Comparison of the Level of Vitamin D in Preterm Infected and Uninfected Infants

H. Boskabadi, M. Zakerihamidi, Raheleh Faramarzi
{"title":"Comparison of the Level of Vitamin D in Preterm Infected and Uninfected Infants","authors":"H. Boskabadi, M. Zakerihamidi, Raheleh Faramarzi","doi":"10.15789/2220-7619-cot-8050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Despite the substantial progress in intensive cares, sepsis is still an important cause of neonatal mortality. Given the role of vitamin D in infection control; therfore, this study was conducted to compare vitamin D level in infected and uninfected preterm infants. \nMaterials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 87 preterm infants(45 infected infants and 42 uninfected infants) hospitalized in Mashhad Ghaem Hospital,Iran, during 2015-2017. . The subjects were selected by using convenience sampling. . The infected infants (n=45) included babies with clinical and laboratory findings compatible with infection and/or positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid cultures. The serum levels vitamin D were measured in all infants. A researcher-made questionnaire containing demographic, clinical and laboratory features of infants was used. In addition, independent t-test and chi-square test were applied. SPSS was used to perform the statistical data analysis. . \nResults: 83% of infants had Vitamin D deficiency 34.5%, 26.4%, and 21.8% of whom exhibited severe (less than 10ngml), moderate (10.1-20ngml), mild deficiency (20.1-30ngml), respectively. The mean vitamin D level of infants was 23.319.40ng/ml in the control group and 11.028.64ng/ml in the case group (P=0.000). In the case group, the mean vitamin D was 8.145.53ngml in early sepsis and 12.629.75ngml in late-onset sepsis (P=0.121). 95% of infected infants and 71% of uninfected infants had vitamin D less than 30ngml (P=0.003). \nConclusion: Vitamin D deficiency is very common in preterm infants. Serum vitamin D levels in infants with sepsis were lower than those in uninfected infants. Therefore, the correction of Vitamin D deficiency may contribute to better control of neonatal infection.","PeriodicalId":21412,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15789/2220-7619-cot-8050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the substantial progress in intensive cares, sepsis is still an important cause of neonatal mortality. Given the role of vitamin D in infection control; therfore, this study was conducted to compare vitamin D level in infected and uninfected preterm infants. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out on 87 preterm infants(45 infected infants and 42 uninfected infants) hospitalized in Mashhad Ghaem Hospital,Iran, during 2015-2017. . The subjects were selected by using convenience sampling. . The infected infants (n=45) included babies with clinical and laboratory findings compatible with infection and/or positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid cultures. The serum levels vitamin D were measured in all infants. A researcher-made questionnaire containing demographic, clinical and laboratory features of infants was used. In addition, independent t-test and chi-square test were applied. SPSS was used to perform the statistical data analysis. . Results: 83% of infants had Vitamin D deficiency 34.5%, 26.4%, and 21.8% of whom exhibited severe (less than 10ngml), moderate (10.1-20ngml), mild deficiency (20.1-30ngml), respectively. The mean vitamin D level of infants was 23.319.40ng/ml in the control group and 11.028.64ng/ml in the case group (P=0.000). In the case group, the mean vitamin D was 8.145.53ngml in early sepsis and 12.629.75ngml in late-onset sepsis (P=0.121). 95% of infected infants and 71% of uninfected infants had vitamin D less than 30ngml (P=0.003). Conclusion: Vitamin D deficiency is very common in preterm infants. Serum vitamin D levels in infants with sepsis were lower than those in uninfected infants. Therefore, the correction of Vitamin D deficiency may contribute to better control of neonatal infection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早产儿感染与未感染婴儿维生素D水平的比较
导言:尽管重症监护取得了实质性进展,但脓毒症仍然是新生儿死亡的重要原因。鉴于维生素D在感染控制中的作用;因此,本研究旨在比较感染和未感染早产儿的维生素D水平。材料与方法:本研究对2015-2017年在伊朗Mashhad Ghaem医院住院的87例早产儿(45例感染婴儿和42例未感染婴儿)进行了横断面研究。采用方便抽样的方法选择研究对象。受感染的婴儿(n=45)包括临床和实验室结果符合感染和/或血液或脑脊液培养阳性的婴儿。测定了所有婴儿的血清维生素D水平。研究人员制作了一份调查问卷,其中包含了婴儿的人口学、临床和实验室特征。采用独立t检验和卡方检验。采用SPSS软件对统计数据进行分析。结果:83%的婴儿存在维生素D缺乏症,其中34.5%、26.4%和21.8%分别表现为重度(低于10ngml)、中度(10.1-20ngml)和轻度(20.1-30ngml)缺乏症。对照组婴儿平均维生素D水平为23.319.40ng/ml,病例组婴儿平均维生素D水平为11.028.64ng/ml (P=0.000)。在病例组中,早期败血症的平均维生素D为8.145.53ngml,迟发性败血症的平均维生素D为12.629.75ngml (P=0.121)。95%的感染婴儿和71%的未感染婴儿维生素D含量低于30ngml (P=0.003)。结论:维生素D缺乏症在早产儿中很常见。败血症婴儿血清维生素D水平低于未感染婴儿。因此,纠正维生素D缺乏可能有助于更好地控制新生儿感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mice microglia cytokine profile changes under the influence of HSV-1 Synthetic thymic hexapeptide in the correction of alterations of antibacterial immune defense and normalization of the profile of proinflammatory cytokines in immunocompromized Children with local unlimited acute peritonitis Balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in young patients who passed active Immunization against SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 Pandemic Conserved linear B-cell peptides among the influenza A viral neuraminidases enhance the cross-protective potential of inactivated whole-virion influenza vaccine Characteristics of virus-specific immunological reactions following COVID-19 vaccination in heart transplant recipients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1