The Effort-Reward-Imbalance Among PhD Students – A Qualitative Study

Q2 Social Sciences International Journal of Doctoral Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.28945/5020
Melanie Vilser, Sabrina Rauh, I. Mausz, D. Frey
{"title":"The Effort-Reward-Imbalance Among PhD Students – A Qualitative Study","authors":"Melanie Vilser, Sabrina Rauh, I. Mausz, D. Frey","doi":"10.28945/5020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the perceived efforts, rewards, motives, and coping strategies of a sample of PhD students in Germany based on tested stress models, the Effort-Reward-Imbalance Model and the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping. Background: Pursuing a PhD can be challenging and stressful. Students face conflicts, isolation, and competition as well as difficulties with their supervisors. However, there is little known about how students perceive their PhD. Methodology: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2021 with 21 male and female doctoral students from various fields of research. The recorded interviews were transcribed and analyzed according to Mayring’s qualitative content analysis. Contribution: Little is known about the work stress of PhD students. Most studies focus on single aspects (e.g., the relationship with the supervisor or the heavy workload) and use questionnaires that do not show all aspects causing work stress and how to prevent it. In this study, we examined the elements of work stress and coping strategies by using the Effort-Reward-Imbalance Model and the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping in a theoretical framework. Findings: The analysis yielded two main categories for efforts and three main categories for rewards as well as several sub-categories. Participants persisted in the PhD program for five reasons: an intrinsic motivation, an interest in improving one’s skills, the motivation to become an expert in one’s field, the ability to contribute to research, and because of the flexibility and freedom offered during a PhD. Further, the study analyzed how PhD students cope with stress. Engaging in physical activities or spending time with family and friends were the most common coping strategies used, followed by work routines (like scheduling time for deep work and breaks) and seeking assistance from other PhD students. Recommendations for Practitioners: To decrease the stress factors and negative health outcomes, we recommend incorporating personal as well as organizational measurements in the university setting. Through kick-off events and personal development workshops, PhD students should be made aware of the potential stress factors and coping strategies. Mentoring programs with postdocs can further support the doctoral students. On an organizational level, the knowledge about the elements of work stress should be incorporated in the recruiting process and supervisor workshops. Recommendation for Researchers: As past research has investigated the effects of stress on physiological parameters, the framework of this study proposes the incorporation of the imbalance component into biological stress research. Impact on Society: Understanding the efforts, rewards, and motives for a doctoral degree will help to reduce work stress of PhD students and create a more positive over-all workplace, for example, by improving the relationship between students and their supervisors. Future Research: Additional work is required to explore how the Effort-Reward-Imbalance model and coping strategies could interact and influence different outcomes. As the majority of the participants pursed a PhD degree in psychology, further studies need to be conducted that include other disciplines.","PeriodicalId":53524,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/5020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the perceived efforts, rewards, motives, and coping strategies of a sample of PhD students in Germany based on tested stress models, the Effort-Reward-Imbalance Model and the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping. Background: Pursuing a PhD can be challenging and stressful. Students face conflicts, isolation, and competition as well as difficulties with their supervisors. However, there is little known about how students perceive their PhD. Methodology: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2021 with 21 male and female doctoral students from various fields of research. The recorded interviews were transcribed and analyzed according to Mayring’s qualitative content analysis. Contribution: Little is known about the work stress of PhD students. Most studies focus on single aspects (e.g., the relationship with the supervisor or the heavy workload) and use questionnaires that do not show all aspects causing work stress and how to prevent it. In this study, we examined the elements of work stress and coping strategies by using the Effort-Reward-Imbalance Model and the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping in a theoretical framework. Findings: The analysis yielded two main categories for efforts and three main categories for rewards as well as several sub-categories. Participants persisted in the PhD program for five reasons: an intrinsic motivation, an interest in improving one’s skills, the motivation to become an expert in one’s field, the ability to contribute to research, and because of the flexibility and freedom offered during a PhD. Further, the study analyzed how PhD students cope with stress. Engaging in physical activities or spending time with family and friends were the most common coping strategies used, followed by work routines (like scheduling time for deep work and breaks) and seeking assistance from other PhD students. Recommendations for Practitioners: To decrease the stress factors and negative health outcomes, we recommend incorporating personal as well as organizational measurements in the university setting. Through kick-off events and personal development workshops, PhD students should be made aware of the potential stress factors and coping strategies. Mentoring programs with postdocs can further support the doctoral students. On an organizational level, the knowledge about the elements of work stress should be incorporated in the recruiting process and supervisor workshops. Recommendation for Researchers: As past research has investigated the effects of stress on physiological parameters, the framework of this study proposes the incorporation of the imbalance component into biological stress research. Impact on Society: Understanding the efforts, rewards, and motives for a doctoral degree will help to reduce work stress of PhD students and create a more positive over-all workplace, for example, by improving the relationship between students and their supervisors. Future Research: Additional work is required to explore how the Effort-Reward-Imbalance model and coping strategies could interact and influence different outcomes. As the majority of the participants pursed a PhD degree in psychology, further studies need to be conducted that include other disciplines.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
博士研究生努力-回报失衡的质性研究
目的:本文的目的是在测试压力模型、努力-回报-不平衡模型和压力与应对的交易模型的基础上,研究德国博士生的感知努力、奖励、动机和应对策略。背景:攻读博士学位充满挑战和压力。学生面临冲突、孤立、竞争以及与导师之间的困难。然而,学生如何看待自己的博士学位却鲜为人知。方法:于2021年对来自不同研究领域的21名男女博士生进行半结构化访谈。根据Mayring的定性内容分析对访谈记录进行转录和分析。贡献:我们对博士生的工作压力知之甚少。大多数研究都集中在单一方面(例如,与主管的关系或繁重的工作量),并且使用的调查问卷并没有显示导致工作压力的所有方面以及如何预防它。在本研究中,我们运用了努力-回报-不平衡模型和压力与应对的交易模型,在理论框架中考察了工作压力和应对策略的构成要素。研究结果:分析得出了两大类努力和三大类奖励,以及几个子类别。参与者坚持博士课程有五个原因:内在动机,对提高技能的兴趣,成为某一领域专家的动机,为研究做出贡献的能力,以及博士学位提供的灵活性和自由。此外,该研究还分析了博士生如何应对压力。参加体育活动或与家人和朋友共度时光是最常用的应对策略,其次是工作惯例(如安排深度工作和休息的时间),以及向其他博士生寻求帮助。对从业者的建议:为了减少压力因素和负面的健康结果,我们建议在大学环境中结合个人和组织的测量。通过启动活动和个人发展研讨会,博士生应该意识到潜在的压力因素和应对策略。博士后指导项目可以进一步支持博士生。在组织层面上,有关工作压力因素的知识应纳入招聘过程和主管研讨会。对研究人员的建议:由于过去的研究已经研究了应激对生理参数的影响,本研究的框架建议将失衡成分纳入生物应激研究。对社会的影响:了解博士学位的努力、回报和动机将有助于减轻博士生的工作压力,创造一个更积极的整体工作场所,例如,通过改善学生和导师之间的关系。未来研究:努力-回报-不平衡模型和应对策略如何相互作用并影响不同的结果,需要进一步的研究。由于大多数参与者拥有心理学博士学位,因此需要进行包括其他学科在内的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Doctoral Studies
International Journal of Doctoral Studies Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
A Framework of Rhetorical Moves Designed to Scaffold the Research Proposal Development Process What Does It Mean To Be a Resilient Student? An Explorative Study of Doctoral Students’ Resilience and Coping Strategies Using Grounded Theory as the Analytic Lens PhD by Prospective Publication in Australian Business Schools: Provocations from a Collaborative Autoethnography Mitigating Ceiling Effects in a Longitudinal Study of Doctoral Engineering Student Stress and Persistence Into the Challenges of Aligning Key Sections of Doctoral Dissertations: Cognitive Analysis, Pedagogical Tools, and Instrument Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1