Lateral wedge osteotomy for pediatric post-traumatic cubitus varus: Kirschner-wires or locking angular plate?

P. Persiani, G. Noia, C. de Cristo, J. Graci, M. Gurzì, C. Villani
{"title":"Lateral wedge osteotomy for pediatric post-traumatic cubitus varus: Kirschner-wires or locking angular plate?","authors":"P. Persiani, G. Noia, C. de Cristo, J. Graci, M. Gurzì, C. Villani","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000000300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to evaluate and compare two types of internal fixation, locking angular plate (group 1) and Kirschner-wires (group 2), for post-traumatic cubitus varus. The parameters used were Laupattarakasem’s criteria (for range of motion in extension/flexion, correction of carrying angle, and the ‘lazy S’ deformity) and the Barrett’s questionnaire (for patient satisfaction). In group I (plate+screws), we had three excellent results and five good. In group II (Kirschner-wires), we had two good results, three fair, and two poor. Statistical analysis showed a better outcome for group I (plate+screws) considering the correction of the humeral-elbow-wrist angle (P<0.003), the postoperative lateral prominence index (P<0.048), and the patient satisfaction (P<0.011). We recommend the locking angular plate, because it can rigidly stabilize the osteotomy, ensuring an excellent functional and cosmetic outcome.","PeriodicalId":16709,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B","volume":"81 1","pages":"405–411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000000300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate and compare two types of internal fixation, locking angular plate (group 1) and Kirschner-wires (group 2), for post-traumatic cubitus varus. The parameters used were Laupattarakasem’s criteria (for range of motion in extension/flexion, correction of carrying angle, and the ‘lazy S’ deformity) and the Barrett’s questionnaire (for patient satisfaction). In group I (plate+screws), we had three excellent results and five good. In group II (Kirschner-wires), we had two good results, three fair, and two poor. Statistical analysis showed a better outcome for group I (plate+screws) considering the correction of the humeral-elbow-wrist angle (P<0.003), the postoperative lateral prominence index (P<0.048), and the patient satisfaction (P<0.011). We recommend the locking angular plate, because it can rigidly stabilize the osteotomy, ensuring an excellent functional and cosmetic outcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外侧楔形截骨治疗小儿外伤性肘内翻:克氏针还是锁定角钢板?
本研究旨在评估和比较两种类型的内固定,锁定角钢板(组1)和克氏针(组2),治疗创伤后肘内翻。使用的参数是Laupattarakasem标准(伸展/屈曲的活动范围、携带角度的矫正和“懒S”型畸形)和Barrett问卷(患者满意度)。在第一组(钢板+螺钉)中,我们有3个优秀的结果,5个良好的结果。在第二组(克氏针),我们有两个好结果,三个一般,两个差。统计分析显示,考虑到肱骨-肘关节-腕关节角度矫正(P<0.003)、术后外侧突出指数(P<0.048)和患者满意度(P<0.011), I组(钢板+螺钉)疗效更好。我们推荐使用锁定角钢板,因为它可以稳固截骨,确保良好的功能和美观效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of risk factors for nonunion in pediatric lateral column lengthening’ by Torrez et al. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography, standard computed tomography, and plain radiographs in the evaluation of medial epicondyle humerus fractures Letter to the editor, concerning Cimen et al.: ‘Percutaneous release for trigger thumb in children under local anesthesia’ Referral patterns to a pediatric orthopedic clinic: pediatric orthopedic surgeons are primary care musculoskeletal medicine physicians Reliability and validity of Vancouver Scar Scale and Withey score after syndactyly release
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1