PV Module Technology Comparisons: Comprehensive Study Differentiating Soiling Spectral Effects, Operating Temperature, and Climate Conditions

Tulio P. Duarte, A. Diniz, Suellen C. S. Costa, L. Kazmerski
{"title":"PV Module Technology Comparisons: Comprehensive Study Differentiating Soiling Spectral Effects, Operating Temperature, and Climate Conditions","authors":"Tulio P. Duarte, A. Diniz, Suellen C. S. Costa, L. Kazmerski","doi":"10.1109/PVSC45281.2020.9300463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Photovoltaic (PV) module performance depends upon a collection of inherent and related external parameters. The choice of a particular PV-technology for “best performance” at a location is sometimes based solely on the label specification or single operating condition—and may not consider multiple parameters that affect different technologies with distinctly different impacts. In this paper, the choice of appropriate PV technologies for moderate-to-harsh soiling/climate conditions is evaluated based upon frequently opposing parameters of spectral effects (relating to solar resource, module spectral response, and soiling layer properties) and module temperature (linked to module construction and absorber bandgap). This paper builds on a linear model based upon soiling rates and the temperature coefficients of the module technologies. The model is validated with extensive experimental soiling data for crystalline Si and thin-film CdTe, with model discussions for CIGS and a-Si:H—covering the range of bandgaps from 1.1 eV through 1.7 eV for valid intercomparisons. The paper provides analytical and correlated experimental information to predict, compare, and identify the “best-of-class” performances for these module types under tropical climate-zone conditions.","PeriodicalId":6773,"journal":{"name":"2020 47th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)","volume":"13 1","pages":"2099-2103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 47th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC45281.2020.9300463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Photovoltaic (PV) module performance depends upon a collection of inherent and related external parameters. The choice of a particular PV-technology for “best performance” at a location is sometimes based solely on the label specification or single operating condition—and may not consider multiple parameters that affect different technologies with distinctly different impacts. In this paper, the choice of appropriate PV technologies for moderate-to-harsh soiling/climate conditions is evaluated based upon frequently opposing parameters of spectral effects (relating to solar resource, module spectral response, and soiling layer properties) and module temperature (linked to module construction and absorber bandgap). This paper builds on a linear model based upon soiling rates and the temperature coefficients of the module technologies. The model is validated with extensive experimental soiling data for crystalline Si and thin-film CdTe, with model discussions for CIGS and a-Si:H—covering the range of bandgaps from 1.1 eV through 1.7 eV for valid intercomparisons. The paper provides analytical and correlated experimental information to predict, compare, and identify the “best-of-class” performances for these module types under tropical climate-zone conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光伏组件技术比较:综合研究区分污染光谱效应,工作温度,和气候条件
光伏(PV)组件的性能取决于一系列固有的和相关的外部参数。在一个地点选择特定的pv技术以获得“最佳性能”,有时仅仅基于标签规格或单一操作条件,可能不会考虑影响不同技术的多个参数,这些参数的影响明显不同。在本文中,根据光谱效应(与太阳能资源、组件光谱响应和污染层特性有关)和组件温度(与组件结构和吸收器带隙有关)经常相反的参数,评估了适合中到恶劣污染/气候条件的光伏技术的选择。本文建立了一个基于污染率和模块技术温度系数的线性模型。该模型通过晶体Si和薄膜CdTe的大量实验数据进行了验证,并对CIGS和a-Si: h的模型进行了讨论,涵盖了1.1 eV到1.7 eV的带隙范围,以进行有效的相互比较。本文提供了分析和相关的实验信息,以预测、比较和确定这些模块类型在热带气候区条件下的“同类最佳”性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optical Characterization of Defects in High-efficiency (Ag, Cu)(In, Ga)Se2 Optimization of Light-Induced Al Plating on Si for Substitution of Ag in Si Solar Cells Development of 2-sided polysilicon passivating contacts for co-plated bifacial n-PERT cells Potential of Solar Energy in Africa: Does Knowledge, Technology, Policy and Economic Match Investigating Degradation in Perovskite and Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cells Using Spatially and Spectrally-Resolved Absorptivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1