SULFATE REMOVAL FROM COAL MINE WATER IN WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS, DESIGN, AND PERFORMANCE

W. J. Walker, J. Montoy, Tyler Chatriand
{"title":"SULFATE REMOVAL FROM COAL MINE WATER IN WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS, DESIGN, AND PERFORMANCE","authors":"W. J. Walker, J. Montoy, Tyler Chatriand","doi":"10.21000/JASMR15010073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The listing of the Monongahela River as an impaired waterway prompted the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) to adjust aqueous discharge limits to the river to no more than 250 mg/L of sulfate. In response to this, an analysis of water treatment options for a coal mining company was conducted at several non-operating mines in western Pennsylvania that discharge directly or indirectly to the Monongahela River. Given the extremely high capital and operations costs for typical sulfate reduction methods such as reverse osmosis and ion exchange, novel passive and semi-passive treatment options were explored. An ethanol-fed bioreactor system was selected, designed, and constructed in 2014 to test whether sulfate reducing bacteria could be utilized to remove sulfate in alkaline mine water to meet discharge limits. The unique design elements consist of metals removal circuit, ethanol feed circuit, and twin bioreactors bedded with large cobbles and seeded with sulfate reducing bacteria, but containing no additional carbon source. Biochemical performance has shown that sulfate reduction approaches 1500 mmol SO4 m -3/ day during warmer weather, one of the highest rates recorded in the literature. Effluent sulfate ranged from 58 to 400 mg/L at 16oC and about 1400 mg/L at 2oC compared to influent sulfate concentrations that averaged 2800 mg/L. In addition, the bioreactor produced 500-1500 mg/L of total alkalinity due to microbial metabolism supported by the ethanol, typically corresponding with sulfate decreases. Effluent metal concentrations were decreased to 1 mg/L Fe and 0.2 mg/L Mn. The recirculation loop was found to remove 90% of iron in the original settling pond prior to entering the reactors to minimize sludge accumulation. Additional","PeriodicalId":17230,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation","volume":"42 1","pages":"73-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Mining and Reclamation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21000/JASMR15010073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The listing of the Monongahela River as an impaired waterway prompted the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) to adjust aqueous discharge limits to the river to no more than 250 mg/L of sulfate. In response to this, an analysis of water treatment options for a coal mining company was conducted at several non-operating mines in western Pennsylvania that discharge directly or indirectly to the Monongahela River. Given the extremely high capital and operations costs for typical sulfate reduction methods such as reverse osmosis and ion exchange, novel passive and semi-passive treatment options were explored. An ethanol-fed bioreactor system was selected, designed, and constructed in 2014 to test whether sulfate reducing bacteria could be utilized to remove sulfate in alkaline mine water to meet discharge limits. The unique design elements consist of metals removal circuit, ethanol feed circuit, and twin bioreactors bedded with large cobbles and seeded with sulfate reducing bacteria, but containing no additional carbon source. Biochemical performance has shown that sulfate reduction approaches 1500 mmol SO4 m -3/ day during warmer weather, one of the highest rates recorded in the literature. Effluent sulfate ranged from 58 to 400 mg/L at 16oC and about 1400 mg/L at 2oC compared to influent sulfate concentrations that averaged 2800 mg/L. In addition, the bioreactor produced 500-1500 mg/L of total alkalinity due to microbial metabolism supported by the ethanol, typically corresponding with sulfate decreases. Effluent metal concentrations were decreased to 1 mg/L Fe and 0.2 mg/L Mn. The recirculation loop was found to remove 90% of iron in the original settling pond prior to entering the reactors to minimize sludge accumulation. Additional
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宾夕法尼亚州西部煤矿水中硫酸盐的去除:法规要求、设计和性能
莫农加希拉河被列为受损水道,促使宾夕法尼亚州环境保护部(PADEP)调整了对河流的水排放限制,使其硫酸盐含量不超过250毫克/升。为此,在宾夕法尼亚州西部几个直接或间接向莫农加希拉河排放污水的非经营性矿井对一家煤矿公司的水处理方案进行了分析。鉴于反渗透和离子交换等典型硫酸盐还原方法的资金和操作成本极高,探索了新的被动和半被动处理方案。2014年选择、设计并搭建了一个乙醇投料生物反应器系统,测试硫酸盐还原菌能否去除碱性矿井水中的硫酸盐,达到排放限值。独特的设计元素包括金属去除回路、乙醇进料回路和双生物反应器,反应器上铺有大块鹅卵石,并以硫酸盐还原菌为种子,但不含额外的碳源。生化性能表明,在温暖的天气下,硫酸盐还原接近1500 mmol SO4 m -3/天,这是文献中记录的最高速率之一。出水硫酸盐在16℃时为58至400 mg/L,在20℃时约为1400 mg/L,而进水硫酸盐的平均浓度为2800 mg/L。此外,生物反应器产生的总碱度在500-1500 mg/L之间,由乙醇支持的微生物代谢,通常对应于硫酸盐的降低。出水金属浓度降至1 mg/L Fe和0.2 mg/L Mn。在进入反应器之前,发现循环回路可以去除原始沉淀池中90%的铁,以最大限度地减少污泥堆积。额外的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A System to Evaluate Prime Farmland Reclamation Success Based on Spatial Soil Properties PENNSYLVANIA’S ABANDONED MINE LAND (AML) EMERGENCY PROGRAM THREE-DIMENSIONAL SEEPAGE ANALYSIS OF A COAL REFUSE PILE RECLAMATION PENNSYLVANIA’S ENVIRONMENTAL GOOD SAMARITAN PROGRAM DIMENSIONS IN POST-INDUSTRIAL LAND TRANSFORMATION IN PLANNING AND DESIGN: A PORTUGESE CASE STUDY CONCERNING PUBLIC PERCEPTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1