Modernist Ambivalence about Christianity

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE RENASCENCE-ESSAYS ON VALUES IN LITERATURE Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5840/RENASCENCE20217315
S. Kern
{"title":"Modernist Ambivalence about Christianity","authors":"S. Kern","doi":"10.5840/RENASCENCE20217315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kern argues that the responses of Friedrich Nietzsche, James Joyce, André Gide, D. H. Lawrence, and Martin Heidegger to Christianity made up a Weberian ideal type. Accordingly: They all were raised as Christians but lost their faith when they began university studies. They all criticized the impact that they believed the anti-sexual Christian morality, with its emphasis on sin, had had, or threatened to have, on their love life. For that reason they were militantly anti-Christian but also ambivalent about Christianity. They worked to replace the loss of Christian unity with non-Christian unifying projects in literature and philosophy. Virginia Woolf, who was raised as an atheist, conformed to many of these elements of the ideal type but added another in criticizing the fragmenting patriarchal society that supported the dominant patriarchal Church of England. She envisioned new man-womanly and woman-manly types who could cultivate their understanding and love for one another in less polarizing and more humanizing ways.","PeriodicalId":41054,"journal":{"name":"RENASCENCE-ESSAYS ON VALUES IN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RENASCENCE-ESSAYS ON VALUES IN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/RENASCENCE20217315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kern argues that the responses of Friedrich Nietzsche, James Joyce, André Gide, D. H. Lawrence, and Martin Heidegger to Christianity made up a Weberian ideal type. Accordingly: They all were raised as Christians but lost their faith when they began university studies. They all criticized the impact that they believed the anti-sexual Christian morality, with its emphasis on sin, had had, or threatened to have, on their love life. For that reason they were militantly anti-Christian but also ambivalent about Christianity. They worked to replace the loss of Christian unity with non-Christian unifying projects in literature and philosophy. Virginia Woolf, who was raised as an atheist, conformed to many of these elements of the ideal type but added another in criticizing the fragmenting patriarchal society that supported the dominant patriarchal Church of England. She envisioned new man-womanly and woman-manly types who could cultivate their understanding and love for one another in less polarizing and more humanizing ways.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代主义者对基督教的矛盾心理
克恩认为,弗里德里希·尼采、詹姆斯·乔伊斯、安德烈·纪德、d·h·劳伦斯和马丁·海德格尔对基督教的回应构成了一种韦伯式的理想类型。因此:他们都是作为基督徒长大的,但当他们开始大学学习时,他们失去了信仰。他们都批评他们所相信的反性的基督教道德,强调罪恶,已经或威胁到他们的爱情生活的影响。因为这个原因,他们激进地反基督教,但对基督教也很矛盾。他们致力于在文学和哲学上用非基督教的统一计划来取代基督教合一的丧失。弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫从小就是一个无神论者,她符合这些理想类型的许多元素,但她还批评了支离破碎的父权社会,这种社会支持着占主导地位的英国父权教会。她设想了新的男-女和女-男类型,他们可以用更少的两极分化和更人性化的方式培养彼此的理解和爱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Biblical Siblings, Being a Brother’s Keeper, and Fly Fishing as Therapy in Norman Maclean’s A River Runs Through It “If his compare with mine” Dante and America's Race Problem Beyond America and Back Again Action and Suffering, Knowing and Not Knowing in Murder in the Cathedral and the Bhagavad-Gita
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1