Systemic Quinolones and Risk of Retinal Detachment II: Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

Taher Mohamed Kadry, Habsah Mohamed, B. Lise M., M. Franco, M. Donald, Krewski Daniel
{"title":"Systemic Quinolones and Risk of Retinal Detachment II: Systematic Review of Clinical Trials","authors":"Taher Mohamed Kadry, Habsah Mohamed, B. Lise M., M. Franco, M. Donald, Krewski Daniel","doi":"10.23937/2378-3656/1410369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Quinolones represent a popular group of antibiotics that is favored by physicians due to their potency, broad-spectrum, unique mechanism of action, and reasonable safety. Concerns have been raised about a possible association between quinolones and retinal detachment (RD). Despite the emergence of resistance and availability of other treatment alternatives, quinolones remain a popular choice among physicians worldwide. Areas covered: This systematic review examined all original clinical trials in which a quinolone antibiotic was tested or used as a comparator, for evidence on occurrences of retinal detachment. We examined four major bibliographic databases, eight clinical trial registries, and grey literature sources including international conference proceedings, drug review networks and databases of pharmaceutical companies for ongoing or unpublished studies. This systematic review has been conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and has been registered in PROSPERO: CRD42020148747. Expert opinion: We identified 1,554 original studies that examined quinolone antibiotics between 1974-2020 on participants of different ages, ethnic/racial backgrounds, and health status. Among the 145 eligible trials identified, no cases of retinal detachment were reported. There was no evidence from clinical trials to question systemically administered quinolone antibiotics as a cause of retinal detachment in persons with no history of eye diseases.","PeriodicalId":10450,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3656/1410369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: Quinolones represent a popular group of antibiotics that is favored by physicians due to their potency, broad-spectrum, unique mechanism of action, and reasonable safety. Concerns have been raised about a possible association between quinolones and retinal detachment (RD). Despite the emergence of resistance and availability of other treatment alternatives, quinolones remain a popular choice among physicians worldwide. Areas covered: This systematic review examined all original clinical trials in which a quinolone antibiotic was tested or used as a comparator, for evidence on occurrences of retinal detachment. We examined four major bibliographic databases, eight clinical trial registries, and grey literature sources including international conference proceedings, drug review networks and databases of pharmaceutical companies for ongoing or unpublished studies. This systematic review has been conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and has been registered in PROSPERO: CRD42020148747. Expert opinion: We identified 1,554 original studies that examined quinolone antibiotics between 1974-2020 on participants of different ages, ethnic/racial backgrounds, and health status. Among the 145 eligible trials identified, no cases of retinal detachment were reported. There was no evidence from clinical trials to question systemically administered quinolone antibiotics as a cause of retinal detachment in persons with no history of eye diseases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统性喹诺酮类药物与视网膜脱离的风险II:临床试验的系统回顾
简介:喹诺酮类抗生素因其有效、广谱、独特的作用机制和合理的安全性而受到医生的青睐。喹诺酮类药物与视网膜脱离(RD)之间可能存在关联。尽管出现了耐药性和其他治疗方案的可用性,喹诺酮类药物仍然是世界各地医生的普遍选择。涵盖的领域:本系统综述检查了喹诺酮类抗生素被测试或用作比较物的所有原始临床试验,以寻找视网膜脱离发生的证据。我们检查了四个主要的书目数据库、八个临床试验注册库和灰色文献来源,包括国际会议记录、药物审查网络和制药公司的数据库,以获取正在进行或未发表的研究。本系统评价已按照PRISMA指南进行,并已在PROSPERO注册:CRD42020148747。专家意见:我们确定了1,554项原始研究,这些研究在1974-2020年间对不同年龄、民族/种族背景和健康状况的参与者进行了喹诺酮类抗生素的检查。在确定的145个符合条件的试验中,没有报告视网膜脱离的病例。没有临床试验证据质疑系统使用喹诺酮类抗生素是无眼病史患者视网膜脱离的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Delirium Improving Symptoms of Chronic Schizophrenia in Elderly: A Case Series De Winter Syndrome Secondary to a Blunt Chest Trauma Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: A Therapeutic Challenge When Eculizumab is Not Available Giant Acquired Fibrokeratoma of the Big Toe: A Case Report QuantiFERON in the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1