Taxonomic status of the Western Hemispingus Sphenopsis ochracea (Thraupidae) and a review of species limits in the genus Sphenopsis P. L. Sclater, 1861
{"title":"Taxonomic status of the Western Hemispingus Sphenopsis ochracea (Thraupidae) and a review of species limits in the genus Sphenopsis P. L. Sclater, 1861","authors":"Matthew R. Halley","doi":"10.25226/bboc.v142i2.2022.a5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary. The genus Sphenopsis P. L. Sclater, 1861, has recently been restored to recognise the genetic monophyly of four Neotropical tanager species, formerly placed in the genus Hemispingus Cabanis, 1851, which are little known and poorly represented in museum collections: Oleaginous Hemispingus Sphenopsis frontalis (von Tschudi, 1844), Black-eared Hemispingus S. melanotis (P. L. Sclater, 1855), Western Hemispingus S. ochracea (von Berlepsch & Taczanowski, 1884) and Piura Hemispingus S. piurae (Chapman, 1923). Only ten study skins of S. ochracea are known in collections; prior to this study, just seven were known and no collection had adults of both sexes. The paucity of specimens has caused a considerable amount of confusion about the morphology of S. ochracea, both in published literature and private discussions among ornithologists. To review species limits, I assembled and photographed a comprehensive sample of study skins of Sphenopsis species, including S. ochracea study skins of both sexes, under a single light source, and compared plumage characters to published colour standards. I also quantified and analysed morphometric variation. These data expose multiple errors in published literature and scientific illustrations, and support recognition of S. ochracea and S. piurae at species rank.","PeriodicalId":38973,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club","volume":"1 1","pages":"209 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v142i2.2022.a5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Summary. The genus Sphenopsis P. L. Sclater, 1861, has recently been restored to recognise the genetic monophyly of four Neotropical tanager species, formerly placed in the genus Hemispingus Cabanis, 1851, which are little known and poorly represented in museum collections: Oleaginous Hemispingus Sphenopsis frontalis (von Tschudi, 1844), Black-eared Hemispingus S. melanotis (P. L. Sclater, 1855), Western Hemispingus S. ochracea (von Berlepsch & Taczanowski, 1884) and Piura Hemispingus S. piurae (Chapman, 1923). Only ten study skins of S. ochracea are known in collections; prior to this study, just seven were known and no collection had adults of both sexes. The paucity of specimens has caused a considerable amount of confusion about the morphology of S. ochracea, both in published literature and private discussions among ornithologists. To review species limits, I assembled and photographed a comprehensive sample of study skins of Sphenopsis species, including S. ochracea study skins of both sexes, under a single light source, and compared plumage characters to published colour standards. I also quantified and analysed morphometric variation. These data expose multiple errors in published literature and scientific illustrations, and support recognition of S. ochracea and S. piurae at species rank.
西半球Sphenopsis ochracea (Thraupidae)的分类地位和Sphenopsis属的种限评述P. L. Sclater, 1861
总结。Sphenopsis P. L. Sclater属,1861年,最近被恢复,以识别四种新热带tanager物种的遗传单系性,这些物种以前被置于1851年的Hemispingus Cabanis属中,很少为人所知,在博物馆藏品中也很少有代表性。产油半球us Sphenopsis frontalis (von Tschudi, 1844),黑耳半球us S. melanotis (P. L. Sclater, 1855),西半球us S. ochracea (von Berlepsch & Taczanowski, 1884)和Piura半球us S. piurae (Chapman, 1923)。目前已知的标本只有10种;在这项研究之前,只有7只已知,而且没有收集到成年男女。由于标本的缺乏,无论是在出版的文献中,还是在鸟类学家之间的私下讨论中,都引起了对紫锥菊形态的相当多的混淆。为了审查物种限制,我在单一光源下收集并拍摄了一组综合样本的研究皮肤,包括S. ochracea两性研究皮肤,并将羽毛特征与公布的颜色标准进行了比较。我还量化和分析了形态计量变异。这些数据揭示了已发表文献和科学插图中的多个错误,并支持了S. ochracea和S. piurae在物种级别上的识别。