Theatre practitioners as unionists: art workers in post-independence Zimbabwe’s theatre sector (1980 – 1999)

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 N/A THEATER Studies in Theatre and Performance Pub Date : 2021-09-14 DOI:10.1080/14682761.2021.1979338
Nkululeko Sibanda
{"title":"Theatre practitioners as unionists: art workers in post-independence Zimbabwe’s theatre sector (1980 – 1999)","authors":"Nkululeko Sibanda","doi":"10.1080/14682761.2021.1979338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article attempts to frame and examine the structuring of labour struggles from the precarious subject position of theatre workers, without isolating these struggles into the occupational sector of the creative industries in the Zimbabwean context between 1980 and 1999. In this article, I frame theatre practitioners as ‘art – workers’ and collectives such as the NTO and ZACT as mobilising and organising agencies operating within the postcolonial Zimbabwean theatre industry. On the one hand, the NTO controlled and administered purpose-built theatres, provided funding as well as organised affiliates into a unity. On the other hand, ZACT organised multi-racial Zimbabwean theatre groups into a collective, providing and mobilising financial and organisational support towards the creation of a ‘national theatre’ narrative. Deploying resource mobilisation and rational choice theories, this paper submits that NTO and ZACT mobilized and coordinated their stakeholders towards addressing the precarious work conditions in the sector. This paper argues while attempts, through theatre associations, have been undertaken to organise the creative sector, this paper submits that the precarious nature of the work, employer-employee non-distinction, lack of legal rights knowledge and fierce inter-and intra-organisational competition complicates the process of re-mobilising and organising creatives in Zimbabwe","PeriodicalId":42067,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Theatre and Performance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Theatre and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2021.1979338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article attempts to frame and examine the structuring of labour struggles from the precarious subject position of theatre workers, without isolating these struggles into the occupational sector of the creative industries in the Zimbabwean context between 1980 and 1999. In this article, I frame theatre practitioners as ‘art – workers’ and collectives such as the NTO and ZACT as mobilising and organising agencies operating within the postcolonial Zimbabwean theatre industry. On the one hand, the NTO controlled and administered purpose-built theatres, provided funding as well as organised affiliates into a unity. On the other hand, ZACT organised multi-racial Zimbabwean theatre groups into a collective, providing and mobilising financial and organisational support towards the creation of a ‘national theatre’ narrative. Deploying resource mobilisation and rational choice theories, this paper submits that NTO and ZACT mobilized and coordinated their stakeholders towards addressing the precarious work conditions in the sector. This paper argues while attempts, through theatre associations, have been undertaken to organise the creative sector, this paper submits that the precarious nature of the work, employer-employee non-distinction, lack of legal rights knowledge and fierce inter-and intra-organisational competition complicates the process of re-mobilising and organising creatives in Zimbabwe
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为工会成员的戏剧从业者:独立后津巴布韦戏剧部门的艺术工作者(1980 - 1999)
本文试图从戏剧工作者不稳定的主体地位来构建和研究劳动斗争的结构,而不是将这些斗争隔离到1980年至1999年津巴布韦背景下创意产业的职业部门。在这篇文章中,我将戏剧从业者定义为“艺术工作者”,而像NTO和ZACT这样的集体组织则是在后殖民时期津巴布韦戏剧行业内的动员和组织机构。一方面,NTO控制和管理专门建造的剧院,提供资金,并将附属机构组织成一个整体。另一方面,ZACT将多种族的津巴布韦戏剧团体组织成一个集体,为创建“国家戏剧”叙事提供和动员财政和组织支持。运用资源动员和理性选择理论,本文提出NTO和ZACT动员和协调其利益相关者来解决该部门不稳定的工作条件。本文认为,虽然尝试通过戏剧协会来组织创意部门,但本文认为,工作的不稳定性质、雇主与雇员之间的不区分、缺乏法律权利知识以及组织内部和组织内部激烈的竞争使津巴布韦重新动员和组织创意人员的过程复杂化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Meaningful agency in participatory performance: a contextual approach Irish rebellion in-yer-face or consigned to history: Seán O’Casey’s The Plough and the Stars in 2016 Physical solidarity as feeling the feeling Daughters Opera: an epistemic representation of feminist solidarities Hyper-femininity as radical resistance: re-envisaging the starlet through a feminist practice of solidarity in It’s Sophie! (2018)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1