The virtues and practical reason. Introductory considerations

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY Philosophical Inquiries Pub Date : 2019-11-05 DOI:10.4454/PHILINQ.V7I2.262
G. Anna
{"title":"The virtues and practical reason. Introductory considerations","authors":"G. Anna","doi":"10.4454/PHILINQ.V7I2.262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current discussions on practical reason often overlook the contribution that virtue ethics can offer to that topic. Virtue ethics might seem unrelated to practical reason, since it ensued from Elizabeth Anscombe’s emphasis on the first-personal perspective in the explanation of action and focuses on the character of the agent, rather than on reason. This paper suggests that the focus on character is not incompatible with the acknowledgement of the relevance of practical reason in action, but, quite the contrary, offers a privileged standpoint to understand how reason can operate in practice.","PeriodicalId":41386,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Inquiries","volume":"9 1","pages":"63-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Inquiries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4454/PHILINQ.V7I2.262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current discussions on practical reason often overlook the contribution that virtue ethics can offer to that topic. Virtue ethics might seem unrelated to practical reason, since it ensued from Elizabeth Anscombe’s emphasis on the first-personal perspective in the explanation of action and focuses on the character of the agent, rather than on reason. This paper suggests that the focus on character is not incompatible with the acknowledgement of the relevance of practical reason in action, but, quite the contrary, offers a privileged standpoint to understand how reason can operate in practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美德与实际的理性。介绍注意事项
目前关于实践理性的讨论往往忽视了美德伦理对这一主题的贡献。美德伦理似乎与实践理性无关,因为它源于伊丽莎白·安斯科姆(Elizabeth Anscombe)在解释行为时强调的第一人称视角,关注的是行为人的性格,而不是理性。本文认为,对性格的关注与对实践理性在行动中的相关性的承认并不矛盾,相反,它提供了一个特权的立场来理解理性如何在实践中运作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Commentary to B. William’s French introduction to "Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy" Sonic obstacles and conceptual nostalgia: Preliminary considerations on musical conceptualism and contemporary art Intergenerational aesthetics: A future-oriented approach to aesthetic theory and practice Presentism and the Pain of the Past: A Reply to Orilia “Who inspires who?” Aesthetics in front of AI art
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1