nonces. We show that QUIC uses an instance of a generic construction parameterized by a standard AEAD-secure scheme and a PRF-secure cipher. We formalize and verify the security of this construction in F. The proof uncovers interesting limitations of nonce confidentiality, due to the malleability of short headers and the ability to choose the number of least significant bits included in the packet counter. We propose improvements that simplify the proof and increase robustness against strong attacker models. In addition to the verified security model, we also give a concrete functional specification for the record layer, and prove that it satisfies important functionality properties (such as the correct successful decryption of encrypted packets) after fixing more errors in the draft. We then provide a high-performance implementation of the record layer that we prove to be memory safe, correct with respect to our concrete specification (inheriting its functional correctness properties), and secure with respect to our verified model. To evaluate this component, we develop a provably-safe implementation of the rest of the QUIC protocol. Our record layer achieves nearly 2 GB/s throughput, and our QUIC implementation’s performance is within 21% of an unverified baseline.","PeriodicalId":6786,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","volume":"1 1","pages":"1162-1178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SP40001.2021.00039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Drawing on earlier protocol-verification work, we investigate the security of the QUIC record layer, as standardized by the IETF in draft version 30. This version features major differences compared to Google’s original protocol and early IETF drafts. It serves as a useful test case for our verification methodology and toolchain, while also, hopefully, drawing attention to a little studied yet crucially important emerging standard.We model QUIC packet and header encryption, which uses a custom construction for privacy. To capture its goals, we propose a security definition for authenticated encryption with semi-implicit nonces. We show that QUIC uses an instance of a generic construction parameterized by a standard AEAD-secure scheme and a PRF-secure cipher. We formalize and verify the security of this construction in F. The proof uncovers interesting limitations of nonce confidentiality, due to the malleability of short headers and the ability to choose the number of least significant bits included in the packet counter. We propose improvements that simplify the proof and increase robustness against strong attacker models. In addition to the verified security model, we also give a concrete functional specification for the record layer, and prove that it satisfies important functionality properties (such as the correct successful decryption of encrypted packets) after fixing more errors in the draft. We then provide a high-performance implementation of the record layer that we prove to be memory safe, correct with respect to our concrete specification (inheriting its functional correctness properties), and secure with respect to our verified model. To evaluate this component, we develop a provably-safe implementation of the rest of the QUIC protocol. Our record layer achieves nearly 2 GB/s throughput, and our QUIC implementation’s performance is within 21% of an unverified baseline.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IETF QUIC记录层的安全模型和完全验证实现
借鉴早期的协议验证工作,我们研究了由IETF在草案版本30中标准化的QUIC记录层的安全性。与谷歌的原始协议和早期的IETF草案相比,这个版本的主要区别在于。它为我们的验证方法和工具链提供了一个有用的测试用例,同时,希望它也能引起人们对一个很少被研究但至关重要的新兴标准的关注。我们对QUIC包和头加密建模,它使用自定义结构来保护隐私。为了实现其目标,我们提出了一个具有半隐式随机数的身份验证加密的安全定义。我们展示了QUIC使用由标准aead安全方案和prf安全密码参数化的通用结构的实例。我们在f中形式化并验证了这种结构的安全性。由于短报头的延展性和选择包计数器中包含的最低有效位的数量的能力,证明揭示了非once机密性的有趣限制。我们提出了简化证明和增强对强攻击者模型的鲁棒性的改进。除了验证的安全模型外,我们还给出了记录层的具体功能规范,并在修正草案中的更多错误后证明了它满足重要的功能属性(如加密数据包的正确成功解密)。然后,我们提供记录层的高性能实现,我们证明它是内存安全的,相对于我们的具体规范(继承其功能正确性属性)是正确的,并且相对于我们验证的模型是安全的。为了评估这个组件,我们开发了QUIC协议其余部分的可证明安全的实现。我们的记录层实现了近2 GB/s的吞吐量,我们的QUIC实现的性能在未经验证的基线的21%以内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A2L: Anonymous Atomic Locks for Scalability in Payment Channel Hubs High-Assurance Cryptography in the Spectre Era An I/O Separation Model for Formal Verification of Kernel Implementations Trust, But Verify: A Longitudinal Analysis Of Android OEM Compliance and Customization HackEd: A Pedagogical Analysis of Online Vulnerability Discovery Exercises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1