Interlaboratory comparison of an intestinal triple culture to confirm transferability and reproducibility.

In vitro models Pub Date : 2022-06-13 eCollection Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s44164-022-00025-w
Angela A M Kämpfer, Ume-Kulsoom Shah, Shui L Chu, Mathias Busch, Veronika Büttner, Ruiwen He, Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser, Roel P F Schins, Gareth J Jenkins
{"title":"Interlaboratory comparison of an intestinal triple culture to confirm transferability and reproducibility.","authors":"Angela A M Kämpfer, Ume-Kulsoom Shah, Shui L Chu, Mathias Busch, Veronika Büttner, Ruiwen He, Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser, Roel P F Schins, Gareth J Jenkins","doi":"10.1007/s44164-022-00025-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development and improvement of advanced intestinal in vitro models has received increasing attention in recent years. While the availability of relevant in vitro models is pivotal to advance the replacement and reduction of animal use in research, their robustness is a crucial determinant for intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility. We have developed a standard protocol to build a triple culture model combining two types of human intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2, HT29-MTX-E12) and macrophages (THP-1), which was tested for transferability and reproducibility between three laboratories. The epithelial tissue barrier development and triple culture stability were investigated as well as the models' responses to the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac in terms of barrier integrity, cytotoxicity, and cytokine release. The results of two partner laboratories were compared to previously established benchmark results and quality criteria. For the epithelial co-cultures, the results were overall highly comparable between the laboratories. The addition of THP-1 cells resulted in increased variability and reduced reproducibility. While good correlation was achieved in several endpoints, others showed substantial response differences between the laboratories. Some variations may be addressed with training or demonstrations, whereas others might be related to fundamental differences in the cell lines introduced during routine cell culture and maintenance. Our results underline the importance of interlaboratory transfer studies using standardised experimental procedures, including defined quality criteria and benchmarks, as well as of training when newly establishing complex in vitro models in laboratories.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44164-022-00025-w.</p>","PeriodicalId":73357,"journal":{"name":"In vitro models","volume":"89 1","pages":"89-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756443/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vitro models","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44164-022-00025-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development and improvement of advanced intestinal in vitro models has received increasing attention in recent years. While the availability of relevant in vitro models is pivotal to advance the replacement and reduction of animal use in research, their robustness is a crucial determinant for intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility. We have developed a standard protocol to build a triple culture model combining two types of human intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2, HT29-MTX-E12) and macrophages (THP-1), which was tested for transferability and reproducibility between three laboratories. The epithelial tissue barrier development and triple culture stability were investigated as well as the models' responses to the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac in terms of barrier integrity, cytotoxicity, and cytokine release. The results of two partner laboratories were compared to previously established benchmark results and quality criteria. For the epithelial co-cultures, the results were overall highly comparable between the laboratories. The addition of THP-1 cells resulted in increased variability and reduced reproducibility. While good correlation was achieved in several endpoints, others showed substantial response differences between the laboratories. Some variations may be addressed with training or demonstrations, whereas others might be related to fundamental differences in the cell lines introduced during routine cell culture and maintenance. Our results underline the importance of interlaboratory transfer studies using standardised experimental procedures, including defined quality criteria and benchmarks, as well as of training when newly establishing complex in vitro models in laboratories.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44164-022-00025-w.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肠道三重培养的实验室间比较,以确认可转移性和可重复性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization of a primary cellular airway model for inhalative drug delivery in comparison with the established permanent cell lines CaLu3 and RPMI 2650. Mechanical and functional characterisation of a 3D porous biomimetic extracellular matrix to study insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cell lines. Adipo-on-chip: a microphysiological system to culture human mesenchymal stem cells with improved adipogenic differentiation. Hybrid additive manufacturing for Zn-Mg casting for biomedical application. Development and characterisation of a novel complex triple cell culture model of the human alveolar epithelial barrier.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1