Role of multidetector computed tomography in evaluation of chest trauma

Shaimaa Zaian, Nahed Abd-Allatif, Lobna Saker
{"title":"Role of multidetector computed tomography in evaluation of chest trauma","authors":"Shaimaa Zaian, Nahed Abd-Allatif, Lobna Saker","doi":"10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_204_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Thoracic injuries represent a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in trauma. Radiologic imaging plays an important role to reach the diagnosis and can affect management of chest trauma. Objective To evaluate the role of multidetector computed tomography as an imaging modality in assessment of chest trauma. Patients and methods The current study included 60 cases referred to the Radiology Department known to be subjected to various types of chest trauma, the study was performed through the period from 6 to 24 months and was approved by our institution’s ethics committee. All patients gave their informed consent before inclusion in the study whenever their clinical condition is stable. Results The studied patients revealed that mean±SD of age was 27.28±16.20 years old, and males predominate females: 47 (78.3%) male patients, whereas females were only 13 (21.7%) patients. Patients were subjected to various modes of trauma, the commonest mode of trauma was blunt trauma by 86.7%, with motor vehicle accident that was the most leading cause (65%), while penetrating trauma was 13.3%. Different sites of fractures are shown: rib fracture seen in 23 (38.3%) patients, flail chest seen in 13 (21.7%) patients, facture of scapula was detected in four (6.7%) patients, fracture of clavicle seen in four (6.7%)patients, fracture of dorsal vertebrae occurred in 14 (23.3%) patients, and a single fracture of sternum (1.7%) was detected. Various pleural injuries were reported, with pneumothorax in 56.7%, tension pneumothorax 10%, and hemothorax in 20%. Lung parenchymal injuries in our study represent lung contusion that was the common finding in 53.3%, lung laceration in 5%, and atelectasis in 6.7%. According to the results, 95.0% of cases had no associated injuries, while 1.7% had hepatic laceration, 1.7% had renal laceration, and 1.7% had humerus fracture. Conclusion Multidetector computed tomography is a reliable imaging modality for assessment of chest trauma.","PeriodicalId":22975,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls","volume":"52 1","pages":"912 - 917"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific Journal of Al-Azhar Medical Faculty, Girls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjamf.sjamf_204_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Thoracic injuries represent a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in trauma. Radiologic imaging plays an important role to reach the diagnosis and can affect management of chest trauma. Objective To evaluate the role of multidetector computed tomography as an imaging modality in assessment of chest trauma. Patients and methods The current study included 60 cases referred to the Radiology Department known to be subjected to various types of chest trauma, the study was performed through the period from 6 to 24 months and was approved by our institution’s ethics committee. All patients gave their informed consent before inclusion in the study whenever their clinical condition is stable. Results The studied patients revealed that mean±SD of age was 27.28±16.20 years old, and males predominate females: 47 (78.3%) male patients, whereas females were only 13 (21.7%) patients. Patients were subjected to various modes of trauma, the commonest mode of trauma was blunt trauma by 86.7%, with motor vehicle accident that was the most leading cause (65%), while penetrating trauma was 13.3%. Different sites of fractures are shown: rib fracture seen in 23 (38.3%) patients, flail chest seen in 13 (21.7%) patients, facture of scapula was detected in four (6.7%) patients, fracture of clavicle seen in four (6.7%)patients, fracture of dorsal vertebrae occurred in 14 (23.3%) patients, and a single fracture of sternum (1.7%) was detected. Various pleural injuries were reported, with pneumothorax in 56.7%, tension pneumothorax 10%, and hemothorax in 20%. Lung parenchymal injuries in our study represent lung contusion that was the common finding in 53.3%, lung laceration in 5%, and atelectasis in 6.7%. According to the results, 95.0% of cases had no associated injuries, while 1.7% had hepatic laceration, 1.7% had renal laceration, and 1.7% had humerus fracture. Conclusion Multidetector computed tomography is a reliable imaging modality for assessment of chest trauma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多探测器计算机断层扫描在胸部创伤评估中的作用
背景:胸部损伤是创伤中发病率和死亡率的重要原因。放射影像在胸部创伤的诊断和治疗中起着重要的作用。目的探讨多探头计算机断层扫描在胸部外伤诊断中的作用。患者和方法本研究纳入60例转诊至放射科的已知不同类型胸部创伤患者,研究时间为6至24个月,并经我院伦理委员会批准。所有患者在纳入研究前,只要其临床状况稳定,均给予知情同意。结果本组患者年龄平均±SD为27.28±16.20岁,男性居多,男性47例(78.3%),女性13例(21.7%)。患者外伤类型多样,以钝器外伤最常见,占86.7%,以机动车事故为主(65%),穿透性外伤占13.3%。不同部位骨折:肋骨骨折23例(38.3%),连枷胸13例(21.7%),肩胛骨骨折4例(6.7%),锁骨骨折4例(6.7%),脊椎骨骨折14例(23.3%),胸骨单一骨折1例(1.7%)。报告了各种胸膜损伤,其中气胸占56.7%,张力性气胸占10%,血胸占20%。在我们的研究中,肺实质损伤包括肺挫伤(53.3%)、肺撕裂(5%)和肺不张(6.7%)。结果显示,95.0%的患者无相关损伤,1.7%的患者有肝裂伤,1.7%的患者有肾裂伤,1.7%的患者有肱骨骨折。结论多层ct是一种可靠的胸部创伤诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of nanofat injection in postburn and post-traumatic facial scars Immunological markers changes in pediatric immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura Minimally invasive strabismus surgery versus paralimbal approach for horizontal strabismus surgery Clinical applications of brain diffusion-tensor imaging and fiber tractography Choroidal and retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses in smokers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1