Detecting table clones and smells in spreadsheets

Wensheng Dou, S. Cheung, Chushu Gao, Chang Xu, Liang Xu, Jun Wei
{"title":"Detecting table clones and smells in spreadsheets","authors":"Wensheng Dou, S. Cheung, Chushu Gao, Chang Xu, Liang Xu, Jun Wei","doi":"10.1145/2950290.2950359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spreadsheets are widely used by end users for various business tasks, such as data analysis and financial reporting. End users may perform similar tasks by cloning a block of cells (table) in their spreadsheets. The corresponding cells in these cloned tables are supposed to keep the same or similar computational semantics. However, when spreadsheets evolve, thus cloned tables can become inconsistent due to ad-hoc modifications, and as a result suffer from smells. In this paper, we propose TableCheck to detect table clones and related smells due to inconsistency among them. We observe that two tables with the same header information at their corresponding cells are likely to be table clones. Inspired by existing fingerprint-based code clone detection techniques, we developed a detection algorithm to detect this kind of table clones. We further detected outliers among corresponding cells as smells in the detected table clones. We implemented our idea into TableCheck, and applied it to real-world spreadsheets from the EUSES corpus. Experimental results show that table clones commonly exist (21.8%), and 25.6% of the spreadsheets with table clones suffer from smells due to inconsistency among these clones. TableCheck detected table clones and their smells with a precision of 92.2% and 85.5%, respectively, while existing techniques detected no more than 35.6% true smells that TableCheck could detect.","PeriodicalId":20532,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 24th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 24th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2950290.2950359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Spreadsheets are widely used by end users for various business tasks, such as data analysis and financial reporting. End users may perform similar tasks by cloning a block of cells (table) in their spreadsheets. The corresponding cells in these cloned tables are supposed to keep the same or similar computational semantics. However, when spreadsheets evolve, thus cloned tables can become inconsistent due to ad-hoc modifications, and as a result suffer from smells. In this paper, we propose TableCheck to detect table clones and related smells due to inconsistency among them. We observe that two tables with the same header information at their corresponding cells are likely to be table clones. Inspired by existing fingerprint-based code clone detection techniques, we developed a detection algorithm to detect this kind of table clones. We further detected outliers among corresponding cells as smells in the detected table clones. We implemented our idea into TableCheck, and applied it to real-world spreadsheets from the EUSES corpus. Experimental results show that table clones commonly exist (21.8%), and 25.6% of the spreadsheets with table clones suffer from smells due to inconsistency among these clones. TableCheck detected table clones and their smells with a precision of 92.2% and 85.5%, respectively, while existing techniques detected no more than 35.6% true smells that TableCheck could detect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在电子表格中检测表克隆和气味
电子表格被最终用户广泛用于各种业务任务,例如数据分析和财务报告。最终用户可以通过克隆电子表格中的单元格块(表)来执行类似的任务。这些克隆表中的相应单元应该保持相同或相似的计算语义。然而,随着电子表格的发展,克隆的表可能会因为特别的修改而变得不一致,从而产生异味。在本文中,我们提出了TableCheck来检测表克隆和由于它们之间不一致而产生的相关气味。我们观察到,在其相应单元格中具有相同标头信息的两个表可能是表克隆。受现有基于指纹的代码克隆检测技术的启发,我们开发了一种检测这种表克隆的检测算法。我们进一步在检测到的表克隆中检测到相应细胞中的异常值。我们将我们的想法实现到TableCheck中,并将其应用到EUSES语料库中的真实电子表格中。实验结果表明,表克隆是普遍存在的(21.8%),并且有25.6%的带有表克隆的电子表格由于这些表克隆之间的不一致而产生气味。TableCheck检测表克隆及其气味的准确率分别为92.2%和85.5%,而现有技术检测到的真实气味的准确率不超过35.6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of fault localization techniques Model, execute, and deploy: answering the hard questions in end-user programming (showcase) Guided code synthesis using deep neural networks Automated change impact analysis between SysML models of requirements and design Sustainable software design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1