Verifying hyperproperties of hardware systems

B. Finkbeiner, Markus N. Rabe
{"title":"Verifying hyperproperties of hardware systems","authors":"B. Finkbeiner, Markus N. Rabe","doi":"10.1109/FMCAD.2016.7886651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This tutorial presents hardware verification techniques for hyperproperties. The most prominent application of hyperproperties is information flow security: information flow policies characterize the secrecy and integrity of a system by comparing two or more execution traces, for example by comparing the observations made by an external observer on execution traces that result from different values of a secret variable. Such a comparison cannot be represented as a set of traces and thus falls outside the standard notion of trace properties. A comparison between execution traces can, however, be represented as a set of sets of traces, which is called a hyperproperty. Hyperproperties occur naturally in many applications beyond their origins in security: examples include the symmetric access to critical resources in distributed protocols and Hamming distances between code words in coding theory. The hardware verification approach of the tutorial is based on recently developed temporal logics for hyperproperties. Unlike classic temporal logics like LTL or CTL, which refer to one computation path at a time, temporal logics for hyperproperties like HyperLTL and HyperCTL can express properties that relate multiple traces by explicitly quantifying over multiple computation paths simultaneously. We will relate the logics to the linear-branching spectrum of process equivalences, and show that even though the satisfiability problem of the logics is undecidable in general, the model checking problem can be solved efficiently. We will show how the logics can be used to verify real hardware designs, including an I2C bus master, the symmetric access to a shared resource in a mutual exclusion protocol, and the functional correctness of encoders and decoders for error resistant codes.","PeriodicalId":6479,"journal":{"name":"2016 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD)","volume":"30 1","pages":"5-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Formal Methods in Computer-Aided Design (FMCAD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FMCAD.2016.7886651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This tutorial presents hardware verification techniques for hyperproperties. The most prominent application of hyperproperties is information flow security: information flow policies characterize the secrecy and integrity of a system by comparing two or more execution traces, for example by comparing the observations made by an external observer on execution traces that result from different values of a secret variable. Such a comparison cannot be represented as a set of traces and thus falls outside the standard notion of trace properties. A comparison between execution traces can, however, be represented as a set of sets of traces, which is called a hyperproperty. Hyperproperties occur naturally in many applications beyond their origins in security: examples include the symmetric access to critical resources in distributed protocols and Hamming distances between code words in coding theory. The hardware verification approach of the tutorial is based on recently developed temporal logics for hyperproperties. Unlike classic temporal logics like LTL or CTL, which refer to one computation path at a time, temporal logics for hyperproperties like HyperLTL and HyperCTL can express properties that relate multiple traces by explicitly quantifying over multiple computation paths simultaneously. We will relate the logics to the linear-branching spectrum of process equivalences, and show that even though the satisfiability problem of the logics is undecidable in general, the model checking problem can be solved efficiently. We will show how the logics can be used to verify real hardware designs, including an I2C bus master, the symmetric access to a shared resource in a mutual exclusion protocol, and the functional correctness of encoders and decoders for error resistant codes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证硬件系统的超属性
本教程介绍了超属性的硬件验证技术。超属性最突出的应用是信息流安全性:信息流策略通过比较两个或多个执行轨迹来描述系统的保密性和完整性,例如,通过比较外部观察者对由秘密变量的不同值所产生的执行轨迹的观察结果。这种比较不能表示为一组轨迹,因此不属于轨迹属性的标准概念。但是,执行跟踪之间的比较可以表示为跟踪集的集合,这称为超属性。超属性在许多应用程序中自然出现,超出了它们在安全性中的起源:示例包括分布式协议中对关键资源的对称访问和编码理论中码字之间的汉明距离。本教程的硬件验证方法基于最近开发的超属性时态逻辑。与经典的时间逻辑(如LTL或CTL)一次引用一条计算路径不同,超属性(如HyperLTL和hypertl)的时间逻辑可以通过同时显式量化多个计算路径来表达与多个跟踪相关的属性。我们将逻辑与过程等价的线性分支谱联系起来,并证明即使逻辑的可满足性问题一般是不可判定的,模型检验问题也可以有效地解决。我们将展示如何使用逻辑来验证真实的硬件设计,包括I2C总线主机,在互斥协议中对共享资源的对称访问,以及编码器和解码器的功能正确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The FMCAD 2022 Student Forum How Testable is Business Software? The FMCAD 2020 Student Forum From Correctness to High Quality Concurrent Chaining Hash Maps for Software Model Checking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1