The unexpected persistence of non-corporate platforms: The role of local and network embeddedness

Filipe Mello Rose
{"title":"The unexpected persistence of non-corporate platforms: The role of local and network embeddedness","authors":"Filipe Mello Rose","doi":"10.1016/j.diggeo.2021.100020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Covid19-pandemic has accelerated processes in which digital platforms, privileged by their critical size, become central instances of urban life. While most scholars associate platform urbanism with transnational platform corporations, such as Amazon or Facebook, local non-corporate platforms unexpectedly persist despite lacking critical size. This article analyzes processes through which non-corporate platforms are created, maintained, disseminated, and locally implemented; given this type of platform's absence of critical size. We explain the persistence of local non-corporate platforms by drawing on the concept of embeddedness. Embeddedness accounts for non-market-based, i.e. socially and culturally influenced behavior, that shapes economic interactions. We distinguish between network embeddedness, in which organizations maintain permanent and exclusive relationships with one another, and local embeddedness, which combines Hess' (2004) notions of societal embeddedness and territorial embeddedness. This article is empirically grounded on an analysis of two <em>most different</em> ways of creating and maintaining, disseminating, and locally implementing non-corporate platforms: Platform cooperativism and free/libre open-source software-based platforms (FLOSS-based platforms). Two empirical case studies of collaboratively governed Western-European non-corporate platforms, <em>Gebiedonline</em> and <em>Decidim,</em> respectively inform the analysis of platform cooperativism and FLOSS-based platforms. <em>Gebiedonline</em> is a platform cooperative through which neighborhood and theme-specific platforms are created. <em>Decidim</em> is a FLOSS-based platform that is mainly used for civic and political participation processes. We find that governments and civil society stakeholders create non-corporate platform technology by disentangling processes related to the creation, maintenance, and dissemination of platform technology from platform implementation processes. Following platform creation, platform maintenance is embedded in a network. Non-corporate platforms pool cost-intensive technology maintenance, while platform implementation necessarily takes place in a locally embedded manner.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100377,"journal":{"name":"Digital Geography and Society","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100020"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378321000118/pdfft?md5=5fd0b3f749a900e0db364f0b6487d63c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666378321000118-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Geography and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378321000118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Covid19-pandemic has accelerated processes in which digital platforms, privileged by their critical size, become central instances of urban life. While most scholars associate platform urbanism with transnational platform corporations, such as Amazon or Facebook, local non-corporate platforms unexpectedly persist despite lacking critical size. This article analyzes processes through which non-corporate platforms are created, maintained, disseminated, and locally implemented; given this type of platform's absence of critical size. We explain the persistence of local non-corporate platforms by drawing on the concept of embeddedness. Embeddedness accounts for non-market-based, i.e. socially and culturally influenced behavior, that shapes economic interactions. We distinguish between network embeddedness, in which organizations maintain permanent and exclusive relationships with one another, and local embeddedness, which combines Hess' (2004) notions of societal embeddedness and territorial embeddedness. This article is empirically grounded on an analysis of two most different ways of creating and maintaining, disseminating, and locally implementing non-corporate platforms: Platform cooperativism and free/libre open-source software-based platforms (FLOSS-based platforms). Two empirical case studies of collaboratively governed Western-European non-corporate platforms, Gebiedonline and Decidim, respectively inform the analysis of platform cooperativism and FLOSS-based platforms. Gebiedonline is a platform cooperative through which neighborhood and theme-specific platforms are created. Decidim is a FLOSS-based platform that is mainly used for civic and political participation processes. We find that governments and civil society stakeholders create non-corporate platform technology by disentangling processes related to the creation, maintenance, and dissemination of platform technology from platform implementation processes. Following platform creation, platform maintenance is embedded in a network. Non-corporate platforms pool cost-intensive technology maintenance, while platform implementation necessarily takes place in a locally embedded manner.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非公司平台的意外持久性:本地和网络嵌入的作用
2019冠状病毒病大流行加速了数字平台成为城市生活中心的进程,在这一进程中,数字平台因其庞大的规模而享有特权。虽然大多数学者将平台城市化与跨国平台公司(如亚马逊或Facebook)联系在一起,但当地的非公司平台出人意料地持续存在,尽管缺乏临界规模。本文分析了创建、维护、传播和本地实现非企业平台的过程;考虑到这类平台没有临界尺寸。我们利用嵌入性的概念来解释本地非企业平台的持久性。嵌入性解释了塑造经济互动的非市场行为,即受社会和文化影响的行为。我们区分了网络嵌入性和地方嵌入性,前者是指组织之间保持永久和排他性的关系,后者结合了Hess(2004)的社会嵌入性和地域嵌入性概念。本文以经验为基础,分析了创建、维护、传播和本地实现非企业平台的两种最不同的方式:平台合作主义和基于自由/自由开源软件的平台(基于floss的平台)。两个协作治理的西欧非公司平台的实证案例研究,Gebiedonline和Decidim,分别为平台合作主义和基于floss的平台的分析提供了信息。Gebiedonline是一个平台合作社,通过它可以创建社区和特定主题的平台。Decidim是一个基于floss的平台,主要用于公民和政治参与过程。我们发现,政府和民间社会利益相关者通过将与平台技术的创建、维护和传播相关的过程与平台实施过程分离开来,创造了非企业平台技术。在创建平台之后,将平台维护嵌入到网络中。非企业平台汇集了成本密集的技术维护,而平台实现必须以本地嵌入的方式进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Broker bureaucracies: The subsidiary offices of the digitalizing state (Retail) platform legitimation through municipal partnerships? Characterizing climate change sentiments in Alaska on social media Counter-mapping platformization. Rethinking the spatial differentiation of platform control, labor relations and restaurant virtualization in proprietary markets for food-delivery Synthetic geospatial data and fake geography: A case study on the implications of AI-derived data in a data-intensive society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1