Leaf area, light transmission, roots and leaf damage in nine tropical plant communities

John Ewel, Faye Benedict, Cory Berish, Becky Brown, Stephen Gliessman , Moises Amador, Radaméz Bermúdez, Angel Martínez, Roberto Miranda, Norman Price
{"title":"Leaf area, light transmission, roots and leaf damage in nine tropical plant communities","authors":"John Ewel,&nbsp;Faye Benedict,&nbsp;Cory Berish,&nbsp;Becky Brown,&nbsp;Stephen Gliessman ,&nbsp;Moises Amador,&nbsp;Radaméz Bermúdez,&nbsp;Angel Martínez,&nbsp;Roberto Miranda,&nbsp;Norman Price","doi":"10.1016/0304-3746(82)90023-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The vertical distribution of leaf area by species; transmission of photosynthetically active radiation; root biomass and fine-root surface area; and leaf damage were measured in nine tropical ecosystems: six in Costa Rica and three in Mexico. Ecosystems studied included monocultures of maize (young and mature) and sweet potato; year-old natural succession and vegetation designed to mimic succession; a 2.5-year-old mixture of three arborescent perennials (cacao, plantain, <em>Cordia alliodora</em>); 2.7-year-old plantation of <em>Gmelina arborea</em>; coffee shaded by <em>Erythrina poeppigiana</em>; and an old, diverse wooded garden.</p><p>Leaf area index ranged from 1.0 in young maize to 5.1 in natural succession and the gmelina plantation. The vertical distribution of leaves was most uniform in diverse ecosystems, and most clumped in species-poor ecosystems. Light transmission was inversely proportional to leaf area, and two dense-canopied monocultures (sweet potato and gmelina) were nearly as effective at light capture as were some of the more diverse ecosystems. Optical density of the canopy ranged from &lt; 0.5 (35% transmission) in the young maize to &gt; 2.0 (&lt; 1% transmission) in the natural succession.</p><p>Large roots (&gt; 5 mm diameter) accounted for most root biomass in the older ecosystems at a soil dept of 5–25 cm, and fine roots (&lt; 5 mm diameter) were most important in the surface 5 cm in all ecosystems. The range of values for root biomass (39 to 422 g m<sup>−2</sup> to a depth of 25 cm) were similar to the range of values for leaf biomass (33 to 345 g m<sup>−2</sup>, and, with the exception of two monocultures, ecosystems with high leaf biomass also had high root biomass. The surface area of the fine roots was lower than leaf area, and ranged from 0.5 <em>to</em> &gt; 2.0 m<sup>2</sup> m<sup>−2</sup> of ground. Total root surface area increased with age and diversity, and the monocultures — even those effective at light capture — had low root surface area.</p><p>Herbivore damage on leaves of 35 species ranged from &lt; 2 to &gt; 16% of leaf area. Heavily damaged species contributed less to total ecosystem leaf area than did species damaged less than average. Ecosystem-level damage was not well correlated with age or diversity. Leaf damage in all ecosystems ranged from about 2 to 10% of leaf area, or &lt; 2 to &gt; 25 g m<sup>−2</sup> of ecosystem.</p><p>Young monocultures do not necessarily capture less light, provide less soil cover, and experience more herbivory than older, more diverse ecosystems. However, root surface area (and therefore possible nutrient-capture ability) is high only in ecosystems that are diverse or old, and this is an important design consideration for agroecosystems appropriate for the humid tropical lowlands.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100066,"journal":{"name":"Agro-Ecosystems","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 305-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3746(82)90023-3","citationCount":"60","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agro-Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304374682900233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 60

Abstract

The vertical distribution of leaf area by species; transmission of photosynthetically active radiation; root biomass and fine-root surface area; and leaf damage were measured in nine tropical ecosystems: six in Costa Rica and three in Mexico. Ecosystems studied included monocultures of maize (young and mature) and sweet potato; year-old natural succession and vegetation designed to mimic succession; a 2.5-year-old mixture of three arborescent perennials (cacao, plantain, Cordia alliodora); 2.7-year-old plantation of Gmelina arborea; coffee shaded by Erythrina poeppigiana; and an old, diverse wooded garden.

Leaf area index ranged from 1.0 in young maize to 5.1 in natural succession and the gmelina plantation. The vertical distribution of leaves was most uniform in diverse ecosystems, and most clumped in species-poor ecosystems. Light transmission was inversely proportional to leaf area, and two dense-canopied monocultures (sweet potato and gmelina) were nearly as effective at light capture as were some of the more diverse ecosystems. Optical density of the canopy ranged from < 0.5 (35% transmission) in the young maize to > 2.0 (< 1% transmission) in the natural succession.

Large roots (> 5 mm diameter) accounted for most root biomass in the older ecosystems at a soil dept of 5–25 cm, and fine roots (< 5 mm diameter) were most important in the surface 5 cm in all ecosystems. The range of values for root biomass (39 to 422 g m−2 to a depth of 25 cm) were similar to the range of values for leaf biomass (33 to 345 g m−2, and, with the exception of two monocultures, ecosystems with high leaf biomass also had high root biomass. The surface area of the fine roots was lower than leaf area, and ranged from 0.5 to > 2.0 m2 m−2 of ground. Total root surface area increased with age and diversity, and the monocultures — even those effective at light capture — had low root surface area.

Herbivore damage on leaves of 35 species ranged from < 2 to > 16% of leaf area. Heavily damaged species contributed less to total ecosystem leaf area than did species damaged less than average. Ecosystem-level damage was not well correlated with age or diversity. Leaf damage in all ecosystems ranged from about 2 to 10% of leaf area, or < 2 to > 25 g m−2 of ecosystem.

Young monocultures do not necessarily capture less light, provide less soil cover, and experience more herbivory than older, more diverse ecosystems. However, root surface area (and therefore possible nutrient-capture ability) is high only in ecosystems that are diverse or old, and this is an important design consideration for agroecosystems appropriate for the humid tropical lowlands.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
9个热带植物群落的叶面积、光透射、根系和叶片损害
各树种叶面积垂直分布;光合有效辐射的透射;根生物量和细根表面积;在9个热带生态系统中测量了叶片损害:哥斯达黎加6个,墨西哥3个。研究的生态系统包括玉米(幼玉米和成熟玉米)和甘薯的单一栽培;1年自然演替和模拟演替的植被;一种由三种多年生乔木植物(可可、车前草、科迪亚)组成的2.5年的混合物;树龄2.7年的林分;咖啡被赤藓遮蔽;还有一个古老的、树木繁茂的花园。幼玉米叶面积指数在1.0 ~ 5.1之间,自然演替和小麦草人工林的叶面积指数在5.1之间。叶片垂直分布在不同生态系统中最均匀,在物种贫乏的生态系统中最聚集。透光率与叶面积成反比,两种冠层密集的单一作物(甘薯和小甘薯)在光捕获方面几乎与一些更多样化的生态系统一样有效。冠层的光密度范围为<0.5(35%传播)在幼玉米中传播;2.0 (& lt;1%的传播)在自然演替中。大根(>在5 - 25 cm土层中,较老的生态系统中,细根(<在所有生态系统中,直径为5mm的表层最重要。根系生物量的取值范围(39 ~ 422 g m−2,深度为25 cm)与叶片生物量的取值范围(33 ~ 345 g m−2)相似,除了两个单一栽培外,叶片生物量高的生态系统根系生物量也高。细根表面积小于叶面积,在0.5 ~ >之间;2.0 m2 m−2接地。总根表面积随着树龄和多样性的增加而增加,即使是那些有效捕获光的单一栽培的根表面积也很低。食草动物对35种植物叶片的危害范围从;2到>叶面积的16%。重度受损物种对生态系统总叶面积的贡献小于中度受损物种。生态系统水平的损害与年龄或多样性没有很好的相关性。在所有生态系统中,叶片的损害范围约为叶面积的2% ~ 10%;2到>25 g m−2的生态系统。年轻的单一栽培不一定比更老的、更多样化的生态系统吸收更少的光,提供更少的土壤覆盖,并经历更多的草食。然而,根表面积(因此可能的营养捕获能力)只有在多样化或古老的生态系统中才高,这是适合潮湿热带低地的农业生态系统的重要设计考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Publisher's Note Subject index Author index Elsevier's dictionary of weeds of western Europe Energy and economics of intensive animal production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1