Antibiotics Prescription Pattern and their Financial Burden before and after Intervention in Traumatic Injuries

IF 0.2 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Trauma monthly Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.30491/TM.2020.213791.1032
M. Raadabadi, A. Darvishi, B. Ahmadi, F. Soleymani
{"title":"Antibiotics Prescription Pattern and their Financial Burden before and after Intervention in Traumatic Injuries","authors":"M. Raadabadi, A. Darvishi, B. Ahmadi, F. Soleymani","doi":"10.30491/TM.2020.213791.1032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Antibiotics contribute to a lot of patients’ treatment. However, improper prescription and wasteful use of antibiotics may lead to various side effects or complications such as medicinal resistance and lack of treatment, resulting in an excessive financial burden. Objectives: The present study aimed to compare antibiotics prescription pattern and their financial burden before and after intervention based on prophylactic antibiotics guidelines in traumatic surgical sections. Methods: This analytical and cross-sectional study was conducted in 2018 on patients undergoing surgery in 4 general, urology, neurosurgery, and orthopedics surgery sections. The sample consisted of 464 patients with traumatic injuries. A researcher-made questionnaire was used as a principal instrument for gathering data. The data was analysed using SPSS (version 21). Results: The accordance of dose, method and kind of prescribed antibiotics with the instructions and guidelines after intervention increased to 29, 5.1 and 28.8%, respectively. There was a significant relationship between dose, method, and kind of prescribed antibiotic before and after the intervention (p <0.05). The financial burden of prescribed antibiotics before and after the intervention was 56400480 and 52789290 IRR, respectively. Conclusion: Based on the results, the intervention was effective in accordance with dose, method and kind of prescribed antibiotics. Also, financial burden reduced by 6.4% after the intervention. Continuous monitoring of antibiotic prescription based on instructions, training instructions of prophylaxis antibiotics to physicians, and infectious monitoring committee meetings can prevent irrational prescriptions and reduce the excessive financial burden on society, government and insurance organizations.","PeriodicalId":23249,"journal":{"name":"Trauma monthly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma monthly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2020.213791.1032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antibiotics contribute to a lot of patients’ treatment. However, improper prescription and wasteful use of antibiotics may lead to various side effects or complications such as medicinal resistance and lack of treatment, resulting in an excessive financial burden. Objectives: The present study aimed to compare antibiotics prescription pattern and their financial burden before and after intervention based on prophylactic antibiotics guidelines in traumatic surgical sections. Methods: This analytical and cross-sectional study was conducted in 2018 on patients undergoing surgery in 4 general, urology, neurosurgery, and orthopedics surgery sections. The sample consisted of 464 patients with traumatic injuries. A researcher-made questionnaire was used as a principal instrument for gathering data. The data was analysed using SPSS (version 21). Results: The accordance of dose, method and kind of prescribed antibiotics with the instructions and guidelines after intervention increased to 29, 5.1 and 28.8%, respectively. There was a significant relationship between dose, method, and kind of prescribed antibiotic before and after the intervention (p <0.05). The financial burden of prescribed antibiotics before and after the intervention was 56400480 and 52789290 IRR, respectively. Conclusion: Based on the results, the intervention was effective in accordance with dose, method and kind of prescribed antibiotics. Also, financial burden reduced by 6.4% after the intervention. Continuous monitoring of antibiotic prescription based on instructions, training instructions of prophylaxis antibiotics to physicians, and infectious monitoring committee meetings can prevent irrational prescriptions and reduce the excessive financial burden on society, government and insurance organizations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤性损伤干预前后抗生素处方模式及其经济负担
背景:抗生素在许多患者的治疗中起着重要作用。然而,抗生素的不当处方和浪费使用可能导致各种副作用或并发症,如耐药性和缺乏治疗,造成过度的经济负担。目的:比较外伤性外科科室预防性抗菌药物使用指南干预前后的抗菌药物处方模式及其经济负担。方法:对2018年在普通外科、泌尿外科、神经外科和骨科4个科室接受手术的患者进行分析和横断面研究。样本包括464例创伤性损伤患者。研究人员制作的问卷是收集数据的主要工具。使用SPSS (version 21)对数据进行分析。结果:干预后抗菌药物处方剂量、方法和种类与说明书和指南的符合率分别提高到29%、5.1和28.8%。干预前后处方抗生素的剂量、方法、种类有显著性相关(p <0.05)。干预前后处方抗生素的经济负担分别为56400480和52789290 IRR。结论:从结果看,按照处方抗生素的剂量、方法和种类进行干预是有效的。经济负担也在干预后减少了6.4%。根据说明书对抗生素处方进行持续监测,对医生进行预防性抗生素培训指导,召开感染监测委员会会议,可以防止不合理的处方,减轻社会、政府和保险机构的过度经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trauma monthly
Trauma monthly EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Dimensions of the Anterior Column of the Acetabulum with Imaging Criteria in Patients with Surgical Acetabular Fractures Mortality Prediction in Multiple Trauma Patients Using GAP, RTS and NTS Models The effect of Pregabalin on morphine consumption, sleep, mood and ability to change position after colorectal cancer surgery Titanium Elastic Nailing System, An Effective Way Of Pediatric Forearm Fracture Management Diagnostic Salivary Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1