Prediction of Urban Non-point Pollution Load by Statistical Analysis of Data of Published Research and Its Reliability Evaluation –Statistical Analysis of Mean Load and Verification and Modification of Previously Proposed Model Using Newly Obtained Data–

N. Ozaki, K. Wada, M. Murakami, F. Nakajima, H. Furumai
{"title":"Prediction of Urban Non-point Pollution Load by Statistical Analysis of Data of Published Research and Its Reliability Evaluation –Statistical Analysis of Mean Load and Verification and Modification of Previously Proposed Model Using Newly Obtained Data–","authors":"N. Ozaki, K. Wada, M. Murakami, F. Nakajima, H. Furumai","doi":"10.2965/JSWE.44.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To verify a statistical model for predicting urban pollutant runoff developed in our previous research, newly obtained runoff data were compared with those predicted by the model. The proposed model previously was a regression model using parameters representing geological, rainfall, and hydrological characteristics. The targeted pollutants were COD, SS, TN, and TP, and their event mean concentrations (EMCs) for each rainfall were predicted. From the comparison, the model was found to predict the EMC to one order of magnitude. Moreover, the yearly mean EMC was evaluated from only the mean and standard deviation of all data for each index. The error ratio of the prediction of the mean of 50 rainfall events was within 50%. Furthermore, in order to consider the possible differences among different catchment areas, the EMC values for three catchment areas newly obtained were compared statistically with nationwide values obtained previously. Significant differences were found for one area out of the three which thus emphasizes the importance of the consideration of catchment area differences. Thereafter, the number of runoff samples in a specific watershed area required to detect the mean EMC difference from the nationwide database was derived statistically. This number was calculated to be 10 at most for detecting more than double or less than half of the database means. Lastly, a modified model that includes watershed area differences using a generalized linear mixed model was proposed.","PeriodicalId":16300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Japan Society on Water Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2965/JSWE.44.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To verify a statistical model for predicting urban pollutant runoff developed in our previous research, newly obtained runoff data were compared with those predicted by the model. The proposed model previously was a regression model using parameters representing geological, rainfall, and hydrological characteristics. The targeted pollutants were COD, SS, TN, and TP, and their event mean concentrations (EMCs) for each rainfall were predicted. From the comparison, the model was found to predict the EMC to one order of magnitude. Moreover, the yearly mean EMC was evaluated from only the mean and standard deviation of all data for each index. The error ratio of the prediction of the mean of 50 rainfall events was within 50%. Furthermore, in order to consider the possible differences among different catchment areas, the EMC values for three catchment areas newly obtained were compared statistically with nationwide values obtained previously. Significant differences were found for one area out of the three which thus emphasizes the importance of the consideration of catchment area differences. Thereafter, the number of runoff samples in a specific watershed area required to detect the mean EMC difference from the nationwide database was derived statistically. This number was calculated to be 10 at most for detecting more than double or less than half of the database means. Lastly, a modified model that includes watershed area differences using a generalized linear mixed model was proposed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于已发表研究数据统计分析的城市非点源污染负荷预测及其可靠性评价——平均负荷统计分析及新数据对原有模型的验证与修正
为了验证我们之前建立的预测城市污染物径流的统计模型,我们将新获得的径流数据与模型预测的数据进行了比较。先前提出的模型是使用代表地质、降雨和水文特征的参数的回归模型。目标污染物为COD、SS、TN和TP,并预测了每次降雨的事件平均浓度(EMCs)。通过比较,发现该模型能将电磁兼容预测到一个数量级。此外,仅从各指标所有数据的平均值和标准差来评估年平均EMC。对50次降雨事件的平均值的预测误差率在50%以内。此外,为了考虑不同流域之间可能存在的差异,将新获得的三个流域的EMC值与全国范围内的EMC值进行了统计比较。三个区域中有一个区域存在显著差异,从而强调了考虑集水区差异的重要性。在此基础上,从全国数据库中统计得出了检测平均EMC差异所需的特定流域径流样本数量。如果检测到数据库平均值的两倍以上或不到一半,则计算出该数字最多为10。最后,提出了基于广义线性混合模型的流域面积差异修正模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of a System to Support the Analysis of Post-Calibration-Type Mass Spectrometric Target Screening Test Results and the Elucidation of Spilled Chemicals in a Simulated River Water Sample Estimation of Filtration Rate and Habitable Condition of a Freshwater Bivalve (Corbicula sp.) in Lake Biwa Operation and Management of Treated Wastewater in Rural Sewerage with Intermittent-Aeration Activated-Sludge Process for Use in Irrigation Nitrification Potentials in River Estuary Receiving High-Concentration Ammonium Brine Waste from Natural Gas and Iodine Production Plants Aliphatic Amine Interference in Indophenol Reaction for Ammonia-Nitrogen Determination and Its Possibility as Quantitative Method for Aliphatic Amines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1