Presenting signs and symptoms of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion

Linley Diao, S. Nealon, Gianpaolo P. Carpinito, S. Badkhshan, A. Wolfe, Benjamin M. Dropkin, S. Sanders, S. Hudak, Allen F. Morey
{"title":"Presenting signs and symptoms of artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion","authors":"Linley Diao, S. Nealon, Gianpaolo P. Carpinito, S. Badkhshan, A. Wolfe, Benjamin M. Dropkin, S. Sanders, S. Hudak, Allen F. Morey","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose To characterize the most common presentation and clinical risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) cuff erosion to distinguish the relative frequency of symptoms that should trigger further evaluation in these patients. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed our tertiary center database to identify men who presented with AUS cuff erosion between 2007 – 2020. A similar cohort of men who underwent AUS placement without erosion were randomly selected from the same database for symptom comparison. Risk factors for cuff erosion – pelvic radiation, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 8) – were recorded for each patient. Presenting signs and symptoms of cuff erosion were grouped into three categories: obstructive symptoms, worsening incontinence, and localized scrotal inflammation (SI). Results Of 893 men who underwent AUS placement during the study interval, 61 (6.8%) sustained cuff erosion. Most erosion patients (40/61, 66%) presented with scrotal inflammatory changes including tenderness, erythema, and swelling. Fewer men reported obstructive symptoms (26/61, 43%) and worsening incontinence (21/61, 34%). Men with SI or obstructive symptoms presented significantly earlier than those with worsening incontinence (SI 14 ± 18 vs. obstructive symptoms 15 ± 16 vs. incontinence 37 ± 48 months after AUS insertion, p<0.01). Relative to the non-erosion control group (n=61), men who suffered erosion had a higher prevalence of pelvic radiation (71 vs. 49%, p=0.02). Conclusion AUS cuff erosion most commonly presents as SI symptoms. Obstructive voiding symptoms and worsening incontinence are also common. Any of these symptoms should prompt further investigation of cuff erosion.","PeriodicalId":13674,"journal":{"name":"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology","volume":"36 1","pages":"679 - 685"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Brazilian Journal of Urology : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.0089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose To characterize the most common presentation and clinical risk factors for artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) cuff erosion to distinguish the relative frequency of symptoms that should trigger further evaluation in these patients. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed our tertiary center database to identify men who presented with AUS cuff erosion between 2007 – 2020. A similar cohort of men who underwent AUS placement without erosion were randomly selected from the same database for symptom comparison. Risk factors for cuff erosion – pelvic radiation, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥ 8) – were recorded for each patient. Presenting signs and symptoms of cuff erosion were grouped into three categories: obstructive symptoms, worsening incontinence, and localized scrotal inflammation (SI). Results Of 893 men who underwent AUS placement during the study interval, 61 (6.8%) sustained cuff erosion. Most erosion patients (40/61, 66%) presented with scrotal inflammatory changes including tenderness, erythema, and swelling. Fewer men reported obstructive symptoms (26/61, 43%) and worsening incontinence (21/61, 34%). Men with SI or obstructive symptoms presented significantly earlier than those with worsening incontinence (SI 14 ± 18 vs. obstructive symptoms 15 ± 16 vs. incontinence 37 ± 48 months after AUS insertion, p<0.01). Relative to the non-erosion control group (n=61), men who suffered erosion had a higher prevalence of pelvic radiation (71 vs. 49%, p=0.02). Conclusion AUS cuff erosion most commonly presents as SI symptoms. Obstructive voiding symptoms and worsening incontinence are also common. Any of these symptoms should prompt further investigation of cuff erosion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
出现人工尿括约肌套糜烂的体征和症状
【摘要】目的探讨人工尿括约肌(AUS)袖带糜烂最常见的表现和临床危险因素,以区分这些患者中应引起进一步评估的症状的相对频率。材料和方法我们回顾性地回顾了我们的三级中心数据库,以确定2007 - 2020年期间出现AUS袖口糜烂的男性。从相同的数据库中随机选择一组接受AUS放置而无糜烂的男性进行症状比较。记录每位患者袖口糜烂的危险因素——盆腔放疗、雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)、高级别前列腺癌(Gleason评分≥8)。出现袖带糜烂的症状和体征分为三类:梗阻性症状、失禁加重和局限性阴囊炎症(SI)。结果在研究期间接受AUS放置的893名男性中,61名(6.8%)出现袖带糜烂。大多数糜烂患者(40/61,66%)表现为阴囊炎症改变,包括压痛、红斑和肿胀。较少的男性报告梗阻症状(26/61,43%)和失禁恶化(21/61,34%)。有SI或梗阻性症状的男性出现时间明显早于失禁加重的男性(SI 14±18个月vs梗阻性症状15±16个月vs失禁37±48个月,p<0.01)。与非糜烂对照组(n=61)相比,糜烂患者盆腔放射的患病率更高(71比49%,p=0.02)。结论AUS袖口糜烂最常表现为SI症状。梗阻性排尿症状和恶化的尿失禁也很常见。任何这些症状应提示进一步调查袖口糜烂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advocating hormonal treatment to prevent adult infertility in patients diagnosed with congenital undescended testes REPLY TO THE AUTHORS: Re: One-day voiding diary in the evaluation of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in children Vesical imaging reporting and data system (VI-RADS) in bladder cancer diagnosis in review in this number of International Brazilian Journal of Urology The evolution of stress urinary incontinence treatment techniques of the last three decades Impact of artificial urinary sphincter erosion in the reimplantation of the device
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1