Aetiology of neonatal jaundice in apparently well late-preterm and term neonates at a mission hospital, Southwestern Nigeria

M. Alao, Y. Olasinde, D. Gbadero, O. Tongo, O. T. Adeleke, T. Slusher
{"title":"Aetiology of neonatal jaundice in apparently well late-preterm and term neonates at a mission hospital, Southwestern Nigeria","authors":"M. Alao, Y. Olasinde, D. Gbadero, O. Tongo, O. T. Adeleke, T. Slusher","doi":"10.4314/njp.v49i1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The knowledge of the aetiology for neonatal jaundice is important in the early detection and effective management of infants with or at risk of severe jaundice before hospital discharge. This study assessed the aetiological factors of neonatal jaundice among apparently well late preterm and termnewborns to ensure timely intervention where these risk factors exist.Method: This was a cross sectional study involving 174 apparently well neonates at a tertiary mission hospital. Detailed history, physical examination, relevant haematological and biochemical tests were undertaken. Significant jaundice was defined as serum bilirubin greater than 2 standard deviations above the postnatal age and weight dependent treatment concentration.Results: Of the 844 neonates admitted into the neonatal care unit, 174 (20.6%) had significant jaundice. Median age at presentation was 3 days (95% CI of median 3-4days). The mean ±SD gestation age and birth weight of the neonates at recruitment were 38.1±1.6 weeks and 3.1± 0.5kg respectively. Males were 108 (62.4%; M: F.1.6.1). The mean ±SD total serum bilirubin was 13.9±4.7mg/dl. Significant jaundice was more common with maternal-baby concordant paired blood group of AA, O-O compared with discordant materno-baby group pairs. Of the known causes of significant neonatal jaundice, G6PD deficiency (57-38.5%) ranked topmost. Half (87-50.0%) of the causes of significant jaundice were unidentified.Conclusion : G6PD deficiency remains the leading aetiology for significant neonatal jaundice. G6PD screening should be mandated before hospital discharge, compatible mother-baby blood group pairs do not rule the risk for significant jaundice; further research is required to elucidate other inherent unidentified aetiologies.","PeriodicalId":19199,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian journal of paediatrics","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian journal of paediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/njp.v49i1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The knowledge of the aetiology for neonatal jaundice is important in the early detection and effective management of infants with or at risk of severe jaundice before hospital discharge. This study assessed the aetiological factors of neonatal jaundice among apparently well late preterm and termnewborns to ensure timely intervention where these risk factors exist.Method: This was a cross sectional study involving 174 apparently well neonates at a tertiary mission hospital. Detailed history, physical examination, relevant haematological and biochemical tests were undertaken. Significant jaundice was defined as serum bilirubin greater than 2 standard deviations above the postnatal age and weight dependent treatment concentration.Results: Of the 844 neonates admitted into the neonatal care unit, 174 (20.6%) had significant jaundice. Median age at presentation was 3 days (95% CI of median 3-4days). The mean ±SD gestation age and birth weight of the neonates at recruitment were 38.1±1.6 weeks and 3.1± 0.5kg respectively. Males were 108 (62.4%; M: F.1.6.1). The mean ±SD total serum bilirubin was 13.9±4.7mg/dl. Significant jaundice was more common with maternal-baby concordant paired blood group of AA, O-O compared with discordant materno-baby group pairs. Of the known causes of significant neonatal jaundice, G6PD deficiency (57-38.5%) ranked topmost. Half (87-50.0%) of the causes of significant jaundice were unidentified.Conclusion : G6PD deficiency remains the leading aetiology for significant neonatal jaundice. G6PD screening should be mandated before hospital discharge, compatible mother-baby blood group pairs do not rule the risk for significant jaundice; further research is required to elucidate other inherent unidentified aetiologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿黄疸的病因学在明显良好的晚期早产儿和足月新生儿在一个教会医院,尼日利亚西南部
背景:新生儿黄疸的病因学知识对于在出院前早期发现和有效管理患有或有严重黄疸风险的婴儿是重要的。本研究评估了明显的晚期早产儿和足月新生儿黄疸的病因学因素,以确保在这些危险因素存在时及时干预。方法:对某三级教会医院174例健康新生儿进行横断面研究。进行了详细的病史、体格检查、相关的血液学和生化试验。显著黄疸定义为血清胆红素高于出生后年龄和体重依赖性治疗浓度2个标准差以上。结果:844例新生儿中,174例(20.6%)有明显黄疸。就诊时的中位年龄为3天(95% CI为中位3-4天)。新生儿入组时平均胎龄±SD为38.1±1.6周,出生体重3.1±0.5kg。男性108例(62.4%);M: F.1.6.1)。血清总胆红素平均值±SD为13.9±4.7mg/dl。AA、O-O血型的母婴配对血型显著性黄疸发生率高于血型不一致的母婴配对血型。在已知的导致新生儿黄疸的原因中,G6PD缺乏症(57-38.5%)排在首位。半数(87-50.0%)的严重黄疸病因不明。结论:G6PD缺乏仍然是新生儿黄疸的主要病因。出院前应强制进行G6PD筛查,相容的母婴血型对不能排除明显黄疸的风险;需要进一步的研究来阐明其他内在的未知病因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Educational Series 2024 Disclosure Rate and the Associated Factors Among Adolescents Living with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Gombe Metropolis, Nigeria Paediatric Emergency Admissions, Mortalities, and Unmet Intensive Care Needs at a Tertiary Hospital in Southern Nigeria Association of Undernutrition with Acute Diarrhoea and Recent Hospitalisation Among Primary School Children in Nnewi, Southeast Nigeria Foetal Alcohol Syndrome in a Nigerian Infant: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1