Counseling Program Evaluation: A Key Pathway Through Implementation, Improvement, and Social Change

A. Lenz
{"title":"Counseling Program Evaluation: A Key Pathway Through Implementation, Improvement, and Social Change","authors":"A. Lenz","doi":"10.1080/21501378.2022.2029411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the next decade, our communities will be looking for ways to heal, grow, and flourish from the deleterious effects of historical inequities, an international pandemic, and a changing planet. Counselors can make unique contributions within these ventures, not just as direct service providers, but as those individuals who identify local-level needs by amplifying historically excluded voices and making complex data plainly understood; identifying and centering existing resources and assets; promoting inclusive planning early and often in a program’s lifecycle; supporting accountability through implementation monitoring; representing outputs and outcomes with transparency and in ways that are accessible to the nonscientific community; contextualizing impact across the ecology of human development; and establishing a program’s successes and growth opportunities as the foundation for value-added advocacy efforts. These may sound like weighty charges, but we are all involved in evaluations and evaluative thinking. When we toss a ball of paper to the bin, we watch to see if we’ve sunk the shot. When we pour a cup of coffee, we get a sense of the temperature before enjoying that bean-based sunshine. While there has always been a need for the systematic use of social science research methods to identify the practical value of programs to their stakeholders, the increased integration of counseling interventions into the fabric of community, education, and hospital-based interventions has cued a watershed moment for counselors to regard the inclusion of program evaluation theories and practices as integral features of our professional identity. Counselors’ training provides a unique foundation for conceptualizing the ecological context within which programs attempt to promote the development and well-being of individuals, groups, and communities across the lifespan. However, many preparation programs across behavioral health professions are not designed to bridge that potential with the evaluation-oriented theories, skills, and experiences that may optimize the potential for meeting community needs. It does not have to be this way. Through personal inquiry, continuing education, specialized training, facilitated engagement, and intentional advocacy efforts, counselors can increase their representation among the ranks of those who complete program evaluations. Make no mistake, whether identifying as evaluation scientists, impact evaluators, or just plainly, counselors who do program evaluation, we all have important roles in defining the pathway through representation of an implementation efforts value, opportunities for program improvement, and the related social changes. In 2017, Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE) featured a new Outcome-Based Program Evaluation submission category and has since shown commitment to the associated spirit by publishing articles related to program evaluation methods (Prosek, 2020) and demonstrations (Ikonomopoulos et al., 2021; Schwarz et al., 2020). This issue of CORE represents a continued commitment to counselors as program evaluators through https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2022.2029411","PeriodicalId":37884,"journal":{"name":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","volume":"65 1","pages":"1 - 2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2022.2029411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the next decade, our communities will be looking for ways to heal, grow, and flourish from the deleterious effects of historical inequities, an international pandemic, and a changing planet. Counselors can make unique contributions within these ventures, not just as direct service providers, but as those individuals who identify local-level needs by amplifying historically excluded voices and making complex data plainly understood; identifying and centering existing resources and assets; promoting inclusive planning early and often in a program’s lifecycle; supporting accountability through implementation monitoring; representing outputs and outcomes with transparency and in ways that are accessible to the nonscientific community; contextualizing impact across the ecology of human development; and establishing a program’s successes and growth opportunities as the foundation for value-added advocacy efforts. These may sound like weighty charges, but we are all involved in evaluations and evaluative thinking. When we toss a ball of paper to the bin, we watch to see if we’ve sunk the shot. When we pour a cup of coffee, we get a sense of the temperature before enjoying that bean-based sunshine. While there has always been a need for the systematic use of social science research methods to identify the practical value of programs to their stakeholders, the increased integration of counseling interventions into the fabric of community, education, and hospital-based interventions has cued a watershed moment for counselors to regard the inclusion of program evaluation theories and practices as integral features of our professional identity. Counselors’ training provides a unique foundation for conceptualizing the ecological context within which programs attempt to promote the development and well-being of individuals, groups, and communities across the lifespan. However, many preparation programs across behavioral health professions are not designed to bridge that potential with the evaluation-oriented theories, skills, and experiences that may optimize the potential for meeting community needs. It does not have to be this way. Through personal inquiry, continuing education, specialized training, facilitated engagement, and intentional advocacy efforts, counselors can increase their representation among the ranks of those who complete program evaluations. Make no mistake, whether identifying as evaluation scientists, impact evaluators, or just plainly, counselors who do program evaluation, we all have important roles in defining the pathway through representation of an implementation efforts value, opportunities for program improvement, and the related social changes. In 2017, Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE) featured a new Outcome-Based Program Evaluation submission category and has since shown commitment to the associated spirit by publishing articles related to program evaluation methods (Prosek, 2020) and demonstrations (Ikonomopoulos et al., 2021; Schwarz et al., 2020). This issue of CORE represents a continued commitment to counselors as program evaluators through https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2022.2029411
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咨询项目评估:通过实施、改进和社会变革的关键途径
在接下来的十年里,我们的社会将寻求从历史上的不平等、国际流行病和不断变化的地球的有害影响中治愈、成长和繁荣的方法。咨询师可以在这些项目中做出独特的贡献,不仅仅是作为直接的服务提供者,而是作为那些通过放大历史上被排除在外的声音和使复杂的数据清晰易懂来识别地方需求的个人;识别和集中现有资源和资产;尽早并经常在项目生命周期中促进包容性规划;通过实施监测支持问责制;以透明和非科学界可获得的方式展示产出和成果;整个人类发展生态的背景影响;建立一个项目的成功和发展机会,作为增值宣传工作的基础。这些听起来像是沉重的指控,但我们都参与评估和评估性思维。当我们把一团纸扔进垃圾桶时,我们会观察是否投中了球。当我们倒一杯咖啡的时候,我们会先感受一下温度,然后再享受豆子带来的阳光。虽然一直需要系统地使用社会科学研究方法来确定项目对其利益相关者的实际价值,但咨询干预越来越多地融入社区、教育和医院干预的结构,这为咨询师提供了一个分水岭,他们将项目评估理论和实践纳入我们的专业身份的整体特征。辅导员的培训为概念化生态环境提供了一个独特的基础,在生态环境中,项目试图促进个人、群体和社区在整个生命周期中的发展和福祉。然而,许多跨行为健康专业的预备课程并不是为了将这种潜力与以评估为导向的理论、技能和经验联系起来而设计的,这些理论、技能和经验可能会优化满足社区需求的潜力。它不必是这样的。通过个人咨询、继续教育、专业培训、促进参与和有意的宣传努力,辅导员可以增加他们在完成项目评估的人群中的代表性。毫无疑问,无论是作为评估科学家、影响评估者,还是仅仅是做项目评估的顾问,我们都在通过表现实施努力价值、项目改进机会和相关的社会变化来定义途径方面发挥着重要作用。2017年,咨询结果研究与评估(CORE)推出了一个新的基于结果的项目评估提交类别,并通过发表与项目评估方法相关的文章(Prosek, 2020)和示范(Ikonomopoulos等人,2021;施瓦茨等人,2020)。这一期CORE代表了通过https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2022.2029411对辅导员作为项目评估员的持续承诺
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE) provides counselor educators, researchers, educators, and other mental health practitioners with outcome research and program evaluation practices for work with individuals across the lifespan. It addresses topics such as: treatment efficacy, clinical diagnosis, program evaluation, research design, outcome measure reviews. This journal also serves to address ethical, legal, and cultural concerns in the assessment of dependent variables, implementation of clinical interventions, and outcome research. Manuscripts typically fall into one of the following categories: Counseling Outcome Research: Treatment efficacy and effectiveness of mental health, school, addictions, rehabilitation, family, and college counseling interventions across the lifespan as reported in clinical trials, single-case research designs, single-group designs, and multi- or mixed-method designs.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Emotion Focused Group Therapy Using Quality Indicators Scoping Review Methodology: A Practical Guide for Counseling Researchers Creating Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships in Counseling: Lessons Learned A Systematic Review of Data Analysis Decisions in Counseling Single-Case Research Designs to Inform Best Practices Effectiveness of DBT Partial Hospitalization Program for Adolescents and Young Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1