Tanaka score predicts surgical intensive care admission following abdominal wall reconstruction.

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-16 DOI:10.1007/s10029-022-02605-x
S Said, J Thomas, K Montelione, A Fafaj, L Beffa, D Krpata, A Prabhu, M Rosen, C Petro
{"title":"Tanaka score predicts surgical intensive care admission following abdominal wall reconstruction.","authors":"S Said, J Thomas, K Montelione, A Fafaj, L Beffa, D Krpata, A Prabhu, M Rosen, C Petro","doi":"10.1007/s10029-022-02605-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With the advancement of abdominal wall reconstruction, more complex hernia patients are undergoing repairs that may require a postoperative surgical intensive care unit (SICU) admission. The volume ratio (VR) of the hernia sac to the abdominal cavity is an easily applied method to quantify disease severity and the ensuing physiologic insult. This study aimed to predict postoperative SICU admission using VR and other preoperative variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective review was conducted for patients undergoing large abdominal hernias (width ≥ 18 cm) repaired from September 2014 to October 2019. Patient demographics, comorbidities, abdominal surgical history, and VR were analyzed through univariate and multivariable methods to identify predictors of SICU admission within the first two postoperative days. A predictive model was generated and validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 434 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 127(29%) required a SICU admission within the first two postoperative days. VR was significantly higher in SICU patients (Median 30.6% [IQR 14.4-59.0] vs. 10.6% [IQR 4.35-23.6], P < 0.001). Male sex, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, prior component separation, recurrent incisional hernia, hernia grade 3, and VR showed higher odds of SICU admission. When validated on a testing dataset, these variables showed strong SICU admission predictions, with an area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.82, 81.7% and 68.5%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The volume ratio in combination with preoperatively available variables can reliably predict postoperative SICU admission following abdominal wall reconstruction. Anticipating such events preoperatively allows for bed space allocation as well as optimizing postoperative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":46210,"journal":{"name":"Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"873-880"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-022-02605-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: With the advancement of abdominal wall reconstruction, more complex hernia patients are undergoing repairs that may require a postoperative surgical intensive care unit (SICU) admission. The volume ratio (VR) of the hernia sac to the abdominal cavity is an easily applied method to quantify disease severity and the ensuing physiologic insult. This study aimed to predict postoperative SICU admission using VR and other preoperative variables.

Methods: A single-center retrospective review was conducted for patients undergoing large abdominal hernias (width ≥ 18 cm) repaired from September 2014 to October 2019. Patient demographics, comorbidities, abdominal surgical history, and VR were analyzed through univariate and multivariable methods to identify predictors of SICU admission within the first two postoperative days. A predictive model was generated and validated.

Results: Of 434 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 127(29%) required a SICU admission within the first two postoperative days. VR was significantly higher in SICU patients (Median 30.6% [IQR 14.4-59.0] vs. 10.6% [IQR 4.35-23.6], P < 0.001). Male sex, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, prior component separation, recurrent incisional hernia, hernia grade 3, and VR showed higher odds of SICU admission. When validated on a testing dataset, these variables showed strong SICU admission predictions, with an area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.82, 81.7% and 68.5%, respectively.

Conclusions: The volume ratio in combination with preoperatively available variables can reliably predict postoperative SICU admission following abdominal wall reconstruction. Anticipating such events preoperatively allows for bed space allocation as well as optimizing postoperative care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
田中评分可预测腹壁重建术后外科重症监护入院情况。
目的:随着腹壁重建技术的发展,越来越多的复杂疝气患者接受了可能需要术后入住外科重症监护室(SICU)的修复手术。疝囊与腹腔的容积比(VR)是量化疾病严重程度和随之而来的生理损伤的一种简便方法。本研究旨在利用 VR 和其他术前变量预测术后入住 SICU 的情况:方法:对2014年9月至2019年10月期间接受大腹部疝(宽度≥18厘米)修复手术的患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。通过单变量和多变量方法分析了患者的人口统计学特征、合并症、腹部手术史和VR,以确定术后前两天入住SICU的预测因素。结果显示,在符合纳入标准的 434 例患者中,有 1 例患者在术后 2 天内入住 SICU:在符合纳入标准的 434 名患者中,有 127 人(29%)在术后头两天内需要入住 SICU。SICU 患者的 VR 明显更高(中位数 30.6% [IQR 14.4-59.0] vs. 10.6% [IQR 4.35-23.6], P 结论:容积比结合术前可用变量可以可靠地预测腹壁重建术后入住 SICU 的情况。术前预测此类事件有助于床位分配和优化术后护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education
Decision Sciences-Journal of Innovative Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
36.80%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Identifying New Frontiers of Learning and Pedagogy Issue Information Learning from the pandemic Effectiveness of compressed online undergraduate courses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1