Ventilation and indoor air quality in retail stores: A critical review (RP-1596)

M. Zaatari, E. Nirlo, Daranee Jareemit, N. Crain, J. Srebric, J. Siegel
{"title":"Ventilation and indoor air quality in retail stores: A critical review (RP-1596)","authors":"M. Zaatari, E. Nirlo, Daranee Jareemit, N. Crain, J. Srebric, J. Siegel","doi":"10.1080/10789669.2013.869126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying air pollutants that pose potential adverse health exposures in retail stores will facilitate exposure mitigation. Assessing the role of ventilation in mitigating this exposure is important to understand the energy implications of maintaining acceptable indoor air quality. In this work, we summarize results from 28 papers that report ventilation rates and/or pollutant concentrations in retail stores. These results were compared to available standards as well as data collected in non-retail environments. The findings of this review are: (1) half of the stores tested met/exceeded ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2010 (ASHRAE 2010a; or California Code of Regulations Title 24-2010) for ventilation; (2) PM2.5, acrolein, formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde exceeded their established, most conservative limits/reference exposures for a few of the stores tested in the United States, and outside the United States, researchers reported PM10, benzene, and trichloroethylene as additional pollutants found at concentrations that exceeded their limits; (3) alternative control methods would be more effective, and possibly more economical, than ventilation; (4) meeting or exceeding the ventilation requirements does not necessarily negate the presence of pollutants above their suggested limits; and (5) using disability-adjusted-life-year (DALY) as a metric of disease burden, two pollutants were identified as priority hazards in retail stores: PM2.5 and acrolein. Control strategies should focus on decreasing exposure of retail employees to these pollutants generated indoors or infiltrated from outdoors.","PeriodicalId":13238,"journal":{"name":"HVAC&R Research","volume":"43 1","pages":"276 - 294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HVAC&R Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10789669.2013.869126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Identifying air pollutants that pose potential adverse health exposures in retail stores will facilitate exposure mitigation. Assessing the role of ventilation in mitigating this exposure is important to understand the energy implications of maintaining acceptable indoor air quality. In this work, we summarize results from 28 papers that report ventilation rates and/or pollutant concentrations in retail stores. These results were compared to available standards as well as data collected in non-retail environments. The findings of this review are: (1) half of the stores tested met/exceeded ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2010 (ASHRAE 2010a; or California Code of Regulations Title 24-2010) for ventilation; (2) PM2.5, acrolein, formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde exceeded their established, most conservative limits/reference exposures for a few of the stores tested in the United States, and outside the United States, researchers reported PM10, benzene, and trichloroethylene as additional pollutants found at concentrations that exceeded their limits; (3) alternative control methods would be more effective, and possibly more economical, than ventilation; (4) meeting or exceeding the ventilation requirements does not necessarily negate the presence of pollutants above their suggested limits; and (5) using disability-adjusted-life-year (DALY) as a metric of disease burden, two pollutants were identified as priority hazards in retail stores: PM2.5 and acrolein. Control strategies should focus on decreasing exposure of retail employees to these pollutants generated indoors or infiltrated from outdoors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
零售商店的通风和室内空气质量:一项重要审查(RP-1596)
确定零售商店中可能造成有害健康暴露的空气污染物将有助于减少暴露。评估通风在减轻这种暴露中的作用对于理解维持可接受的室内空气质量对能源的影响是很重要的。在这项工作中,我们总结了28篇报告零售店通风率和/或污染物浓度的论文的结果。这些结果与现有标准以及在非零售环境中收集的数据进行了比较。本次审查的结果是:(1)一半的受测商店达到/超过了ASHRAE标准62.1-2010 (ASHRAE 2010a;或加州法规第24-2010条)的通风;(2) PM2.5、丙烯醛、甲醛和乙醛超过了他们在美国测试的一些商店的既定的、最保守的限值/参考暴露量,而在美国以外,研究人员报告PM10、苯和三氯乙烯作为浓度超过其限值的额外污染物被发现;(3)替代控制方法将比通风更有效,可能更经济;(四)达到或者超过通风要求,并不一定可以排除超过建议限值的污染物;(5)使用残疾调整生命年(DALY)作为疾病负担指标,确定零售商店的两种污染物为优先危害:PM2.5和丙烯醛。控制策略应侧重于减少零售员工对室内产生或从室外渗透的这些污染物的暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
HVAC&R Research
HVAC&R Research 工程技术-工程:机械
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊最新文献
EOV Editorial Board The never-ending search Accelerating fast fluid dynamics with a coarse-grid projection scheme Numerical modeling of volatile organic compound emissions from ozone reactions with human-worn clothing in an aircraft cabin Dynamic simulation and analysis of ancillary service demand response strategies for variable air volume HVAC systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1