Rectosigmoid integrity after excision of nodular endometriotic disease: do we test appropriately?

Simon J. Gordon, Peter J. Maher, Martin Healey
{"title":"Rectosigmoid integrity after excision of nodular endometriotic disease: do we test appropriately?","authors":"Simon J. Gordon,&nbsp;Peter J. Maher,&nbsp;Martin Healey","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00433.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Objective</p><p>To highlight the necessity of adequately testing rectosigmoid integrity after resection of infiltrating endometriosis.</p><p>Subject</p><p>A 25-year-old woman with a past history of ablative treatment for endometriosis, symptoms suggestive of disease progression, and a palpable anterior rectal nodule.</p><p>Interventions and outcomes</p><p>Excisional treatment of all visible disease, including the rectal nodule was carried out. Rectal integrity was confirmed intraoperatively via the ‘Betadine’ test. The patient presented again 3 days later with clinical findings suggestive of a bowel perforation. Repair of the defect and a de-functioning colostomy were performed.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Although clinical bowel perforation is an uncommon event, the sequelae have far-reaching consequences for the patient's quality of life. The use of electrosurgical dissection may have contributed to delayed tissue necrosis and the subsequent rectal perforation. Current methods for testing colorectal integrity are reviewed.</p>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 3","pages":"147-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00433.x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00433.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To highlight the necessity of adequately testing rectosigmoid integrity after resection of infiltrating endometriosis.

Subject

A 25-year-old woman with a past history of ablative treatment for endometriosis, symptoms suggestive of disease progression, and a palpable anterior rectal nodule.

Interventions and outcomes

Excisional treatment of all visible disease, including the rectal nodule was carried out. Rectal integrity was confirmed intraoperatively via the ‘Betadine’ test. The patient presented again 3 days later with clinical findings suggestive of a bowel perforation. Repair of the defect and a de-functioning colostomy were performed.

Conclusion

Although clinical bowel perforation is an uncommon event, the sequelae have far-reaching consequences for the patient's quality of life. The use of electrosurgical dissection may have contributed to delayed tissue necrosis and the subsequent rectal perforation. Current methods for testing colorectal integrity are reviewed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结节性子宫内膜异位症切除后直肠乙状结肠的完整性:我们是否应该进行适当的检查?
目的探讨浸润性子宫内膜异位症术后直肠乙状结肠完整性检查的必要性。受试者:25岁女性,既往有子宫内膜异位症的消融治疗史,症状提示疾病进展,直肠前结节可触及。干预措施和结果对包括直肠结节在内的所有可见疾病进行了切除治疗。术中通过“倍他定”试验确认直肠完整性。患者3天后再次出现,临床表现提示肠穿孔。进行了缺损修复和功能性结肠造口术。结论临床肠穿孔虽不常见,但其后遗症对患者的生活质量影响深远。电外科解剖的使用可能导致延迟的组织坏死和随后的直肠穿孔。综述了目前检测结肠直肠完整性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microendoscopy in the operating room†: author's reply Broken needle tip in Cooper's ligament: high occurrence rate with the EndostitchTM suturing device† Ray Garry's reply to Prof. Dr Rudnicki's letter Reply to Jones Images of endometriosis: an interactive CD-ROM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1